Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › (gamegpu) Tomb Raider benchmark
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

(gamegpu) Tomb Raider benchmark - Page 19

post #181 of 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

I just installed the game yesterday and ONLY had time to run the benchmark. If I remember correctly, it ran 42fps average @ 1080p Maxed (FXAA)
Is the benchmark performance representative of the gameplay performance? It pretty much just focuses on her hair. I'm thinking the framerate is a little smoother when the camera is pulled back during normal play. right?

 

You'll find gameplay is generally better for the most part.

War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 4670k @ 3.4ghz Asus B85M Gamer MSI Twin Frozr V R9 390X 8gb Kingston Hyper X Beast 16gb 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingOS
HGS 2.5" Sata 1tb Corsair H100i v2 4 x Corsair SP120 Quiet Windows 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Benq RL2455 Microsoft Sidewinder X4 EVGA Supernova G2 750w Corsair Carbide Air 240 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Naga Molten Edition Steel Series Guild Wars 2 Sennheiser HD201 
  hide details  
Reply
War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 4670k @ 3.4ghz Asus B85M Gamer MSI Twin Frozr V R9 390X 8gb Kingston Hyper X Beast 16gb 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingOS
HGS 2.5" Sata 1tb Corsair H100i v2 4 x Corsair SP120 Quiet Windows 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Benq RL2455 Microsoft Sidewinder X4 EVGA Supernova G2 750w Corsair Carbide Air 240 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Naga Molten Edition Steel Series Guild Wars 2 Sennheiser HD201 
  hide details  
Reply
post #182 of 363
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

Not really, the mere fact that the hardware is there doesn't mean anything. You don't take an OpenGL game that runs on NV hardware and say it runs better on NV hardware when ported over to directX. Especially when the hardware isn't even the same but some partly custom chip with a custom OS and everything running on it...
NV purposefully focused on mobile devices and GPGPU instead of consoles. Mostly due to the ridiculously low profit margins of console hardware.

Call me when

A) console hardware is actually a profitable market
B)AMD has faster GPUs than Nvidia.
7970ghz taking the crown over 6 monthes

ps3 sold 70 million units
post #183 of 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by mltms View Post

7970ghz taking the crown over 6 monthes

ps3 sold 70 million units

the amount of units sold doesn't really tell anything. The margins you get from consoles are pathetic which is why NV didn't bother.

And the for the whole time the 7970ghz was a faster card than the 680 we knew GK110 was coming, which is what I waited for. GK104 is a small chip that was used for high end cards because it performed better than expected. I didn't necessarily mean cards out at the very moment but more powerful GPUs being made by the company. Titan releasing was just a matter of time when the first GK110 shipments went out in september...
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #184 of 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

And the for the whole time the 7970ghz was a faster card than the 680 we knew GK110 was coming, which is what I waited for. GK104 is a small chip that was used for high end cards because it performed better than expected. I didn't necessarily mean cards out at the very moment but more powerful GPUs being made by the company. Titan releasing was just a matter of time when the first GK110 shipments went out in september...

GK104 sacrifices much compute performance to achieve its gaming performance. GCN Tahiti is much more balanced in that it delivers gaming performance without having to cripple compute performance as part of the trade-off.

For all the transistors that GK110 packs it should be the fastest single-GPU solution as far as gaming goes (even if it is primarily designed for GPGPU).
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K @4.4 GHz ASRock Z77 Extreme4-m ASUS GTX 670 DirectCUII TOP Patriot VIPER III 2x8 GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial m500 240 GB Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB ASUS DVD-burner Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Dell Ultrasharp U2412m Rosewill RK-9000 Cherry MX Blue SeaSonic M12II 620 Bronze 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
Rosewill R101-P-BK Logitech G100s HRT Music Streamer II -> Audinst AMP-HP -> Westone 4 
Audio
Etymotic Research ER-4P 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K @4.4 GHz ASRock Z77 Extreme4-m ASUS GTX 670 DirectCUII TOP Patriot VIPER III 2x8 GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial m500 240 GB Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB ASUS DVD-burner Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Dell Ultrasharp U2412m Rosewill RK-9000 Cherry MX Blue SeaSonic M12II 620 Bronze 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
Rosewill R101-P-BK Logitech G100s HRT Music Streamer II -> Audinst AMP-HP -> Westone 4 
Audio
Etymotic Research ER-4P 
  hide details  
Reply
post #185 of 363
Compute power, if its so important then why did nvidia choose to lower it?
AVARIS REBORN
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.4Ghz ASRock Z77 Extreme4 Galaxy GeForce GTX 670 Corsair Sniper (2x4GB) DDR3-1600  
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme SSD 240GB Antec Kuhler H2O 620 Liquid Cooling System Windows 8  DELL U2412M 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Leopold FC700R (Brown Cherry) seasonic G-550w Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech Performance MX 
Audio
Aktimate Micro 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 920 @ 3.78ghz 1.325v Asus P6T Deluxe V1 MSI GTX 570 6GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital Green 1TB LG DVD Windows 7 Acer AL22W16 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Wireless Media Desktop 1000 Antec Quattro 850w CM 690 II Plus Logitech Performance Mouse MX 
  hide details  
Reply
AVARIS REBORN
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.4Ghz ASRock Z77 Extreme4 Galaxy GeForce GTX 670 Corsair Sniper (2x4GB) DDR3-1600  
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme SSD 240GB Antec Kuhler H2O 620 Liquid Cooling System Windows 8  DELL U2412M 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Leopold FC700R (Brown Cherry) seasonic G-550w Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech Performance MX 
Audio
Aktimate Micro 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 920 @ 3.78ghz 1.325v Asus P6T Deluxe V1 MSI GTX 570 6GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital Green 1TB LG DVD Windows 7 Acer AL22W16 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Wireless Media Desktop 1000 Antec Quattro 850w CM 690 II Plus Logitech Performance Mouse MX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #186 of 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

