Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [OBR-HARDWARE]New GTX Titan benchmarks have arrived
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[OBR-HARDWARE]New GTX Titan benchmarks have arrived - Page 2  

post #11 of 606
Meh, synthetic benches. Let's see what it can do when it comes to games. Regardless, thanks for posting.

To be honest, this really isn't that great of a card IMO for the price they are (supposedly) asking. Realistically, in terms of graphical jumps this is where the 780 should be, not this...

2x 6970 = single 7970 roughly... 2x 680 would beat this with ease.

Yea yea I know, single gpu and it is indeed powerful, but it's not realistically this behemoth it's being made out to be when you look at prior graphics jumps between generations. Really hope the 780 tops this, otherwise those on 670/680 or 7950/7970's have no reason to upgrade other then epeen. Unless you are one of the .1% who demand 120fps with three monitors thumb.gif
The Struggle (4k)
(20 items)
 
File Server
(12 items)
 
Lenovo G50-45
(6 items)
 
CPUGraphicsRAMOS
Athlon II X2 250u Nvidia 6150SE  2gb DDR3 1066mhz Windows 10 Home 64 bit 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
AMD A8-6410 AMD R5 Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR3L 1866 CAS10 Crucial BX100 250gb 
Optical DriveOS
DVD Windows 10 Home 
  hide details  
The Struggle (4k)
(20 items)
 
File Server
(12 items)
 
Lenovo G50-45
(6 items)
 
CPUGraphicsRAMOS
Athlon II X2 250u Nvidia 6150SE  2gb DDR3 1066mhz Windows 10 Home 64 bit 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
AMD A8-6410 AMD R5 Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR3L 1866 CAS10 Crucial BX100 250gb 
Optical DriveOS
DVD Windows 10 Home 
  hide details  
post #12 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloCamo View Post

Meh, synthetic benches. Let's see what it can do when it comes to games. Regardless, thanks for posting.

To be honest, this really isn't that great of a card IMO for the price they are (supposedly) asking. Realistically, in terms of graphical jumps this is where the 780 should be, not this...

2x 6970 = single 7970 roughly... 2x 680 would beat this with ease.

Yea yea I know, single gpu and it is indeed powerful, but it's not realistically this behemoth it's being made out to be when you look at prior graphics jumps between generations. Really hope the 780 tops this, otherwise those on 670/680 or 7950/7970's have no reason to upgrade other then epeen. Unless you are one of the .1% who demand 120fps with three monitors thumb.gif

I disagree, for a single GPU that's up there with a GTX690 i think pricing is pretty much as it should be. People can be dissapointed with synthetic results all they like, but at the end of the day this is a Single GPU monstering everything. Impressive as it's still Kepler afterall....
 
X79 Build
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.0Ghz Asus Rampage V Extreme [Bios:3101] 2x EVGA GeForce Titan X SC Editions in SLI 32GB (4×8) Corsair Dominator Platinums (3000Mhz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Nvme 2x 256GB Vertex 4 SSD (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda [Storage] Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) Windows 10 Pro x64 2x 27" Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 144hz  Corsair AX1500i Digital ATX 80 Plus Titanium 
CaseAudio
Lian Li PC-O8WX ATX Cube Case Logitech Z906 5.1 Surround 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) 3x EVGA GTX780Ti's SC Editions 32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 Pro 64Bit & Win10 Pro 64Bit Asus ROG Swift (2560x1440 @144hz) Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
  hide details  
 
X79 Build
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.0Ghz Asus Rampage V Extreme [Bios:3101] 2x EVGA GeForce Titan X SC Editions in SLI 32GB (4×8) Corsair Dominator Platinums (3000Mhz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Nvme 2x 256GB Vertex 4 SSD (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda [Storage] Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) Windows 10 Pro x64 2x 27" Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 144hz  Corsair AX1500i Digital ATX 80 Plus Titanium 
CaseAudio
Lian Li PC-O8WX ATX Cube Case Logitech Z906 5.1 Surround 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) 3x EVGA GTX780Ti's SC Editions 32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer Corsair H105 (Push/Pull) 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 Pro 64Bit & Win10 Pro 64Bit Asus ROG Swift (2560x1440 @144hz) Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
  hide details  
post #13 of 606
Waiting support 5x1P yessir.gif the card. If not. Not so much Interesting.
post #14 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhill2029 View Post

I disagree, for a single GPU that's up there with a GTX690 i think pricing is pretty much as it should be. People can be dissapointed with synthetic results all they like, but at the end of the day this is a Single GPU monstering everything. Impressive as it's still Kepler afterall....

