Originally Posted by Avonosac
How is that not a fail? They add a second DVI port (great!, more connections) but make it only single link? Displayport is great, if more monitors supported it. Or the other option is an active DP to DL-DVI adapter.. with issues as far as bandwidth frequency, sounds awesome and cost.. 70-100$ usually.
You are saying it's a fail when 1080p (1200p) is still mainstream. It's not like every day normal gamers use 3 x 1440p or
3 x 1600p monitors in eyefinity.
If someone has 5760x1080p monitors, he won't need
the so called 100$ adpaters like you are saying. DVI-Single link is able to transfer 1200p resolution @ 60hz. And display ports only need a DVI to DP adapters at 15$ for 1080p or 1200p.
In my opinion, what would be the best would be 3 x DVI but that is not gonna happen, especially with more and more monitors with Display ports.Tell me what is a fail
? I think I have good points on why IT'S NOT a fail
Oh and by the way, I feel the extreme sarcasm in your post. Can you leave sarcasm and arrogance aside please?Edited by KaRLiToS - 2/13/13 at 5:33am