Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › AMD Quad-FX Review @ XbitLabs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD Quad-FX Review @ XbitLabs - Page 2

post #11 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragosmp View Post
I read other reviews, links here and here and it seems the situation may be looked upon a different perspective.
It's true that FX74 is weaker than QX6700, but hey, it's also a lot cheaper. At the egg a QX is 1499$ and a EVGA 680I SLI another 250$. A FX74 should be 999$ and the ASUS 680a around 300$.
This makes an interesting comparison: Intel 1750$ vs AMD 1300$ ... Ok, the performance is not the same, but the price isn't either. IMO the 4x4 was supposed to narrow the gap between the top AMD and the top Intel products, which it succeeded.
That point is entirely moot. Newegg's price is inflated by at least $400, as we have all seen repeatedly on anything in high-demand that is only left in-stock at the egg (because everyone buys the ones that are at the actual retailer prices first).

Now, add in that the "budget" Intel quad-core chips are coming out and you can easily get a setup that will be comparable for cheaper. I don't think it's difficult to imagine that Intel will be dropping the price of their top-end one by $50 or something right when the AMD one hits the market, either, but who knows. You'd also have to buy two aftermarket HSFs on the AMD, adding a bit to the cost if you don't go stock.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PaRaDoX
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...VudGh1c2lhc3Q=

I don't think that is stomping the AMD
I wouldn't trust HardOCP for jack on CPU reviews at all--read their "real world" Core 2 article (back when Core 2's just hit the market), they do everything within their power to make the AMD LOOK as if it has comparable processing power to Core 2 chips; they will no longer lower the graphics settings so their game benchmarks are GFX bottle-necked, not CPU bottled (ie. their testing doesn't show differences between power of CPU, but GPU). I'd wait for their actual numbers, but they're probably doing it the same retarded way as to sway people toward AMD.


Anyways, I'm just pointing some things out, I want some more benchmarks so we can find out what the real deal is ><

Oh yah... and let's not forget overclocking, which we have nfc if the AMDs can do yet--looks like we'll have to wait for more motherboards or something to see if it's the chips that suck for OCing or if it's the mobo x-bit used.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 27
Other reviews are out there, AMD gets beat, but not stomped. 3% - 5% seems to be how much faster the QX6700 is.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jori View Post
Other reviews are out there, AMD gets beat, but not stomped. 3% - 5% seems to be how much faster the QX6700 is.
Oh snap, just looked at all of the other topic posts in the news section; that's what happens when I go to bed before 12:00 AM once a year
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 27
Anyone think that when AMD releases a true monolithic quad-core on 65nm we'll see these benchmarks flip? or will Intel's monolithic quad-core die just exagerate these? I love a tight race and I really want AMD to catch up.
Wolfdale
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E5200 @ 3.15 GHz ASRock P43TWINS1600 Radeon HD4670 4GB Super Talent 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Caviar Black, Caviar 250GB NEC Windows 7 x64, Vista 32 20" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Apple, yes, Apple. Antec Smartpower 500 Antec Solo Logitech MX700 
  hide details  
Reply
Wolfdale
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E5200 @ 3.15 GHz ASRock P43TWINS1600 Radeon HD4670 4GB Super Talent 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1TB Caviar Black, Caviar 250GB NEC Windows 7 x64, Vista 32 20" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Apple, yes, Apple. Antec Smartpower 500 Antec Solo Logitech MX700 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 27
dam..AMD seems to be really getting their but kicked by intel...looks like il be moving over to the dark side soon
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 3900mhz (1.440v) atm VID 1.2125 Gigabyte P45 DQ6 XFX 4870 X2 2x2GB G.Skills PI @ 1040mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
400gb Seagate + 2 x 80GB Seagate + 160GB WD Pioneer Sata DVD DL Windows 7 Ultimate RC1 32" LG7000 1920x1080 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech S510 XFX 650Watt XXX Modular Edition Custom Modded Logitech S510 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 G0 3900mhz (1.440v) atm VID 1.2125 Gigabyte P45 DQ6 XFX 4870 X2 2x2GB G.Skills PI @ 1040mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
400gb Seagate + 2 x 80GB Seagate + 160GB WD Pioneer Sata DVD DL Windows 7 Ultimate RC1 32" LG7000 1920x1080 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech S510 XFX 650Watt XXX Modular Edition Custom Modded Logitech S510 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 27
My concern has always been how do you cool these things?! Its not like you can put big typhoons I dont even thing a AC64 would fit...