These results should also be taken with a grain of salt as there is no physical proof other than a few floating benchmark numbers (and those could be faked easily)

We're talking about a card with a TDP lower than the GTX 580, performance of around a 690, and power draw that is only a little bit more than an HD 7970 Ghz Ed. Sorry, but I'm a tad skeptical that this is even possible on a 28nm card. In fact, I know it is not possible.
Everest - Intel
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7 MSI Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X 16GB (2x8) Patriot Viper 1866Mhz  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate 3TB, WD 500GB HDD, WD 640GB HD Samsung 850 EVO 512GB Samsung DVD-Burner Corsair H110 w/ Dual Aerocool DS 140mm fans 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro Dell S2716DG (1440p, 144hz Gsync) AOC U3477 PQU (3440x1440 IPS) Logitech G810 Orion Spectrum 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Evga SuperNOVA 750 G2 NZXT Phantom 530 Black Logitech G502 Proteus Core Corsair MM400 
AudioAudioAudio
Creative Sound Blaster E5 DAC/AMP Sennheiser HD 598 Headphones HyperX Cloud Headset 
  hide details  
Everest - Intel
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7 MSI Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X 16GB (2x8) Patriot Viper 1866Mhz  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate 3TB, WD 500GB HDD, WD 640GB HD Samsung 850 EVO 512GB Samsung DVD-Burner Corsair H110 w/ Dual Aerocool DS 140mm fans 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro Dell S2716DG (1440p, 144hz Gsync) AOC U3477 PQU (3440x1440 IPS) Logitech G810 Orion Spectrum 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Evga SuperNOVA 750 G2 NZXT Phantom 530 Black Logitech G502 Proteus Core Corsair MM400 
AudioAudioAudio
Creative Sound Blaster E5 DAC/AMP Sennheiser HD 598 Headphones HyperX Cloud Headset 
  hide details  
post #15 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloCamo View Post

Meh, synthetic benches. Let's see what it can do when it comes to games. Regardless, thanks for posting.

To be honest, this really isn't that great of a card IMO for the price they are (supposedly) asking. Realistically, in terms of graphical jumps this is where the 780 should be, not this...

2x 6970 = single 7970 roughly... 2x 680 would beat this with ease.

Yea yea I know, single gpu and it is indeed powerful, but it's not realistically this behemoth it's being made out to be when you look at prior graphics jumps between generations. Really hope the 780 tops this, otherwise those on 670/680 or 7950/7970's have no reason to upgrade other then epeen. Unless you are one of the .1% who demand 120fps with three monitors thumb.gif

Uhm, what?
If you want to go by that logic then it is right where it should be. Compared the GTX 580 and GTX 680, GTX 590 and GTX 680, etc. etc. This is Nvidia and not AMD and even then the 6970's are greater than a 7970 by a margin depending on the mark.

It's going to be [by far] the fastest single GPU card on the market. While it isn't delivering quite 2x the performance of the 680 and will be at least 2x the price it is going to be a single GPU allowing for a much higher grade of SLI than 690's or 680's could bring.



