Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [The Tech Report] Radeon HD 7950 vs. GeForce GTX 660 Ti revisited
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[The Tech Report] Radeon HD 7950 vs. GeForce GTX 660 Ti revisited - Page 49  

post #481 of 745
Lets not close thread please smile.gif unless it drops into a massive pointless fight, but im quite enjoying reading all this. Gives us sth to talk about xD (quite important to me as im reading these things in boring lectures xD
post #482 of 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

brettjv has nothing to do with this. He has a GTX670 and one that can do 1391Mhz. Let me put my 1.35Ghz HD 7970 in here too because it very relevant.

I jumped in because there was talk on this thread earlier (from Raghu, if memory serves) that 7950 actually = 670, not 660ti, so I felt invited. Plus ... I get to decide these things biggrin.gif

And guys, I'm sitting right here rolleyes.gif I'm not going to let you get away with being snarky to one another while I'm here, so knock it off. Your posts were edited as necessary, hopefully these changes illustrate to you what is okay, and what is not thumb.gif
Edited by brettjv - 12/9/12 at 11:07am
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
post #483 of 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

brettjv has nothing to do with this. He has a GTX670 and one that can do 1391Mhz. Let me put my 1.35Ghz HD 7970 in here too because it very relevant.

Except people have said "7950 is on par or better than 670 so no question it will destroy a 660ti" So I think since some AMD guys touted 7950 being on par or better makes the 670 benches really relevant.
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
post #484 of 745
It has been said many times already, that frame rate numbers don't offer information on the actual topic, which is frame time analysis and latency. Frame rates are not latency indicators. But if there is one thing that is even more off topic, it's 3DMark scores. This is of course IMHO, not trying to step on brettjv's toes biggrin.gif
The Air Tunnel
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4820K (4500MHz@1.28V) P9X79 Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X New Edition Team Group Vulcan 4x4GB 2133MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
2x240GB SSD @RAID 0 Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 Windows 10 Pro Corsair AX750 
CaseAudio
Rosewill Armor EVO hiFace+AudioGD+DT770Pro 
  hide details  
The Air Tunnel
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4820K (4500MHz@1.28V) P9X79 Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X New Edition Team Group Vulcan 4x4GB 2133MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
2x240GB SSD @RAID 0 Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 Windows 10 Pro Corsair AX750 
CaseAudio
Rosewill Armor EVO hiFace+AudioGD+DT770Pro 
  hide details  
post #485 of 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv View Post

Kepler Boost is the difference between the two numbers. In my case, my card has a KB of 130. IOW, GPU-Z will say 1261, whereas the graph will show 1391. See the first link in my sig for more info thumb.gif

Ah.. ok thanks for the info redface.gif.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv View Post

That reminds me ... I did that run I posted above back in early June. I wonder if I can beat it with the 310's?

You are running 8.17.13.134 which is something like 301.34 if I remember correctly. 304 series offered some good performance improvements against 301.XX,
so you will most likely get a few higher points with 310.XX, just not sure if you will see improvements if you are using 304.XX or higher.
That's impressive you broke 11K with such old drivers though thumb.gif.
My GTX 670 didn't break 10700 even with 306.02. I think it is probably because of the more ram or the triple-channel with socket 1366 .
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.5GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SAMSUNG 850 PRO 1TB SAMSUNG 950 PRO NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV Logitech G910 Orion Spark + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.5GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SAMSUNG 850 PRO 1TB SAMSUNG 950 PRO NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV Logitech G910 Orion Spark + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
post #486 of 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by specopsFI View Post

It has been said many times already, that frame rate numbers don't offer information on the actual topic, which is frame time analysis and latency. Frame rates are not latency indicators. But if there is one thing that is even more off topic, it's 3DMark scores. This is of course IMHO, not trying to step on brettjv's toes biggrin.gif

Oh, yeah ... the whole things gone off-topic, but us mods generally don't worry too much about threads going OT when they're many days old and thus everyone who wants to comment on the original subject has presumably done so wink.gif

As you can see from the 2nd link in my sig, the topic of frame-times and latencies is actually one of great interest to me thumb.gif
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
post #487 of 745
This is not my card, overclocking it right now, but....

http://www.overclock.net/t/884072/post-your-3dmark11-scores/3200_20#post_18783296

d4da65a6_123.PNG

There is really no reason to have a "bench off" in response to this review....

The proof is already in the benches in the thread I have posted.
post #488 of 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by di inferi View Post

This is not my card, overclocking it right now, but....
http://www.overclock.net/t/884072/post-your-3dmark11-scores/3200_20#post_18783296 Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
d4da65a6_123.PNG
There is really no reason to have a "bench off" in response to this review....
The proof is already in the benches in the thread I have posted.

Wow ... that's 10.5% better than my old GTX 670 eek.gif.
That is a significant difference considering HD 7950 is cheaper ...
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.5GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SAMSUNG 850 PRO 1TB SAMSUNG 950 PRO NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV Logitech G910 Orion Spark + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.5GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SAMSUNG 850 PRO 1TB SAMSUNG 950 PRO NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV Logitech G910 Orion Spark + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
post #489 of 745
Have to mention, people dont say the 7950 will match an Oc gtx 670, they say a stock gtx 670. over here, a 7950 = 370euro and a gtx 670 is 470 minimum so in a case like mine, a 7950 would come quite good
post #490 of 745
No, people do indeed say an oc 7950 will match/beat an oc 670. Look at the benches...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [The Tech Report] Radeon HD 7950 vs. GeForce GTX 660 Ti revisited