Overclock.net banner

BatchMark! (PUBLIC RELEASE!)

6K views 138 replies 25 participants last post by  mindblowingj 
#1 ·
This is BatchMark! Made by myself, from scratch!

Its a benching tool that is meant to test the speed at which your processor can run. It was built entirely in windows Batch.

It is just something fun, it is by no means a burn test, it doesn't stress your processor at all, it just measures how fast it can work.

This can now be considered a full bore benchmark! There will be more versions to come, but I have to learn new programming languages before that will happen!

BatchMark V1 Release notes:

- Running the processes involved with BatchMark! in realtime is not recommended, it skews the results in a negative fasion.
- Remember to turn off Power Now and SpeedStep for an accurate result.
- Feel free to distribute this anywhere and everywhere!
- Thanks to EVERYONE who helped out!
-- Ryleh
-- Smileman
-- Vonnis
-- FTW 420
-- Gomi
-- Kylepdalton
-- xplode-bg
-- rdr09
-- Derp
-- kzon75
-- OcN13
-- WR6133
-- superericla
-- tompsonn

Without further a due!

BatchMark.zip 36k .zip file


The rules for submission!

- Must have a screenshot of the "SCORE" screen on BatchMark fully visible
- CPU-Z must be in the screen shot
- Have fun
biggrin.gif

- Remember, the lower your score the better!

BatchMark! V1.1 Scoreboards!

1. FTW 420 - 8001
Processor - Core i7 3770k @ 6287 mhz

2. HemiRoR - 10512
Processor - Core i5 2500k @ 5000 mhz

3. Stu-Crossfire - 10998
Processor - Core i7 3770k @ 4724 mhz

4. Matthew89 - 11340
Processor - Core i5 3570k @ 4501

5. WR6133 - 11646
Processor - Core i5 3570K @ 4604 mhz

6. Vonnis - 12996
Processor Core i7 3820 @ 3600 MHZ

7. HOMECINEMA-PC - 13617
Processor - Core i7 3820 @ 5015 mhz

8. rdr09 - 16551
Processor - AMD Phenom II X6 1600T @ 4655 mhz

9. Disturbed117 - 18495
Processor - AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3712 mhz

10. Derp - 18720
Processor Core i7 920 @ 3507 mhz

11. XxBeNigNxX - 19755
Processor - Core i7 2620M @ 2700 mhz

12. Silvercast - 22815
Processor - FX-4170 @ 5213 mhz

13. kzone79 - 24237
Processor - FX-8320 @ 4832 mhz

14. Kylepdalton - 25119
Processor - Core i7 2720 @ 2200 mhz

15. xplode-bg - 25929
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 B55 @ 3611 MHZ

16. Rayleyne - 29079
Processor - Core i7 2630QM @ 2591 mhz

17. Hallengreen - 36243
Processor - Core i3 3217U @ 1796 MHZ


BatchMark! Hall of Fame!
FTW 420 - First person to crack the 10k mark!

The remains of the beta testing scoreboards are here.
BatchMark 5k
1 - FTW 420 - Score : 4752
Processor : Core i7 3770k @ 4801 MHz

2 - rdr09 - Score : 6822
Processor : AMD Phenom X4 960T @ 4000mhz

3 - Silvercast - Score : 8703
Processor : AMD FX-4179 @ 5227 MHz

4 - Vonnis - Score : 15093
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz

5 - kzone75 - Score : 19845
Processor : AMD A6-4455M @ 2631 MHz

BatchMark 10k

1 - rdr09 - Score : 13689
Processor : AMD Phenom X4 960T @ 4000mhz

2 - FTW 420 - Score : 18459
Processor : Core i7 3770k @ 4801 MHz

3 - Vonnis - Score : 21114
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz

4 - Silvercast - Score : 25047
Processor : AMD FX-4179 @ 4200 MHz

5 - kzone75 - Score : 40383
Processor : AMD A6-4455M @ 2631 MHz

BatchMark 25k

1 - rdr09 - Score : 33345
Processor : AMD Phenom X4 960T @ 4000mhz

2 - FTW 420 - Score : 53523
Processor : Core i7 3770k @ 4801 MHz

3 - Vonnis - Score : 57258
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz

4 - Silvercast - Score : 63198
Processor : AMD FX-4179 @ 4200 MHz

BatchMark 50k

1 - rdr09 - Score : 84600
Processor : AMD Phenom X4 960T @ 4000mhz

2 - Vonnis - Score : 123903
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz

3 - kzone75 - Score : 209286
Processor : AMD A6-4455M @ 2631 MHz

BatchMark 100k

1 - rdr09 - Score : 169335
Processor : AMD Phenom X4 960T @ 4000mhz

2 - Vonnis - Score : 220428
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz

BatchMark 1m

1 - FTW 420 - Score : 2325987
Processor : Core i7 3770k @ 4801 MHz

2 - Vonnis - Score : 2406447
Processor : Core i7 3820 @ 4400 MHz
 

Attachments

See less See more
2
#5 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryleh View Post

Why not just post them all as .bat files?

Anyways, here are my results(2k):
T7250 - 53047
i7 3820 - 10038

CPU is at 3.6ghz right now. Wonder how it'd do at 4.3ghz. Neat little program.
Well, they run smoother as a .exe, i worked on them for like 8 hours today (Well, "it", the difference between them all is literally one number) Running them as a .bat, they hang when you open a program, or they run slower with multiple .bat's running. As a .exe, they aren't affected by any of that. No idea why.
 
