Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [Guru3D] Call Of Duty Black Ops II VGA Graphics performance review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Guru3D] Call Of Duty Black Ops II VGA Graphics performance review - Page 9

post #81 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by moocowman View Post

Isn't it possible to change the FPS cap? The game is definitely not meant to be running at 30FPS.

The thing is, if you have your Vsync enabled, it limits the FPS to 60, and then once i hit the ADS button it would drop to 30. Once i turned it off i was running the game at around 120 constant.
post #82 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by th3illusiveman View Post

Well it runs well because it looks bad.
Anyways my issue is with G3D claiming to show ingame screenshots then cropping them... What's the point?


lol why even bother seeing how cod games run it uses old id tech 3 engine that quake 3 arena used but its obviously been modified
The Rigster
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Amd FX-6100 Black Edition @4.7Ghz Gigabyte Evga GTX 560ti 1GB 8 gigs ddr3  
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
1 TB Lg cooler master Win 7 ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
23' acer 1920x1080 indland lepa 500watt Storm Scout 
MouseMouse PadAudio
inland Giaint counter strike source pad 5.1 logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
The Rigster
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Amd FX-6100 Black Edition @4.7Ghz Gigabyte Evga GTX 560ti 1GB 8 gigs ddr3  
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
1 TB Lg cooler master Win 7 ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
23' acer 1920x1080 indland lepa 500watt Storm Scout 
MouseMouse PadAudio
inland Giaint counter strike source pad 5.1 logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #83 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gexx View Post

The thing is, if you have your Vsync enabled, it limits the FPS to 60, and then once i hit the ADS button it would drop to 30. Once i turned it off i was running the game at around 120 constant.

You should have your vsync set to the refresh rate of your monitor. Unless you like looking at screen tearing....
post #84 of 192
Hopefully the game will have better graphics than the previous ones, which all looked like crap to me
Normandy
(19 items)
 
Secondary rig
(7 items)
 
Galaxy S5
(7 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690K Gigabyte Z97 D3H XFX 290X DD Kingston HyperX Fury 1866 MHz (1X8) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOS
Samsung EVO 850 500gb WD Caviar Green 2TB 2x 500GB WD Caviar Black/Blue Windows 10 Pro (64-Bit) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
QNIX QX2710 27" 1440P Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Cooler Master GX-750W Bitfenix Colossus 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Razer Deathadder Razer Goliathus Control Edition Soundblaster Audigy RX 7.1 Denon AVR 1507 7.1 Surround System 
AudioAudio
Fiio E17 ALPEN DAC/AMP Sennheiser HD 558 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2Q Q8300 @3.0 GHz MSI P45-Neo2 HD 5450 Samsung 2x 2 
Hard DriveOSCase
Samsung 160gb Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit Brandless Mid-Tower 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
2.50GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Adreno 330 2GB 16GB Internal Storage 
OSMonitorPower
Adroid KitKat 4.4.2 5.10" - 1080x1920 2800 mAh 
  hide details  
Reply
Normandy
(19 items)
 
Secondary rig
(7 items)
 
Galaxy S5
(7 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690K Gigabyte Z97 D3H XFX 290X DD Kingston HyperX Fury 1866 MHz (1X8) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOS
Samsung EVO 850 500gb WD Caviar Green 2TB 2x 500GB WD Caviar Black/Blue Windows 10 Pro (64-Bit) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
QNIX QX2710 27" 1440P Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Cooler Master GX-750W Bitfenix Colossus 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Razer Deathadder Razer Goliathus Control Edition Soundblaster Audigy RX 7.1 Denon AVR 1507 7.1 Surround System 
AudioAudio
Fiio E17 ALPEN DAC/AMP Sennheiser HD 558 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2Q Q8300 @3.0 GHz MSI P45-Neo2 HD 5450 Samsung 2x 2 
Hard DriveOSCase
Samsung 160gb Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit Brandless Mid-Tower 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
2.50GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Adreno 330 2GB 16GB Internal Storage 
OSMonitorPower
Adroid KitKat 4.4.2 5.10" - 1080x1920 2800 mAh 
  hide details  
Reply
post #85 of 192
I mean, it looks like call of duty...some cutscenes are just movie files rendered at a really low resolution and look terrible, other cutscenes are actual in game stuff and look good. It's no battlefield 3 in terms of graphical and sound quality, but its still fun to play.
post #86 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crouch View Post

