Quote:
Originally Posted by levathar 
I don't really agree. In a time where portatility is becoming the essence of the problem, a smaller die will make the diference. If Intel feels that the lead they have is enough to decelerate, I can understand that, but in no way things are going bad for desktops or the chip makers.
We are living in a time that EVERYTHING as a processor or a chip inside. I have 2 desktops and 3 laptops, 4 cellphones and possibly a tablet on the way. This is my household. Many others exist.
We are already dependant on all this. And it will continue to go "worse".
How can that be bad for Intel and others?
The world is a little bit on idle, it is still the aftermath of the 2008 crisis.
In a couple of years everything will go back to normal, i Think.

I don't really agree. In a time where portatility is becoming the essence of the problem, a smaller die will make the diference. If Intel feels that the lead they have is enough to decelerate, I can understand that, but in no way things are going bad for desktops or the chip makers.
We are living in a time that EVERYTHING as a processor or a chip inside. I have 2 desktops and 3 laptops, 4 cellphones and possibly a tablet on the way. This is my household. Many others exist.
We are already dependant on all this. And it will continue to go "worse".
How can that be bad for Intel and others?
The world is a little bit on idle, it is still the aftermath of the 2008 crisis.
In a couple of years everything will go back to normal, i Think.
EXACTLY. The economy me be down but laptops, tablets and desktops are big sellers no matter what time of the year it is. They've become important parts of our everyday life.










The few hundred boys and girls left without jobs from AMD are nothing along what Intel will do in the next 2 years.

