Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz 
Do you really want me to prove I've got easy access to both an i5 3570k and my FX-4170? Naturally, even if I have a video of both rigs running side by side with the same GPU, you'd still deny it I bet, or claim that the Intel rig was running a worse GPU. That's why I laugh when I see people saying that Intel is so much faster for gaming, yes they are faster but not by as much as is suggested in reviews, I know, I've gamed on both extensively.
Do you really want me to prove I've got easy access to both an i5 3570k and my FX-4170? Naturally, even if I have a video of both rigs running side by side with the same GPU, you'd still deny it I bet, or claim that the Intel rig was running a worse GPU. That's why I laugh when I see people saying that Intel is so much faster for gaming, yes they are faster but not by as much as is suggested in reviews, I know, I've gamed on both extensively.
You shouldn't be testing the 3570K vs the FX-4170 (Or any bulldozer for that matter) You should be testing the FX-8350 against the 3570K since they're in the same price/performance range. Luckily for you that's already been done by two members of this forum...What do the results show? EXTREMELY minimal differences @ 1920 x 1080. If you where to step up to 2560 X 1440/1600 the gap would close EVEN MORE because then the games become extremely GPU dependent.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1333027/amd-fx-8350-vs-i5-3570k-delidded-single-gpu-and-crossfire-gpu
Unfortunately the large amount of trolls caused the OP to lock the thread down.
Edited by M3T4LM4N222 - 12/29/12 at 12:37am
Trinity POWER
(12 items) |
|
Trinity POWER
(12 items) |
