Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth 
Your position has and appears it will always be against Windows 8 because it is causing you work as you stated yesterday. However that is again getting off topic, as this is about performance and not about your opinion of Windows 8. However at least this time you posted some references.
I don't see how this will be any different than when people on Windows XP had to upgrade to Vista for 10 even though games still supported 9. I feel this will be the same event. Games will still support 11. Unless you need 11.1 for the apparent Stereo 3d feature or thats what i think it means.

Your position has and appears it will always be against Windows 8 because it is causing you work as you stated yesterday. However that is again getting off topic, as this is about performance and not about your opinion of Windows 8. However at least this time you posted some references.
I don't see how this will be any different than when people on Windows XP had to upgrade to Vista for 10 even though games still supported 9. I feel this will be the same event. Games will still support 11. Unless you need 11.1 for the apparent Stereo 3d feature or thats what i think it means.
My feelings towards Metro have nothing do with with the performance issue.
I didn't feel the need to link what was already linked to several times before. Just like where the performance difference has been stated here and on other threads ... and it's only about 1% different.
It'll be the better part of a decade, or more, before game companies will switch to 11.1 and require Windows 8. This is assuming, of course, that Microsoft doesn't do what they did with Vista, and retro DirectX 11 into Vista. Remember Vista was supposed to not support DirectX 11, only DirectX 10 and earlier. That was Microsoft's "carrot and stick" to get people to upgrade from Vista to Windows 7 ... which as it turned out, wasn't really needed, because Vista had a horrible launch.
So when I see people say or insinuate that there are technical reasons (and not purely monetary ones) as to why an UPDATE to DirectX 11 (ie DirectX 11.1) can't be applied to Windows 7, I have to laugh. Most likely it's the same people who said the same thing about DirectX 11 and Windows Vista ... and we all know that was a lie.
So, I will restate my position on this ...
Microsoft is, if the rumors of them making DirectX 11.1 ONLY for Windows 8 and not for Vista and/or Windows 7 are true, doing the "DirectX 11.1 is only for Windows 8 purely for non-technical reasons so they can make money SELLING software updates ... ie Windows 8.






