Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › [OFFICIAL]--- Top 30 --- Unigine 'Valley' Benchmark 1.0
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[OFFICIAL]--- Top 30 --- Unigine 'Valley' Benchmark 1.0 - Page 475

post #4741 of 13339
Updated score! Almost 100FPS! Dammit...

Koniakki
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700K@4.7Ghz ASUS ROG MAXIMUS VIII Z170 HERO Zotac Geforce GTX 1080Ti FE 32GB G.Skill TridentZ 3733@CL15 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB M.2 SSD Seagate Archive v2 8TB Seagate ST4000DM000 4TB Seagate Archive v2 8TB 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Alphacool NexXxoS Cool Answer 480 D5/UT60 W10 PRO x64 OEM DIGITAL Samsung PS-59D550 Corsair RMx 750W GOLD 
CaseMouseAudio
Thermatake Core P5 Logitech MK700/MK710 LG BH9540TW 9.1 Home Theater 
  hide details  
Reply
Koniakki
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700K@4.7Ghz ASUS ROG MAXIMUS VIII Z170 HERO Zotac Geforce GTX 1080Ti FE 32GB G.Skill TridentZ 3733@CL15 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB M.2 SSD Seagate Archive v2 8TB Seagate ST4000DM000 4TB Seagate Archive v2 8TB 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Alphacool NexXxoS Cool Answer 480 D5/UT60 W10 PRO x64 OEM DIGITAL Samsung PS-59D550 Corsair RMx 750W GOLD 
CaseMouseAudio
Thermatake Core P5 Logitech MK700/MK710 LG BH9540TW 9.1 Home Theater 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4742 of 13339
Changing the slider to performance does not reduce IQ. I could not see a single difference in the bench. You have an Nvidia card right? Check it yourself...
post #4743 of 13339
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaRLiToS View Post

Ok YungBenny, so you are confortable beating someone scores by reducing the Image Quality? While the other guy don't have the ability to do so, you will blame the AMD driver? Its a bit pretentious.

Why not be on the same level as everyone, I wonder what would be your reasonning if it was the opposite, you would be the first one to complain in PM, you know what I mean?


I personally am not, to be honest, i never EVER even thought of tweaking my ssettings. I was really proud of overclocking the crap out of my system to be the fastest 660 (non ti). BUT, idk who brought it up, and then i was like " Wait a second!... (O_O), these sneaky people on this thread!", that's when i started going back, and comparing results. Turns out that a lot of people have been using it without knowing they were "cheating" in some way. Can i blame them? No.. At the end of the day, it's something that Nvidia provides to improve performance.


If you want to make a different chart for Nvidia control panel tweakers, then you might as well create a chart for people on stock, people on air, people using water, people using LN2. Because IMO comparing someone's score on air to someone using LN2 is definitely Unfair.

I totally see your point though. But the only thing that's making people disagree with you is the fact that A LOT of people are already using it on the Thread, and people like me that only focus on overclocking are been beaten by people with lower clocks. If you can find a way to solve that problem, then i would gladly support you 100%.