pink
sudo rm -r /
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium M 735 Gateway Intel Extreme 2 Graphics 8mb Shared 1x 512mb 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital 160gb 5400rpm Gateway DVD Burner Dual Layer Arch Linux 14.1 in Widescreen Ultrabright WXGA TFT 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Gateway Built In 6-cell Lithium Ion Gateway Laptop Synaptics Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
sudo rm -r /
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium M 735 Gateway Intel Extreme 2 Graphics 8mb Shared 1x 512mb 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital 160gb 5400rpm Gateway DVD Burner Dual Layer Arch Linux 14.1 in Widescreen Ultrabright WXGA TFT 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Gateway Built In 6-cell Lithium Ion Gateway Laptop Synaptics Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 27
None of our aftermarket cooling solutions fits on it probably. It really bothers me that its using 510W on full load though! If AMD doesn't come out with something more power efficent when I move to quad-core, I just might be forced to go to Intel.
The Naked Scooter
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 4Ghz@1.24V Asus P6T Deluxe eVGA GTX 285 12GB Patriot DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24@1.65V 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x640GB WD in RAID 0+1TB Seagate 7200.11 HP LightScribe DVD Burner Windows 7 Ultimate x64 22" Samsung 720p HDTV 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 1000W Antec TruePower Quattro CoolerMaster ATCS 840 Logitech G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
The Naked Scooter
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 4Ghz@1.24V Asus P6T Deluxe eVGA GTX 285 12GB Patriot DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24@1.65V 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x640GB WD in RAID 0+1TB Seagate 7200.11 HP LightScribe DVD Burner Windows 7 Ultimate x64 22" Samsung 720p HDTV 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 1000W Antec TruePower Quattro CoolerMaster ATCS 840 Logitech G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
post #18 of 27
i wonder if you can take the fx-74 and put it in a single core solution (like a socket-f board) and overclock the piss out of it...

that way you'd have like 2 processors for 450 a pop
The pink bicycle
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 @ 3.4 GHz Asus P5N-E Asus 4890 1 gb 2 x 2 GB OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x 150 GB Raptors RAID0 work in progress Windows 7 7600 x64 19" Acer LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft basic Antec 650w my desk mx518 
Mouse Pad
steelpad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
The pink bicycle
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 @ 3.4 GHz Asus P5N-E Asus 4890 1 gb 2 x 2 GB OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x 150 GB Raptors RAID0 work in progress Windows 7 7600 x64 19" Acer LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft basic Antec 650w my desk mx518 
Mouse Pad
steelpad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaRaDoX View Post
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...VudGh1c2lhc3Q=

I don't think that is stomping the AMD
XbitLabs and Anandtech say differently and are generally more unbiased.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jori View Post
Other reviews are out there, AMD gets beat, but not stomped. 3% - 5% seems to be how much faster the QX6700 is.
Considering that the QX6700 is 334MHz slower and uses half the power, I would consider that to be a major and thorough buttkicking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragosmp
I read other reviews, links here and here and it seems the situation may be looked upon a different perspective.
It's true that FX74 is weaker than QX6700, but hey, it's also a lot cheaper. At the egg a QX is 1499$ and a EVGA 680I SLI another 250$. A FX74 should be 999$ and the ASUS 680a around 300$.
This makes an interesting comparison: Intel 1750$ vs AMD 1300$ ... Ok, the performance is not the same, but the price isn't either. IMO the 4x4 was supposed to narrow the gap between the top AMD and the top Intel products, which it succeeded.
Here we go again. Someone comparing AMD's MSRP against Intel's street price Tigerdirect is selling the QX6700 for $1099, which is much closer to Intel's MSRP of $999. Sure, AMD's MSRP might be $999 for the FX-74, but Im sure retailers will jack that up, especially with AMD's production shortages. Dont be surprised if Newegg sells them for $1499 or higher.
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 E2140 @2.67GHz Abit IP35 Pro Radeon X1900XT 512MB 2x1GB GSkill HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x500GB Samsung HD501LJ + 2x80GB (1.16TB total) 2 X NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Home 24" Acer LCD (AL2324W) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Executive PC P&C Silencer 610W AeroCool AeroEngine II w/ 2x140mm intake fans Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Generic foam rubber pad 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 E2140 @2.67GHz Abit IP35 Pro Radeon X1900XT 512MB 2x1GB GSkill HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x500GB Samsung HD501LJ + 2x80GB (1.16TB total) 2 X NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Home 24" Acer LCD (AL2324W) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Executive PC P&C Silencer 610W AeroCool AeroEngine II w/ 2x140mm intake fans Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
Generic foam rubber pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 27
Ill bring up the points of AMD's power management though.

Again ill explain what it can do..

Switch off unused cores (meaning it can turn a dual core into a single core technically), dynamically underclock cores to suit its needs.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › AMD Quad-FX Review @ XbitLabs