the amount of units sold doesn't really tell anything. The margins you get from consoles are pathetic which is why NV didn't bother.

And the for the whole time the 7970ghz was a faster card than the 680 we knew GK110 was coming, which is what I waited for. GK104 is a small chip that was used for high end cards because it performed better than expected. I didn't necessarily mean cards out at the very moment but more powerful GPUs being made by the company. Titan releasing was just a matter of time when the first GK110 shipments went out in september...

7970 is not that bad in computing when its compared to latest GK110 Titan rolleyes.gif . Well 7970 is a 7 month old card tongue.gif








Haswell i3
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i3-4150 @ 3.5 GHz Asus B85M-G Rev 1.01, Bios: 2501 Integrated Intel HD 4400 2x 4GB DDR3 1600 MHz CL9 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200.14 Seagate 500 GB 2.5" Samsung DVD/RW 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H70 Windows 10 64 bit Samsung A300N 20" 1600 x 900 60Hz 5ms 19Watt PS/2 Microsoft Wired Keyboard 500 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair TX850 V2 CoolerMaster Elite 430 Black Logitech M170 
  hide details  
Reply
Haswell i3
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i3-4150 @ 3.5 GHz Asus B85M-G Rev 1.01, Bios: 2501 Integrated Intel HD 4400 2x 4GB DDR3 1600 MHz CL9 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200.14 Seagate 500 GB 2.5" Samsung DVD/RW 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H70 Windows 10 64 bit Samsung A300N 20" 1600 x 900 60Hz 5ms 19Watt PS/2 Microsoft Wired Keyboard 500 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair TX850 V2 CoolerMaster Elite 430 Black Logitech M170 
  hide details  
Reply
post #187 of 363
People here are going to looking mighty stupid when NVIDIA releases the driver and BOOM, performance magically increases......

  • As said multiple times, if Direct Compute is SOOOOO important, the 580GTX would outdo the keplar series.
  • Nvidia JUST received the game like 4 days ago....can you give them a second?
  • Show me a game where Direct Compute actually hurt the 680..... This tells me otherwise
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #188 of 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitlian View Post

7970 is not that bad in computing when its compared to latest GK110 Titan rolleyes.gif . Well 7970 is a 7 month old card tongue.gifWarning: Spoiler! (Click to show)








Different bench suite, different results.









This is why comparing compute performance like this is so stupid. It means nothing, all you should do with applications that use compute features is take the individual program you use and then check which cards perform the best in that one.

AMD is good with hashing, some OpenCL scenarios
NV is good at some more complex scenarios, CUDA

Titan on the other hand is pretty much good in everything but murders AMD cards double precision, CUDA, etc.

There's a reason AMD had to launch the W10000 to counter NV's K20 and K20X, AMD needs two chips at 350W TDP to beat a single GK110 at 235W TDP for the real compute market, the professional/supercomputer/etc. market.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #189 of 363
This game murders my 470 on Ultimate, I have to settle for 23fps with everything on Ultra except the textures on Ultimate @ 1680x1050. mad.gif
post #190 of 363
Looking at those initial benchmarks, i suppose mt 7870 XT is right in line then. The game seems to be a crash happy affair, but turning off the TressFX and tessilation seems to cut that down a bit
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i3/i5/i7 Z77 Extreme4 AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial Ballistix Sport Samsung 840 Corsair H80i Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
AOC e2343Fk Razar Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 Fractal Design R4 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i3/i5/i7 Z77 Extreme4 AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial Ballistix Sport Samsung 840 Corsair H80i Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
AOC e2343Fk Razar Blackwidow Ultimate Seasonic X650 Fractal Design R4 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PC Gaming
Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › (gamegpu) Tomb Raider benchmark