Hopefully the game will have better graphics than the previous ones, which all looked like crap to me

I have it on pc. It looks better on black ops 1 IMO. Not by much but i can see subtle differences
post #87 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilhe4e12345 View Post

a 6 year old game that gets 120+ fps on the newer graphics cards? who knew....?
Congrats you the millionth person to recycle that joke. Again, source uses the same engine yet they get praise, but if CoD does it we have a million morons who dont even play the game dogging on it.rolleyes.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by valvegamer View Post

lol why even bother seeing how cod games run it uses old id tech 3 engine that quake 3 arena used but its obviously been modified

Again, same recycled joke and you manage to still mess it up. It uses the Havok engine not the Id engine. Maybe if you didn't recycle other peoples fail jokes, you would not have got that wrong. lol





Black ops 2


Left for dead 2



To me the first one looks way better, but hey what do I know Im not a hater.rolleyes.gif
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
post #88 of 192
The difference being Source engine games that you are referring to do not get yearly releases(Left 4 Dead series, HL, portal, etc)....much less the frequency that CoD games are made. At least have an idea of what you are comparing.


Hold the phone, you mean a newly released game (does not matter engine...just release date) looks better than one that has been on the market for years?

Shocker, EH?
Something
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 w/ 1.4v Gigabyte EP35 DS3R Asus DirectCU II GTX 580 Patriot Extreme Performance 2x1gb 800mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD Black 2 TB Windows 7 64bit Samsung Syncmaster BX2350 + 42' LG LCD Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair TX650 V2 HAF 932 Death Adder 3.5g, G9x, Naga 2012 
  hide details  
Reply
Something
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 w/ 1.4v Gigabyte EP35 DS3R Asus DirectCU II GTX 580 Patriot Extreme Performance 2x1gb 800mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD Black 2 TB Windows 7 64bit Samsung Syncmaster BX2350 + 42' LG LCD Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair TX650 V2 HAF 932 Death Adder 3.5g, G9x, Naga 2012 
  hide details  
Reply
post #89 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimaggio1103 View Post

Congrats you the millionth person to recycle that joke. Again, source uses the same engine yet they get praise, but if CoD does it we have a million morons who dont even play the game dogging on it.rolleyes.gif
Again, same recycled joke and you manage to still mess it up. It uses the Havok engine not the Id engine. Maybe if you didn't recycle other peoples fail jokes, you would not have got that wrong. lol
Black ops 2

Left for dead 2

To me the first one looks way better, but hey what do I know Im not a hater.rolleyes.gif

Actually, Havok is only the physics engine. It's also true that the original IW engine is based off of the Id Tech 3 engine, but it's gone through so many changes that at this point it has no resemblance to the IT3 engine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylon View Post

The difference being Source engine games that you are referring to do not get yearly releases(Left 4 Dead series, HL, portal, etc)....much less the frequency that CoD games are made. At least have an idea of what you are comparing.
Hold the phone, you mean a newly released game (does not matter engine...just release date) looks better than one that has been on the market for years?
Shocker, EH?

I don't see how Source games not having yearly releases is relevant at all. It's still the same engine they've been using since Half Life 2 came out. However, just like the IW engine, it's been through many changes over time. I'm not going to criticize either of them.
Edited by moocowman - 11/14/12 at 10:15am
post #90 of 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylon View Post

The difference being Source engine games that you are referring to do not get yearly releases(Left 4 Dead series, HL, portal, etc)....much less the frequency that CoD games are made. At least have an idea of what you are comparing.
Hold the phone, you mean a newly released game (does not matter engine...just release date) looks better than one that has been on the market for years?
Shocker, EH?

Considering people where saying the game looks the same as the first CoD release, whats the problem?

That's exactly my point. The game looks pretty decent, its no Battlefield 3 but its not meant to either. So all the complaining by people say "herp derp, its a 2004 game" is incorrect and idiotic.

Game looks good to me, plays great to. Its become a bandwagon thing to hate on CoD, and frankly it gets annoying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moocowman View Post

I don't see how Source games not having yearly releases is relevant at all. It's still the same engine they've been using since Half Life 2 came out. However, just like the IW engine, it's been through many changes over time.

Cause people are sheeple on here, and refuse to see outside of others presumptions.
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [Guru3D] Call Of Duty Black Ops II VGA Graphics performance review