Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [EW] Intel cuts training, delays 14nm, raises fears for Ireland.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[EW] Intel cuts training, delays 14nm, raises fears for Ireland. - Page 2

post #11 of 127

...Everyone's blaming AMD.

Everyone's blaming AMD when Intel clearly stated that this is as a result of "slow-down in demand." A slow-down that applies to all x86 processor manufacturers for laptops/desktops/tablets, which I don't think necessarily has anything to do with performance.

 

...and everyone's blaming AMD. doh.gif
Where is ARM in this?

Hexagonal
(16 items)
 
Voyager [XT875]
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ARM Cortex A9 dual core [1.2Ghz]  TI OMAP 4430 PowerVR SGX 540 1GB low power DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
16GB on board storage 32GB Class 10 MicroSDHC card Android 4.0.4 "Ice Cream Sandwich" (LiquidSmoot... 4.3" 960x540 TFT capacitive multi-touch screen 
KeyboardPowerCase
Swiftkey 3 Battery Motorola DROID BIONIC 
  hide details  
Reply
Hexagonal
(16 items)
 
Voyager [XT875]
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ARM Cortex A9 dual core [1.2Ghz]  TI OMAP 4430 PowerVR SGX 540 1GB low power DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
16GB on board storage 32GB Class 10 MicroSDHC card Android 4.0.4 "Ice Cream Sandwich" (LiquidSmoot... 4.3" 960x540 TFT capacitive multi-touch screen 
KeyboardPowerCase
Swiftkey 3 Battery Motorola DROID BIONIC 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 127
If it's really because of low demand, then I dont blame them. There's not a game in the world that current tech can't run efficiently. We aren't flooded with games that are too hard on the CPU side of hardware to play. Things, especially at high res, are still mostly GPU limited. So meh, its a delay in shipment of the next big thing.

I get the feeling that if Intel announced that they were going to release a new CPU every three months, half of OCN would be up in arms about them "milking the consumer for every penny." Now that they're going to do a slowdown in CPU release, it just means that the OTHER half of OCN is going to gripe about them having no competition and trying to make more money, etc. Etc.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Not telling Gigabyte something Folding for OCN 2 x 2 GB Crucial 1333mhz (Cuz it works) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 128GB (8 second boot) Stock cooler Windows 8 Pro x64 (ClassicShell FTW) LG 21.5" 1080p IPS 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS 1600x900 IBM Model M (CLICKY!!) NZXT HALE82 750w (Hale to the chief) NZXT Source 210 (it was cheap) 
MouseAudioAudio
Logitech MX518 ASUS Xonar DS (onboard sucks) Sennheiser HD 280 Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Not telling Gigabyte something Folding for OCN 2 x 2 GB Crucial 1333mhz (Cuz it works) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 128GB (8 second boot) Stock cooler Windows 8 Pro x64 (ClassicShell FTW) LG 21.5" 1080p IPS 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS 1600x900 IBM Model M (CLICKY!!) NZXT HALE82 750w (Hale to the chief) NZXT Source 210 (it was cheap) 
MouseAudioAudio
Logitech MX518 ASUS Xonar DS (onboard sucks) Sennheiser HD 280 Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 127
This isn't about competition, I don't think AMD really presented enough of a threat to motivate them anyway, at least within the past several years. This is about low demand like the article states. If the demand within a certain frame of time is low there's no reason for Intel to push out 14nm when very few people will end up buying it. It's better to bide their time and wait for the opportune time to work on new products. Just to be clear here, competition means little, even for competing products, if overall demand is low.
VIII
(17 items)
 
  
Reply
VIII
(17 items)
 
  
Reply
post #14 of 127

There's also the fact that design is more difficult when fab node is smaller. 14nm is going to be extremely expensive for Intel, perhaps to the point where it is unhealthy to push it forward fast when demand is going to be low.  On the other hand, AMD may be able to lead on while maintaining 28nm, thanks to HSA; Intel has no such solution for inexpensive innovation because they are refusing to adopt HSA in their products. So these are going to be an interesting next-few-years...