And IMO the only way to solve it is to erase all the data in this thread and start all over again... tongue.gif I don't think that's a good idea.
Edited by Yungbenny911 - 5/27/13 at 9:56pm
ICE Evolution
(30 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 5930k MSI X99S SLI KRAIT Edition LGA2011-v3 MSI GTX 1070 Sea-Hawk EK MSI GTX 1070 Sea-Hawk EK 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
HyperX 16Gb DDR4 3000Mhz CL15 WD 500GB Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC ... Seagate 500GB 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC RayStorm High Performance Acetal CPU Liqui... Corsair SP 120 (x10) Thermaltake Riing 120 RGB (x6) XSPC Photon 270 Tube Reservoir Reservoir 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EK-FC Terminal DUAL Parallel - Plexi PrimoChill 1/2in Rigid PETG Tubing - 36in - Clear  Rigid Revolver Compression Fitting 3/8" x 1/2" ... Hardwarelabs Sr1 480mm Radiator (x3) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
D5 PWM PUMP (x2) Bitspower D5 / MCP655 Mod Kit V2 - Deluxe White... Bitspower Dual D5 Mod Top (Acrylic Version) - U... Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer B326HK 32" 4K IPS Corsair k70 RGB EVGA Supernova 1200 P2 Thermaltake Core X9 Snow Edition 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cyborg R.A.T 5 Gaming Mouse Xtrac Pad Ripper Mousepad Logitech z623 200w sub woofer Logitech G35 
OtherOther
Logitech c920 1080p Hd webcam Xbox One Special Edition Covert Forces Wireless... 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor Lenovo NVIDIA GeForce GTX660M 2GB  8.0GB PC3-12800 DDR3 SDRAM 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Mushkin Enhanced Atlas Series120GB SATA III MLC... 1TB 5400RPM (Storage) Blu-ray/DVD-RW Cm X-Slim 
OSMonitorKeyboardAudio
Windows 8 pro 15.6" FHD LED Glare Wedge 1920x1080 Backlit Keyboard JBL speakers 
  hide details  
Reply
ICE Evolution
(30 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 5930k MSI X99S SLI KRAIT Edition LGA2011-v3 MSI GTX 1070 Sea-Hawk EK MSI GTX 1070 Sea-Hawk EK 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
HyperX 16Gb DDR4 3000Mhz CL15 WD 500GB Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC ... Seagate 500GB 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC RayStorm High Performance Acetal CPU Liqui... Corsair SP 120 (x10) Thermaltake Riing 120 RGB (x6) XSPC Photon 270 Tube Reservoir Reservoir 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EK-FC Terminal DUAL Parallel - Plexi PrimoChill 1/2in Rigid PETG Tubing - 36in - Clear  Rigid Revolver Compression Fitting 3/8" x 1/2" ... Hardwarelabs Sr1 480mm Radiator (x3) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
D5 PWM PUMP (x2) Bitspower D5 / MCP655 Mod Kit V2 - Deluxe White... Bitspower Dual D5 Mod Top (Acrylic Version) - U... Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer B326HK 32" 4K IPS Corsair k70 RGB EVGA Supernova 1200 P2 Thermaltake Core X9 Snow Edition 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cyborg R.A.T 5 Gaming Mouse Xtrac Pad Ripper Mousepad Logitech z623 200w sub woofer Logitech G35 
OtherOther
Logitech c920 1080p Hd webcam Xbox One Special Edition Covert Forces Wireless... 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor Lenovo NVIDIA GeForce GTX660M 2GB  8.0GB PC3-12800 DDR3 SDRAM 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Mushkin Enhanced Atlas Series120GB SATA III MLC... 1TB 5400RPM (Storage) Blu-ray/DVD-RW Cm X-Slim 
OSMonitorKeyboardAudio
Windows 8 pro 15.6" FHD LED Glare Wedge 1920x1080 Backlit Keyboard JBL speakers 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4744 of 13339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koniakki View Post

Updated score! Almost 100FPS! Dammit...


Increase memory if you can.
post #4745 of 13339
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaRLiToS View Post

WHy Physycal mod shoould be dissallowed. reducing IQ is more than a problem to me.

...oh boy...I just hit 6199 with a ...physical mod???...just added a second PSU for the bottom two cards for a total of 2050w in PSUs...still can go multi up...started at 6184 per table and Karlitos has every single submission to see the progression from day one - this is the only non-HWBot thread / submission which I make and which I take seriously, but it is sad what happened today. mad.gif
post #4746 of 13339
Reducing IQ is not a problem if it's not a noticeable decrease.

That's what AMD and Nvidia do in order to optimize their cards, don't see why we wouldn't do it.

And as for more reasons, see my previous post some minutes ago.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4747 of 13339
I thought the point of most benchmarks was to test systems at their best.
I dont understand the " Performance for Benchmark Quality for games" crap.
I want games to run smooth so would choose performance and i want benchmarks to test my hardware so i would choose Quality.

Isnt the benchmark meant to show you what your hardware can do maxed out?

Is this thread about what the hardware can do maxed out?
Or is it about FPS at any cost(Quality) and therefore meaningless?
Toxic
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom x6 1100T Gigabyte ga-990fxa-ud3 Galaxy GTX 670 GC v2 8gig Gskill 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
1TB Seagate LG Super Multi Antec Kuhler h20 620 Win7 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung S24B350 Logitech G710+ Corsair HX750 CMSS 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer Mamba Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
Toxic
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom x6 1100T Gigabyte ga-990fxa-ud3 Galaxy GTX 670 GC v2 8gig Gskill 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
1TB Seagate LG Super Multi Antec Kuhler h20 620 Win7 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung S24B350 Logitech G710+ Corsair HX750 CMSS 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer Mamba Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4748 of 13339
GIMME DAT
1176Mhz/3600Mhz SLI
At Doom's Gate
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 6700K @ 4.4Ghz [Stock Voltage ] MSI Gaming M5  GTX 1080 SeahawkX @ 2100Mhz GSKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 @ 2900Mhz CL15 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS WD Velociraptor 1TB Corsair H100i Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS ROG Swift 27" 2560x1440p 165Hz G-Sync IPS ... Logitech G710+ Corsair AX860i Corsair 760T 
MouseAudio
Logitech G9x Creative Soundblaster Z  
  hide details  
Reply
At Doom's Gate
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 6700K @ 4.4Ghz [Stock Voltage ] MSI Gaming M5  GTX 1080 SeahawkX @ 2100Mhz GSKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 @ 2900Mhz CL15 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS WD Velociraptor 1TB Corsair H100i Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS ROG Swift 27" 2560x1440p 165Hz G-Sync IPS ... Logitech G710+ Corsair AX860i Corsair 760T 
MouseAudio
Logitech G9x Creative Soundblaster Z  
  hide details  
Reply
post #4749 of 13339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yungbenny911 View Post

