Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [bbc] IBM reveals tech advances of the future
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[bbc] IBM reveals tech advances of the future - Page 6

post #51 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by HanSomPa View Post

I always fail to see how having a branch for consumer level products is by any means a bad thing. Once you get past the start up costs and continually generate revenue equal or greater to your expenditures, where's the harm? It increases your portfolio, as well as promote the strength of your brand. Besides liability and risk factors I don't see what would be so bad about it...

It takes away resources from what could be used on a larger market. You might get your money back by giving products to consumers but if they spend the money, researchers, production, etc. on their larger contracts their profit margins go up.

It's not a "bad" thing. There's just more money to be had elsewhere as consumers don't tend to pay massive amounts for products like a corporation can. Let another company dumb down and cheapen a high quality product to sell for consumer use.
Lawl Mark II
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
Lawl Mark II
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
post #52 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwilightEscape View Post

It takes away resources from what could be used on a larger market. You might get your money back by giving products to consumers but if they spend the money, researchers, production, etc. on their larger contracts their profit margins go up.
It's not a "bad" thing. There's just more money to be had elsewhere as consumers don't tend to pay massive amounts for products like a corporation can. Let another company dumb down and cheapen a high quality product to sell for consumer use.

Ok at the risk of looking like an anarchist revolutionary (again), and not to point this comment at IBM specifically (again), but does it bother anyone else that in terms of total purchasing power, business as a whole exceeds that of consumers as a whole?
post #53 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by HanSomPa View Post

I always fail to see how having a branch for consumer level products is by any means a bad thing. Once you get past the start up costs and continually generate revenue equal or greater to your expenditures, where's the harm? It increases your portfolio, as well as promote the strength of your brand. Besides liability and risk factors I don't see what would be so bad about it...

Selling more products lines means increase logisitics, customer services levels, management, risk, etc. Business can get too large. They begin to lose focus and it becomes harder for them to change directions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by un-midas touch View Post

Ok at the risk of looking like an anarchist revolutionary (again), and not to point this comment at IBM specifically (again), but does it bother anyone else that in terms of total purchasing power, business as a whole exceeds that of consumers as a whole?
It's not about market size alone.

Most tech companies rather sell high-margin products to savvy market that builds very strong relationships rather than very low-margin products to an uninformed market who are fickle.

Do you want to sell a $100K server and support to a single company.... or 1000 $1K computers and support to 1000 people?
Edited by DuckieHo - 11/15/12 at 8:21am
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #54 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by un-midas touch View Post


Ok at the risk of looking like an anarchist revolutionary (again), and not to point this comment at IBM specifically (again), but does it bother anyone else that in terms of total purchasing power, business as a whole exceeds that of consumers as a whole?

No. Where I work cash flow is an order of magnitude greater than labour costs. One business operated by five people has the spending power of dozens of consumers.
post #55 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveHighDPI View Post

No. Where I work cash flow is an order of magnitude greater than labour costs. One business operated by five people has the spending power of dozens of consumers.

I think you missed the point of my question.
post #56 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by hirolla888 View Post

More than likely it's due to ignorance. Those people don't realize that IBM is still a major player in the IT world, especially in the systems architecture/ consulting/ datacenter fields. They probably think it's just an "old " hardware vendor from the 80s rolleyes.gif

Indeed. My dad knows only a little bit about computers but he always praised IBM when I was a child, and my ancient IBM laptop with 128MB RAM worked fine, until some half-wit decided to put loads of modern software and bloatware on it. On windows XP no less.
post #57 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harbinger View Post

Someone care to tell me why we have so much IBM hate here? I'm really curious.

Young people who don't know IBM's history.
Black Velvet:
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k Intel DZ68BC 6950 Flashed to 6970 Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256gb Troqx M28, 2x2TB RAID1, 1TB WD Black Liteon 24X DL Burner Windows 7 Pro 64-bit Dell 3007wfp-hc 30"/Catleap Q270/Dell 2007fp S-... 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
QuickFire Cherry Blue Antec Neo-link 1200watt CoolerMaster HAF 932 Logitech G5 
Mouse PadAudio
Destructer Xonar D1 
  hide details  
Reply
Black Velvet:
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k Intel DZ68BC 6950 Flashed to 6970 Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256gb Troqx M28, 2x2TB RAID1, 1TB WD Black Liteon 24X DL Burner Windows 7 Pro 64-bit Dell 3007wfp-hc 30"/Catleap Q270/Dell 2007fp S-... 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
QuickFire Cherry Blue Antec Neo-link 1200watt CoolerMaster HAF 932 Logitech G5 
Mouse PadAudio
Destructer Xonar D1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #58 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mygaffer View Post

Young people who don't know IBM's history.

Pretty much this.

IBM gets to take a lot of credit when it comes to pioneering personal computers, servers, microprocessors... pretty much anything digital.
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX6300 Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 AM3+ Sapphire HD 7770 GHz Edition CORSAIR Vengeance LP 8GB DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Western Digital WD5003AZEX Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus Windows 8 Pro 64bit 40" 1080p Sceptre LCD HDTV 
PowerCaseAudio
Antec VP450 NZXT Source 210 Elite Black Yamaha RXV1065, Grado Labs SR80, Cerwin Vega E315 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium 4 w/ HT 3.2GHz Dell N6381 Intel Extreme Graphics 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... 512MB DDR 400 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Western Digital 160GB IDE lol. Windows XP Home Edition 32bit Dell M0148 250w 
Case
Dell Dimension 3000 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX6300 Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 AM3+ Sapphire HD 7770 GHz Edition CORSAIR Vengeance LP 8GB DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Western Digital WD5003AZEX Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus Windows 8 Pro 64bit 40" 1080p Sceptre LCD HDTV 
PowerCaseAudio
Antec VP450 NZXT Source 210 Elite Black Yamaha RXV1065, Grado Labs SR80, Cerwin Vega E315 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium 4 w/ HT 3.2GHz Dell N6381 Intel Extreme Graphics 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... 512MB DDR 400 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Western Digital 160GB IDE lol. Windows XP Home Edition 32bit Dell M0148 250w 
Case
Dell Dimension 3000 
  hide details  
Reply
post #59 of 88
There's no IBM hate here.
post #60 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by un-midas touch View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveHighDPI View Post

No. Where I work cash flow is an order of magnitude greater than labour costs. One business operated by five people has the spending power of dozens of consumers.

I think you missed the point of my question.

That there's a whole lot of tech and services that completely ignore common people because we couldn't even dream of affording it?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Technology and Science News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [bbc] IBM reveals tech advances of the future