I'd like to believe these are real but still seems a bit good to be true.
I would very much like to see what the GK110 brings later on down the road. This card is cool and all but I'd like to see some lower budget alternatives to replace the 660ti/670 niche.
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
post #16 of 606
Those stats do look more realistic performance for a GPU with a cost of $900. Those previous scores of X7107 were just rediculous!
VR
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4930k on H2O Asus RIVE GTX 1080Ti Ripjaws 16GB 2133Mhz 
Hard DriveMonitorMonitorPower
[x2] Samsung 830 RAID0  VR- HTC VIVE  Acer Predator X34 3440x1440 100Hz Gsync EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w 
AudioAudioAudioAudio
Fostex TH-900 Headphones Asus Xonar Essence One DAC Sennheiser HDVD800 Sennheiser HD800 
Audio
HiFiMan HE-5LE 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K Asrock Extreme 11 x4 GTX Titan Quad SLI + EK Blocks Ripjaws Z 16gb 2133  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] Samsung 830 SSD 128gb in Raid0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB HDD D5 Pump, Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta 480 + RX360 R... [x3] Qnix 2560x1440 120hz 
PowerAudioAudio
EVGA SR-2 1200w  Asus Xonar Essence One Amp/DAC Sennheiser HD800 Headphones 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 3930k Asus RIVE EVGA GTX 670 Quad SLI Ripjaws Z 16GB 2133 CL11 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] SSD Samsung 830 126GB RAID0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB XSPC Raystorm Block, RX360, D5 [x3] ASUS VG278H 27" 3D Monitors 
PowerCase
EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w CM HAF X 942 
  hide details  
VR
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4930k on H2O Asus RIVE GTX 1080Ti Ripjaws 16GB 2133Mhz 
Hard DriveMonitorMonitorPower
[x2] Samsung 830 RAID0  VR- HTC VIVE  Acer Predator X34 3440x1440 100Hz Gsync EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w 
AudioAudioAudioAudio
Fostex TH-900 Headphones Asus Xonar Essence One DAC Sennheiser HDVD800 Sennheiser HD800 
Audio
HiFiMan HE-5LE 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K Asrock Extreme 11 x4 GTX Titan Quad SLI + EK Blocks Ripjaws Z 16gb 2133  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] Samsung 830 SSD 128gb in Raid0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB HDD D5 Pump, Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta 480 + RX360 R... [x3] Qnix 2560x1440 120hz 
PowerAudioAudio
EVGA SR-2 1200w  Asus Xonar Essence One Amp/DAC Sennheiser HD800 Headphones 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 3930k Asus RIVE EVGA GTX 670 Quad SLI Ripjaws Z 16GB 2133 CL11 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] SSD Samsung 830 126GB RAID0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB XSPC Raystorm Block, RX360, D5 [x3] ASUS VG278H 27" 3D Monitors 
PowerCase
EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w CM HAF X 942 
  hide details  
post #17 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Pistol View Post

These results should also be taken with a grain of salt as there is no physical proof other than a few floating benchmark numbers (and those could be faked easily)

We're talking about a card with a TDP lower than the GTX 580, performance of around a 690, and power draw that is only a little bit more than an HD 7970 Ghz Ed. Sorry, but I'm a tad skeptical that this is even possible on a 28nm card. In fact, I know it is not possible.

Power draw is in line with a card clocked at 7xx core. Obr's numbers are overclocked and im sure its drawing a lot more. Anyway im sold guys. I'm buying 2 with my tax return sitting in my pocket

original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
post #18 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Power draw is in line with a card clocked at 7xx core. Obr's numbers are overclocked and im sure its drawing a lot more. Anyway im sold guys. I'm buying 2 with my tax return sitting in my pocket
Hell ya! That's what I'm talking about thumb.gif What kind of res are you going to run with that?
VR
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4930k on H2O Asus RIVE GTX 1080Ti Ripjaws 16GB 2133Mhz 
Hard DriveMonitorMonitorPower
[x2] Samsung 830 RAID0  VR- HTC VIVE  Acer Predator X34 3440x1440 100Hz Gsync EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w 
AudioAudioAudioAudio
Fostex TH-900 Headphones Asus Xonar Essence One DAC Sennheiser HDVD800 Sennheiser HD800 
Audio
HiFiMan HE-5LE 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K Asrock Extreme 11 x4 GTX Titan Quad SLI + EK Blocks Ripjaws Z 16gb 2133  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] Samsung 830 SSD 128gb in Raid0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB HDD D5 Pump, Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta 480 + RX360 R... [x3] Qnix 2560x1440 120hz 
PowerAudioAudio
EVGA SR-2 1200w  Asus Xonar Essence One Amp/DAC Sennheiser HD800 Headphones 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 3930k Asus RIVE EVGA GTX 670 Quad SLI Ripjaws Z 16GB 2133 CL11 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] SSD Samsung 830 126GB RAID0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB XSPC Raystorm Block, RX360, D5 [x3] ASUS VG278H 27" 3D Monitors 
PowerCase
EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w CM HAF X 942 
  hide details  
VR
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4930k on H2O Asus RIVE GTX 1080Ti Ripjaws 16GB 2133Mhz 
Hard DriveMonitorMonitorPower
[x2] Samsung 830 RAID0  VR- HTC VIVE  Acer Predator X34 3440x1440 100Hz Gsync EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w 
AudioAudioAudioAudio
Fostex TH-900 Headphones Asus Xonar Essence One DAC Sennheiser HDVD800 Sennheiser HD800 
Audio
HiFiMan HE-5LE 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K Asrock Extreme 11 x4 GTX Titan Quad SLI + EK Blocks Ripjaws Z 16gb 2133  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] Samsung 830 SSD 128gb in Raid0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB HDD D5 Pump, Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta 480 + RX360 R... [x3] Qnix 2560x1440 120hz 
PowerAudioAudio
EVGA SR-2 1200w  Asus Xonar Essence One Amp/DAC Sennheiser HD800 Headphones 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 3930k Asus RIVE EVGA GTX 670 Quad SLI Ripjaws Z 16GB 2133 CL11 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
[x2] SSD Samsung 830 126GB RAID0 Samsung Spinpoint 2TB XSPC Raystorm Block, RX360, D5 [x3] ASUS VG278H 27" 3D Monitors 
PowerCase
EVGA Classified SR-2 1200w CM HAF X 942 
  hide details  
post #19 of 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwilightEscape View Post