I personally am not, to be honest, i never EVER even thought of tweaking my ssettings. I was really proud of overclocking the crap out of my system to be the fastest 660 (non ti). BUT, idk who brought it up, and then i was like " Wait a second!... (O_O), these sneaky people on this thread!", that's when i started going back, and comparing results. Turns out that a lot of people have been using it without knowing they were "cheating" in some way. Can i blame them? No.. At the end of the day, it's something that Nvidia provides to improve performance.


If you want to make a different chart for Nvidia control panel tweakers, then you might as well create a chart for people on stock, people on air, people using water, people using LN2. Because IMO comparing someone's score on air to someone using LN2 is definitely Unfair.

I totally see your point though. But the only thing that's making people disagree with you is the fact that A LOT of people are already using it on the Thread, and people like me that only focus on overclocking are been beaten by people with lower clocks. If you can find a way to solve that problem, then i would gladly support you 100%.

And IMO the only way to solve it is to erase all the data in this thread and start all over again... tongue.gif I don't think that's a good idea.

I'd voluntarily resubmit my score using stock driver setting except v sync off, the difference would be of probably 5 or 10 points, but with other peoples setups there might be a bigger gap I don't know that though. I could be one of few people that's actually messed with driver settings and windows performance mode quality, the only reason I've tried benching that was because of someone else that's benefited from doing that, that should be the only thing that's not seen as cheating since it's a personal preference on how windows looks and maybe some people actually like the old school look of windows.
Edited by Dirtylarry86 - 5/27/13 at 10:58pm
post #4750 of 13339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

There is no level playing field in the first place, AMD and Nvidia o optimizations themselves all the time and all that matters is if you can see the IQ difference, at that point you've gone too far with optimizing. Both companies could run much, MUCH, better IQ levels but it would be pointless and would ruin performance.

What it boils down to is that there's an option that optimizes texture filtering, only to such an extent that you can't see the difference in IQ. This is why it isn't cheating at all if the option is used. Disabling tesselation in say heaven is a night an day difference while I've yet to see a person who could tell a difference between a valley run with the filtering on quality or performance.

That and disallowing driver tweaks goes against pretty much every single benchmarking thread / site /competition on the net. Software just is a part of benching, nothing more to it than that. If the IQ difference can't really be seen then there's really no reason to ban anything.

And creating two separate submission lists would just fragment the benches and create more trouble for absolutely no reason while not fixing anything. A huge part of the scores are already with the tweaks, that's how it has always been. Only reason this is an issue now is that some people apparently just now learned about it...
Lol why is this debate only starting to gain alot of traction now that the 780 released lol.

Anyways, when reviewers review games they use the standard driver settings for all games and benchmarks (Why wouldn't they tweak their drivers for synthetics benchmarks for the cards they review if it's fair? They don't do it because it levels the playing field by letting Nvidia and AMD do it officially)

The point is leave it be.... It's obvious some people already ran benchmarks with tweaks and got them into the charts but allowing everyone to do it now does a disservice to all the previous people who ran the benchmarks stock. I think a separate chart should be created for people who want to tweak their cards through the driver settings, it's the only compromise that works imo.

To the people saying IQ doesn't matter its a benchmark... you're missing the point. How can you be proud of your score knowing you won by lowering your IQ to do it?
Edited by th3illusiveman - 5/27/13 at 11:15pm
Bender
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i5-2500k @ 4.6Ghz Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3 Sapphire AMD R9 290X Tri-X (1050/1300mhz)  EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 (How do you OC?) 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOS
8GB 1600Mhz OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD windows 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus MG279Q Logitech G510  Corsair TX750 CM II 690 Advanced 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
CM Sentinel Advance  some big corsair one beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro 250 Ohm SoundBlaster Z Soundcard 
  hide details  
Reply
Bender
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i5-2500k @ 4.6Ghz Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3 Sapphire AMD R9 290X Tri-X (1050/1300mhz)  EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 (How do you OC?) 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOS
8GB 1600Mhz OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD windows 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus MG279Q Logitech G510  Corsair TX750 CM II 690 Advanced 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
CM Sentinel Advance  some big corsair one beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro 250 Ohm SoundBlaster Z Soundcard 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › [OFFICIAL]--- Top 30 --- Unigine 'Valley' Benchmark 1.0