Hexagonal
(16 items)
 
Voyager [XT875]
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ARM Cortex A9 dual core [1.2Ghz]  TI OMAP 4430 PowerVR SGX 540 1GB low power DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
16GB on board storage 32GB Class 10 MicroSDHC card Android 4.0.4 "Ice Cream Sandwich" (LiquidSmoot... 4.3" 960x540 TFT capacitive multi-touch screen 
KeyboardPowerCase
Swiftkey 3 Battery Motorola DROID BIONIC 
  hide details  
Reply
Hexagonal
(16 items)
 
Voyager [XT875]
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ARM Cortex A9 dual core [1.2Ghz]  TI OMAP 4430 PowerVR SGX 540 1GB low power DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
16GB on board storage 32GB Class 10 MicroSDHC card Android 4.0.4 "Ice Cream Sandwich" (LiquidSmoot... 4.3" 960x540 TFT capacitive multi-touch screen 
KeyboardPowerCase
Swiftkey 3 Battery Motorola DROID BIONIC 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 127
AMD needs to step up their game and provide some competition.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
8 Ham @ 4.6 bacon Wheat Bread baked edition TRi-Peppers (Red/Green/Yellow) Mayonnaise +Ketchup+Mustard 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
Lettuce Onions Food 64bit Tabasco 
Case
Brown bag 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
8 Ham @ 4.6 bacon Wheat Bread baked edition TRi-Peppers (Red/Green/Yellow) Mayonnaise +Ketchup+Mustard 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
Lettuce Onions Food 64bit Tabasco 
Case
Brown bag 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by xd_1771 View Post

...Everyone's blaming AMD.
Everyone's blaming AMD when Intel clearly stated that this is as a result of "slow-down in demand." A slow-down that applies to all x86 processor manufacturers for laptops/desktops/tablets, which I don' tthink necessarily has anything to do with performance.

...and everyone's blaming AMD. doh.gif

Where is ARM in this?

AMD is a significant factor in this. Yes, Intel is slowing down the introduction of 14nm because since the demand isn't high enough for them to follow their initial roadmap they would cannibalize their 22nm products if they went ahead as scheduled. However, that line of thinking is only valid if their 22nm products are dominating the market, which is the case. If AMD came out with a processor lineup that took away a significant percentage of Intel's sales, then they would have to release their 12nm products asap in order to gain back market share.

Demand is only half the story when it comes to deciding when to release a new product. Competition is the other half, which is why AMD's ineptitude is significant.
My System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K @ 4.5GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 GTX Titan Corsair Vengeance Low Profile (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 256GB SSD Western Digital Caviar Black Sony Optiarc Corsair H100 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Dell UltraSHarp U2713HM Dell UltraSharp U2312HM Microsoft Sidewinder X4 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX750 Corsair Carbide 500R Black Logitech G500 SteelSeries QcK Mass 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K @ 4.5GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 GTX Titan Corsair Vengeance Low Profile (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 256GB SSD Western Digital Caviar Black Sony Optiarc Corsair H100 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Dell UltraSHarp U2713HM Dell UltraSharp U2312HM Microsoft Sidewinder X4 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX750 Corsair Carbide 500R Black Logitech G500 SteelSeries QcK Mass 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 127
AMD doesn't even have 28nm CPUs, interesting argument. Intel already has CPUs for under $75 retail in 22nm, and their mainstream quad core 22nm CPU is under $175, both are inexpensive, another interesting point.
post #18 of 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akheton View Post

AMD is a significant factor in this. Yes, Intel is slowing down the introduction of 14nm because since the demand isn't high enough for them to follow their initial roadmap they would cannibalize their 22nm products if they went ahead as scheduled. However, that line of thinking is only valid if their 22nm products are dominating the market, which is the case. If AMD came out with a processor lineup that took away a significant percentage of Intel's sales, then they would have to release their 12nm products asap in order to gain back market share.
Demand is only half the story when it comes to deciding when to release a new product. Competition is the other half, which is why AMD's ineptitude is significant.

If AMD presented a real threat Intel would simply drop prices on Ivy bridge, due to the power of their brand people would respond more to a price drop from Intel. Mapping out an expansion seldom has to do with competition, forcing out a new product that wouldn't normally be due for another year to respond to competition now doesn't even make sense. It's as simple as that. Competition isn't part of the equation here, and even if it is it's almost negligible.
VIII
(17 items)
 
  
Reply
VIII
(17 items)
 
  
Reply
post #19 of 127
You can't make people buy something they don't need or want.
Money
(13 items)
 
Z575
(9 items)
 