Uhm, what?
If you want to go by that logic then it is right where it should be. Compared the GTX 580 and GTX 680, GTX 590 and GTX 680, etc. etc. This is Nvidia and not AMD and even then the 6970's are greater than a 7970 by a margin depending on the mark.

It's going to be [by far] the fastest single GPU card on the market. While it isn't delivering quite 2x the performance of the 680 and will be at least 2x the price it is going to be a single GPU allowing for a much higher grade of SLI than 690's or 680's could bring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhill2029 View Post

I disagree, for a single GPU that's up there with a GTX690 i think pricing is pretty much as it should be. People can be dissapointed with synthetic results all they like, but at the end of the day this is a Single GPU monstering everything. Impressive as it's still Kepler afterall....


So in other words unless I'm misunderstanding both positions:

680 = slightly slower than 590 but priced at $500 (and most consider the 680 a bad deal compared to a 670 mind you)

Titan = slightly slower than a 690 but priced at easily $800 or more and yet this is considered a great card for the price?

I must be missing it because that makes absolutely no sense. Please also keep in mind these are synthetic benches as well.

Why does the titan get heralded as great and given a free pass to whatever price point Nvidia deems yet people constantly say the 680 is overpriced? It's not like either 680 nor 7970 came out a day ago... this is the normal upgrade cycle we were used to.

Realistically, this should be a 780 at $500...
Edited by SoloCamo - 2/10/13 at 8:16am
The Struggle (4k)
(20 items)
 
File Server
(12 items)
 
Lenovo G50-45
(6 items)
 
CPUGraphicsRAMOS
Athlon II X2 250u Nvidia 6150SE  2gb DDR3 1066mhz Windows 10 Home 64 bit 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
AMD A8-6410 AMD R5 Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR3L 1866 CAS10 Crucial BX100 250gb 
Optical DriveOS
DVD Windows 10 Home 
  hide details  
The Struggle (4k)
(20 items)
 
File Server
(12 items)
 
Lenovo G50-45
(6 items)
 
CPUGraphicsRAMOS
Athlon II X2 250u Nvidia 6150SE  2gb DDR3 1066mhz Windows 10 Home 64 bit 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
AMD A8-6410 AMD R5 Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR3L 1866 CAS10 Crucial BX100 250gb 
Optical DriveOS
DVD Windows 10 Home 
  hide details  
post #20 of 606
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Pistol View Post


We're talking about a card with a TDP lower than the GTX 580, performance of around a 690, and power draw that is only a little bit more than an HD 7970 Ghz Ed. Sorry, but I'm a tad skeptical that this is even possible on a 28nm card. In fact, I know it is not possible.

Lets see here:

GTX 680, TDP 195W
7970GHz, TDP 250W

These more or less equal each other in performance, +5%ish in average better performance with 7970GHz.

Why is it hard to believe that Nvidia could make a GPU that have 55W more headroom to match 7970GHz TDP, will beat it? Throw in Kepler architecture improvement in the mix, its not difficult to see in my eyes...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [OBR-HARDWARE]New GTX Titan benchmarks have arrived