Originally Posted by IronMaiden1973
I feel that users should get another non biased view of the monitor instead of applause for this just because your pushing it.
What a completely silly statement. These are my first Eizo monitors and I have no affiliation with Eizo. I only rate monitors highly when they deserve so. I am critical of many products out there. If the Eizo's didn't perform, they would have been returned immediately. I have recieved monitors and within two minutes of turning them on they have been packed up and shipped back. I don't put up with inferior products.
I've owned and reviewed dozens of monitors over the last decade and pride myself on providing decent advise and being objective. Having a sample size of three and all having good quality, I can only go off of that. Random people putting out one sentance blurbs about "this" or "that"on their sample isn't very reliable. I get it, for you the monitor price is high and you don't think it is worth it. Thats wonderful, no need to continuously harp on it. There are plenty of other monitors out there for you to buy.