Originally Posted by marikso
Why is it of lower quality?...It's AMVA so angles are not so good,but contrast is much better...
Then it is glossy so colours are better,unlike U2312HM which uses the aggresive 3H coating.
But what do you think of S2340L:
-Ips,glossy so vibrant colours.also the reviews I read said it has almost the same response time as U2312HM
This entire "AG ruins colors" thing is getting out of hand. I'm beginning to think people are confusing oversaturated or otherwise uncalibrated colors for better colors. With AG the worst thing you'll experience is color shift with bright colors in the presence of direct light which, IMO, is better than being blinded by the same light being reflected into your face.
Also, I've (briefly) owned the S2440L. The thing is a literal mirror. In light I constantly saw my face and even in the darkness it picked up insignificant light like my keyboard's backlighting on low or the ambient light from my 2nd monitor and reflects it. I've seen the S2340L as well, and though I haven't used it like the S2440L it's about as reflective. The A-MVA panel on the S2440L itself is good though, great contrast and blacks as you would expect from xVA type panels. Straight out of the box had some pretty horrible colors though. I don't recall which mode it was but it was the one with the least tinting; everything was too cool and the colors were muted. If you have the money for a nice monitor do yourself a favor and get a calibration tool somewhere along the line. I admit I'm a little biased but I think it's definitely a worthy investment at any rate.
As for a recommendation, I recommend the PB238Q.