Quote:
Originally Posted by
j3st3r 
Because historically new iterations of processors have always fallen in between 10-15% improvements. Where is YOUR evidence to the contrary?
It just seems like you are trying to start an argument honestly.
Dude 1 - "Man, they say it will be 30% faster."
Non-AMD Dude - "Nope, you're wrong."
Dude 2 - "Look at this info from AMD *shows info*."
Non-AMD Dude - "Nope, you're wrong."
Dude 1 - "But they claimed 5% and 15% boosts between BD -> PD -> Vish, and they did it, so maybe they'll nail this."
Non-AMD Dude - "Nope, you're wrong. End of story."
We can be hopeful that AMD is gonna blow the doors down with SR and really make Intel sweat... There's nothing wrong with that. People have presented evidence to support this claim, and you can't say with ANY certainty that they WON'T accomplish this, just as I'm sure all the AMD posters realize there's a chance that AMD might fall short of a claimed 30% increase. It's just conjecture on both sides, but some is hopeful and pleasant, and some is "WOW your an idiot."
Also, back to the OP: I'm interested to see where they go with this low-watt design in terms of price.
-Donny