Quote:
Originally Posted by
gladiator7 
I am not assuming, just read it your self and compare the core/memory clocks given for the high scores on the Top 30 with that of stock. 3d mark 11
Edit: I think that we are talking past each other. I am not saying that these reviews sites have OCD their cards for running benchmarks, which they don't typically, what I am saying is that Top 30 scores have.
You can't compare core/memory clock speed on a GTX 680/690 to a GTX Titan....
A GTX 680 is clocked much higher than a GTX Titan, and the Titan still beats it by ~44%. An extreme example, is comparing a 3.6GHz Pentium 4 to a 3.6GHz Ivy Bridge... you just can't do it. The Ivy bridge would run circles around it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BiG StroOnZ
Yeah, they've done it and if I'm correct this isn't even the 700 series.
700 series is the mainstream chip which will not beat titan. A 780 will probably have about a $499 MSRP, and have performance inbetween the 680 and Titan.
Edited by Murlocke - 2/21/13 at 4:22am