#8 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvercast View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryleh View Post

Why not just post them all as .bat files?

Anyways, here are my results(2k):
T7250 - 53047
i7 3820 - 10038

CPU is at 3.6ghz right now. Wonder how it'd do at 4.3ghz. Neat little program.
Well, they run smoother as a .exe, i worked on them for like 8 hours today (Well, "it", the difference between them all is literally one number) Running them as a .bat, they hang when you open a program, or they run slower with multiple .bat's running. As a .exe, they aren't affected by any of that. No idea why.
Not sure if I'm understanding your problem. Just ran it myself and my score actually increased by 3 points. I ran it while opening tons of programs, while opening other CMDs and while closing programs and absolutely nothing changed and the .bat didn't hang at all.

If you don't mind me asking, what line of work do you do (that has you doing things relevant to this) or what gave you your interest in making these kinds of files if you don't do something similar at work?
 
#10 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryleh View Post

Not sure if I'm understanding your problem. Just ran it myself and my score actually increased by 3 points. I ran it while opening tons of programs, while opening other CMDs and while closing programs and absolutely nothing changed and the .bat didn't hang at all.

If you don't mind me asking, what line of work do you do (that has you doing things relevant to this) or what gave you your interest in making these kinds of files if you don't do something similar at work?
I work at a call center. Nothing relevant to this at all honestly. I'm just nerdy as a deathstar icecube, or a pair of oldschool cokebottle nerd glasses. I just do stuff like this for fun.

Also, I tested the .bat files as .exe at my work, on their computer (probably older than myself.) I'll upload the .bat files in a zip as well.
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Says virus detected. Pretty much trojan horses and other stuf... (using AVG), or is this false-positive?
Copy any paste that code up there into a notepad and save it as "anything.bat" and run it. I'm also about to upload the .bat files.
 
#12 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Says virus detected. Pretty much trojan horses and other stuf... (using AVG), or is this false-positive?
Malwarebyte's(Pro if it matters) doesn't detect anything.

https://www.virustotal.com/file/cf7385d7c32da0b37dbb97621fb9862f8720057d413b7bc41e03c521f02543c1/analysis/1359283424/
https://www.virustotal.com/file/1ec0381f790362f44084283d50c45f67cfb4e7e9b194b140ada761147633adb4/analysis/1359283614/

VirusTotal gives it a 4/44 though when it is an exe but 0/44 when a .bat(no surprise).

WHen I compile the .bat to an .exe to myself it gets a 4/46 again for all of the exact same things
https://www.virustotal.com/file/aac20db5e5a22445c4468996e6f7adc054d2ea0b2e2ea9e6870e75bdfabda0b5/analysis/1359283751/

Silvercast's file is EXACTLY the same size as my file so it doesn't seem like the .exe/.bat differ at all. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if we were using the same tool. Haha.

It's probably just picking out a pattern in the code or something. o_O
 
#13 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryleh View Post

Malwarebyte's(Pro if it matters) doesn't detect anything.
Ya know, this is the second thread I've made about software that people have wined about viruses, seriously, I'm not an evil person who is intent on eating your systemz. I just like software related stuff.
 
#16 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Hmmm, interesting program. What does it really test?

I got 10029 on my i7 2600k @ 4.3ghz and ripsjaws+hyperX 1600mhz...
Batch files run as fast as your computer can run them, they don't have a processing cap. So the lower your score is the faster your processor is running.
 
#19 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

I think your program needs to be cleaned a bit, I got random scores that varie from 6900 to 13500...
I wasn't able to work that out at all. I tried. I don't know where that comes from, I haven't been able to isolate it, even working on it for 3 hours solid.
 
#20 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvercast View Post

I wasn't able to work that out at all. I tried. I don't know where that comes from, I haven't been able to isolate it, even working on it for 3 hours solid.
Like you can see, I'm developper from a bench myself. I'm working on it for 1 year right now (maybe a bit less) but I only encountered that problem running more then 1 thread. (but I got it stable now)
Try locking threads if batch allows you to.
 
#21 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Like you can see, I'm developper from a bench myself. I'm working on it for 1 year right now (maybe a bit less) but I only encountered that problem running more then 1 thread. (but I got it stable now)
Try locking threads if batch allows you to.
I'll see if I can come up with anything, but that may be above the capabilities of batch.
 
#22 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvercast View Post

Batch files run as fast as your computer can run them, they don't have a processing cap. So the lower your score is the faster your processor is running.
I think your program needs to be cleaned a bit, I got random scores that varie from 6900 to 13500...
These are my consecutive results (after fresh restart)

2k - 2098 | 9995 | 9986 | 9988 | 3982 | 9985 | 9992
20k - 98963 | 100056 |

I just ran 4 at the same time and got the following results
2k - 11960 | 11998 | 12015 | 12011
 
#24 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileMan View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryleh View Post

These are my consecutive results (after fresh restart)

2k - 2098 | 9995 | 9986 | 9988 | 3982 | 9985 | 9992
20k - 98963 | 100056 |
Mine is like - 13589 | 15364 | 12056 | 5962 | 10029 | 8785 | 6580 |....
Are you doing anything on your computer while it is running? Try restarting and running the program just 5 times by itself.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top