Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Beta Testing thread - Black Hole Benchmark
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Beta Testing thread - Black Hole Benchmark - Page 5

post #41 of 470
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stige View Post



My contribution smile.gif

Nice score!
post #42 of 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadGoat View Post

Do yourself a favor and jump that northbridge up at least 600mhz... you will think you bought a new processor.

Not much of a change really.. :-(



Revo.
It.
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4790k Asus Maximus VII Hero Galax GTX 980 Kingston HyperX Beast 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Crucial M4  Hitachi Sata WDC Sata WDC USB External 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Barracuda Samsung DVD/RW Alpenföhn K2 Mount Doom CPU Cooler Windows 7 Professional 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VH242H 24" Corsair K70 Corsair HX 1050 HAF 932  
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Proteus Core Mionix Sargas 900 ASUS Zonar DGX 5.1 Sound Card Corsair 1500 vengance 
  hide details  
Reply
It.
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4790k Asus Maximus VII Hero Galax GTX 980 Kingston HyperX Beast 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Crucial M4  Hitachi Sata WDC Sata WDC USB External 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Barracuda Samsung DVD/RW Alpenföhn K2 Mount Doom CPU Cooler Windows 7 Professional 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VH242H 24" Corsair K70 Corsair HX 1050 HAF 932  
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Proteus Core Mionix Sargas 900 ASUS Zonar DGX 5.1 Sound Card Corsair 1500 vengance 
  hide details  
Reply
post #43 of 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution996 View Post

Not much of a change really.. :-(



Revo.

Great, now you've got the bandwidth... give that memory some legs!

At cl9 timings you should be at least 1600mhz memory... decent ram with higher voltages (~1.5-1.55) can do ~1700 at cl8. Furthermore I dont think you'll see much of difference with the NB in this benchmark. but go ahead and benchmark a game you play regularly. You'll be impressed.

Oh an that's a pretty good score for a 4core chip. Your only 3k off from my score with a hexcore @ 4.2.
Edited by MadGoat - 1/22/13 at 11:00am
FX'd
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Amd FX 8350 GA-990FXA-UD3 R5 EVGA GTX 660 SC EVGA GTX 660 SC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16gb Samsung 30nm Corsair Performance Pro OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 840 EVO 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Lite-on DVD/CD Swiftech H220 Win 10 + Start 10 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G510 Corsair HX1050 SilverStone RV02 MS SideWinder 
Mouse PadAudio
MIONIX Propus 380 Realtek ALC1150 
  hide details  
Reply
FX'd
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Amd FX 8350 GA-990FXA-UD3 R5 EVGA GTX 660 SC EVGA GTX 660 SC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16gb Samsung 30nm Corsair Performance Pro OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 840 EVO 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Lite-on DVD/CD Swiftech H220 Win 10 + Start 10 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G510 Corsair HX1050 SilverStone RV02 MS SideWinder 
Mouse PadAudio
MIONIX Propus 380 Realtek ALC1150 
  hide details  
Reply
post #44 of 470
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadGoat View Post

Great, now you've got the bandwidth... give that memory some legs!

At cl9 timings you should be at least 1600mhz memory... decent ram with higher voltages (~1.5-1.55) can do ~1700 at cl8

Oh at thats a pretty good score for a 4core chip. Your only 3k off from my score with a hexcore @ 4.2.

speed of ram doesn't affect the score by much, lowering timings does affect it VERY much!
post #45 of 470
post #46 of 470
When i klick on the file i get an error that it has stopt working.

Win 7 64 bits
post #47 of 470
i dont know why but this version does not run it not even starts gives me an error right after the double click...
post #48 of 470
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by [CyGnus] View Post

i dont know why but this version does not run it not even starts gives me an error right after the double click...

Do you have the same problem with the RB 4.1? Hmm, getting angry about this problem... Idk what I included in the code that could cause it, and the only hard solution is to reinstall windows (what's not what I want people to do...).
You got .Net updated to last version? Try running it as admin.
post #49 of 470
4.1 runs just fine 4.2b force closes
post #50 of 470
5.2 2700K
MCP
(17 items)
 
Loki
(2 items)
 
Rinzler
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700K 5GHz Asus P8Z68 Deluxe Gen3 EVGA GTX-1080Ti (4x8GB) Crucial Balistix 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
A bunch of SSD's LG DVD Combo Apogee Xt Rev 1.0, 360 Rad + D5 Fedora 25 
OSMonitorMonitorMonitor
Windows 10 Acer 32" 4k Acer 32" 4k Wacom Cintiq 27 QHD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Corsair AX850 Coolermaster HAF-X Corsair 
Audio
Xonar DG 
CPUGraphics
Intel i7-4558U Intel Iris 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 720QM Proprietary GTX 260M 4 gb DDR3 1066 
Hard Drive
500 GB WD Caviar Black 
  hide details  
Reply
MCP
(17 items)
 
Loki
(2 items)
 
Rinzler
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2700K 5GHz Asus P8Z68 Deluxe Gen3 EVGA GTX-1080Ti (4x8GB) Crucial Balistix 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
A bunch of SSD's LG DVD Combo Apogee Xt Rev 1.0, 360 Rad + D5 Fedora 25 
OSMonitorMonitorMonitor
Windows 10 Acer 32" 4k Acer 32" 4k Wacom Cintiq 27 QHD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Corsair AX850 Coolermaster HAF-X Corsair 
Audio
Xonar DG 
CPUGraphics
Intel i7-4558U Intel Iris 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 720QM Proprietary GTX 260M 4 gb DDR3 1066 
Hard Drive
500 GB WD Caviar Black 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Beta Testing thread - Black Hole Benchmark