Oppo Find 5
(6 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8320 @ 4.7Ghz 1.5v Gigabyte 970A-UD3 XFX 7970 @ 1.1Ghz 8GB Team 1600 7-9-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 64GB Samsung F3 500GB Corsair H100 Windows 7 x86_64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
NEC E222W HPE 87 w/ Browns + Ducky PBT caps Seasonic 850W Chenming Dragon 
Mouse
Deathadder 3.5G 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD A6-3420M @ 2.2Ghz 1.1v Lenovo Torpedo A55 6720g2 6GB Elpida 1333 CL9 
Hard DriveOSMouseAudio
Samsung 840 250GB Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64 Abyssus 3.5G Plantronics Gamecom 777 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
1.5Ghz Snapdragon S4 Pro Quad Adreno 320 2GB 533Mhz LPDDR2 16GB flash 
OSMonitor
Jelly Bean 4.1.1 5" 1080p IPS 
  hide details  
Reply
Money
(13 items)
 
Z575
(9 items)
 
Oppo Find 5
(6 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8320 @ 4.7Ghz 1.5v Gigabyte 970A-UD3 XFX 7970 @ 1.1Ghz 8GB Team 1600 7-9-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 64GB Samsung F3 500GB Corsair H100 Windows 7 x86_64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
NEC E222W HPE 87 w/ Browns + Ducky PBT caps Seasonic 850W Chenming Dragon 
Mouse
Deathadder 3.5G 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD A6-3420M @ 2.2Ghz 1.1v Lenovo Torpedo A55 6720g2 6GB Elpida 1333 CL9 
Hard DriveOSMouseAudio
Samsung 840 250GB Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64 Abyssus 3.5G Plantronics Gamecom 777 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
1.5Ghz Snapdragon S4 Pro Quad Adreno 320 2GB 533Mhz LPDDR2 16GB flash 
OSMonitor
Jelly Bean 4.1.1 5" 1080p IPS 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 127
Well like people already said that for the average consumer there isn't anything out there in terms of programs/games that demand a lot of power. Once the next gen consoles hit the market and new games get developed I think there will be a growth. My only worry is that what happened when the speed of the CPU/GPU gets much faster than the what average people need? What would be the next big step?
 
HTPC/Server
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
920 i7 D0 (Watercooled) EVGA X58 Classified 760 (Watercooled) EVGA GTX 480 SLI (Watercooled) EVGA GTX 480 SLI (Watercooled) 
GraphicsRAMHard DriveHard Drive
EVGA 8800GT (Physx) Corsair Dominator (Watercooled) 3x4Gb 12gb 2000mhz Crucial M4 Crucial M4 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Western Digital RE4 Western Digital RE4 Liteon Bluray EK HF Supreme Full Nickel CPU Waterblock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 64-bit Benq XL2420TX Logitech G710+ Mechanical Corsair AX1200i 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CaseLabs STH10 Logitech G9x SteelSeries 9H Asus Xonar DX 
OtherOtherOtherOther
EK Ram Block EK Classified Full Motherboard Block Lamptron Touch Fan Controller Alphacool UT60 Radiator 
OtherOtherOther
Alphacool XT45 Radiator Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX480 GPU Waterblock Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX480 GPU Waterblock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 2105 Asus P8H77-I Intel 3000 Corsair Vengeance CML4GX3M2A1600C9 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSKeyboard
Western Digital RE4 Western Digital Black Windows 8 Professional Logitech K400 
PowerCase
Antec EarthWatts EA-380D Lian Li PC-Q25B 
  hide details  
Reply
 
HTPC/Server
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
920 i7 D0 (Watercooled) EVGA X58 Classified 760 (Watercooled) EVGA GTX 480 SLI (Watercooled) EVGA GTX 480 SLI (Watercooled) 
GraphicsRAMHard DriveHard Drive
EVGA 8800GT (Physx) Corsair Dominator (Watercooled) 3x4Gb 12gb 2000mhz Crucial M4 Crucial M4 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Western Digital RE4 Western Digital RE4 Liteon Bluray EK HF Supreme Full Nickel CPU Waterblock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 64-bit Benq XL2420TX Logitech G710+ Mechanical Corsair AX1200i 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CaseLabs STH10 Logitech G9x SteelSeries 9H Asus Xonar DX 
OtherOtherOtherOther
EK Ram Block EK Classified Full Motherboard Block Lamptron Touch Fan Controller Alphacool UT60 Radiator 
OtherOtherOther
Alphacool XT45 Radiator Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX480 GPU Waterblock Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX480 GPU Waterblock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 2105 Asus P8H77-I Intel 3000 Corsair Vengeance CML4GX3M2A1600C9 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSKeyboard
Western Digital RE4 Western Digital Black Windows 8 Professional Logitech K400 
PowerCase
Antec EarthWatts EA-380D Lian Li PC-Q25B 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [EW] Intel cuts training, delays 14nm, raises fears for Ireland.