AMD is known for running their chips at a stupidly high stock voltage... might as well undervolt an 8320; surely the silicon isn't much different if at all between this and the other Vishera chips.
The difference between them is something like 50W, plus if you're talking about i5s AMD completes tasks much quicker (unless we're talking about gaming and stuff). Since the tasks are completed quicker, energy is being used over a shorter period of time. So while maximum energy usage might be much higher, the actual difference is much smaller.
If you're talking about i7s, I don't know where you live but here in the USA such a small difference in power usage does not amount to that kind of money. Even if you're talking Micro Center deals.
What do you think Intel's low-TDP chips are?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j3st3r 
I'll say it once and I'll say it again:
the amount of money you save from buying a bulldozer chip OVER the Intel equivalent is rendered useless after the power bills start coming in. In the long run you SAVE money by going Intel. No reason to buy an AMD. Sorry fanboys - just being real with you guys.

I'll say it once and I'll say it again:
the amount of money you save from buying a bulldozer chip OVER the Intel equivalent is rendered useless after the power bills start coming in. In the long run you SAVE money by going Intel. No reason to buy an AMD. Sorry fanboys - just being real with you guys.
The difference between them is something like 50W, plus if you're talking about i5s AMD completes tasks much quicker (unless we're talking about gaming and stuff). Since the tasks are completed quicker, energy is being used over a shorter period of time. So while maximum energy usage might be much higher, the actual difference is much smaller.
If you're talking about i7s, I don't know where you live but here in the USA such a small difference in power usage does not amount to that kind of money. Even if you're talking Micro Center deals.
Quote:
This chip is just undervolted and underclocked for more money lol.
What do you think Intel's low-TDP chips are?














