Originally Posted by Newbie2009
IMO, yes. Looks great, follows the older games well enough to be a worthy successor.
Originally Posted by Anth0789
Running this game on high it shows that my CPU is getting old.
You're *crazy.* My little 3.5ghz Nehalem i5 isn't struggling to push 2 460s at ALL. Constant 100% GPU load. Sure, it's harder to push a 680. But is the game playable? Of course, you're bound to be getting higher FPS than I am.
Nehalems got quite a bit of life left in in, man.
Originally Posted by BradleyW
So, how come the in game MSAA is a massive fps killer, but when forced it does the same quality but with less of an fps hit?
I don't see it as a hit at all. A small one, which is to be expected with any AA. I haven't bothered trying the Nvidia control panel's MSAA because in game frames are fantastic, and again, the bench gives me high 40s/low 50s. Plenty for such a slow paced game.
Originally Posted by Mr.Eiht
I will try that later. Cause with everything cranked up and ~18fps in the benchmark with my 680 I was a bit
Do you have Nvidia's newest beta driver? My SLI wasn't working, and was getting dismal frames with one card. Updating fixed all that. Those frames, with a 680, I'm guessing it's more than MSAA (which - again, my machine has had no problem with.)Edited by pursuinginsanity - 11/23/12 at 4:02pm