Originally Posted by Shogon
I have a hard time calling it monopolizing, they invented it, or at least made Lightboost accessible to us all. It's another reason to go Nvidia over AMD. I'm sure AMD could invent, or make something just like Lightboost, if they wanted. Or is there a patent on strobe lighting?
When you activate Lightboost you will most likely never use anything besides it. I'm exaggerating, but my eyes burn when I'm not using Lightboost. It's so apparent it's funny, but not so much when I notice the blur lol. The colors may not be as good as the Samsung's, but a little calibrating and you're set. If you have a colorimeter like a Spyder4 it really helps.
i understand, but they did not invent the monitor
so telling me that a monitor works better with card A than card B, is a bit bad
it's like me telling you an intel i7 works better with windows then mac.
i understand where your reason comes from
however, if nvidia invented a technology that can only be benefited by their cards, and MONITORS are affected, that's why i look at it how i do.
they didn't invent something to better the use of computers for all, just something to give them a lead in the market. which in sense to me looks like a monopoly because if you dont buy their card regardless how much better the competitors is you can't use their "technology" (meanwhile) their technology has been hacked and works on AMD with the strobelight.exe so makes me wonder why i'd be forced to overpay for an underperforming card to receive a "branded" technology when it's available with a cracked .exe
(sure some nvidia cards are great, but you know what i mean
in some price ranges, amd cards kill nvidia cards )