Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [EG] Nvidia Apologizes To Tomb Raider PC Players.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[EG] Nvidia Apologizes To Tomb Raider PC Players. - Page 31

post #301 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade 117 View Post

While there was no real particualr reason other than AMD finally developing an engine that fully utilizes their gpu rendering ability; I think that its really coming down to all the Nvidia fans getting butt hurt because there is finally something that Nvidia cards struggle to run effectively

Yeah, like the way Ati struggles to run the hair effects on Alice Madness. Oh wait, it can't run the hair effects at all can it? biggrin.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0UBtzKRUKI
post #302 of 332
I'm pretty sure Physx just runs on the cpu for Alice when you have an AMD card. You dont need any Nvidia card for the hair.
Bubbles
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3570k @4.7 GA-z77x-ud5h Crossfire 7950's / Heatkiller GPU-X³ 79X0 16gb Samsung 30nm  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Samsung F3 OCZ Vertex 3 XSPC Raystorm EK Coolstream 360 + XSPC RX240 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows 8 Pro Crossover Q27 CM Quick Fire Rapid (Reds) NZXT Switch 810 
Mouse
Roccat Savu  
  hide details  
Reply
Bubbles
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3570k @4.7 GA-z77x-ud5h Crossfire 7950's / Heatkiller GPU-X³ 79X0 16gb Samsung 30nm  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Samsung F3 OCZ Vertex 3 XSPC Raystorm EK Coolstream 360 + XSPC RX240 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows 8 Pro Crossover Q27 CM Quick Fire Rapid (Reds) NZXT Switch 810 
Mouse
Roccat Savu  
  hide details  
Reply
post #303 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade 117 View Post

While there was no real particualr reason other than AMD finally developing an engine that fully utilizes their gpu rendering ability; I think that its really coming down to all the Nvidia fans getting butt hurt because there is finally something that Nvidia cards struggle to run effectively

Enjoy
http://hardocp.com/article/2013/03/20/tomb_raider_video_card_performance_iq_review/1

I posted this in another thread...but I feel some people need the clarity
Quote:
Our most enjoyable gameplay experiences were at 1920x1080 with 4X SSAA enabled on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI and AMD Radeon HD 7970 CrossFire. At these settings the AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition CrossFire averaged 51.6 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI 31.8% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition CrossFire at these settings. It had an average framerate of 68 FPS. We were able to complete the entire mission with virtually no lag, and no visual degradation.

OR
Quote:
When we brought the resolution up to 2560x1600 there was a large performance drop with SSAA enabled. At this resolution with all graphics options enabled at the highest setting with, the AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition CrossFire averaged 59.3 FPS. During the run through there were no places that felt unplayble or laggy. While we were in control of the character, the framerate stayed around 60 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI was 22.8% faster with an average framerate of 72.8 FPS.

OR
Quote:
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI was the more powerful solution at 1920x1080 with 4X SSAA enabled, with an average framerate of 68 FPS. At 2560x1600 with FXAA enabled, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI was again faster with a 72.8 average framerate.

OR
Quote:
When running the AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition at 1080p with 2X SSAA and the highest in-game settings selected, it had an average framerate of 35.5 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 was 25.1% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition and had an average framerate of 44.4 FPS.
Quote:
In our highest playable tests, these two video cards were playable at 1920x1080 with FXAA enabled with all other graphics options set to ultimate. When we enabled 2X SSAA the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost performed 30.3% slower than with just FXAA enabled. It had an average FPS of 27.1 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 was 10.7% faster than this, with an average framerate of 30 FPS

OR
Quote:
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti averaged 41.5 FPS with FXAA enabled at 1080p. This was the highest playable setting for this video card. The AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition was not fast enough to perform with all settings at ultimate at 1080p. The Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition averaged 34.6 FPS with everything on ultimate. This is 16.6% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at these settings.

Then look at TressFX performance hit. 22.2% hit on 7970, 10.4% on Nvidia. After seeing those threads about NVIDIA's 600 series is now weak because Compute performance...lol complete garbag
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #304 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

Enjoy
http://hardocp.com/article/2013/03/20/tomb_raider_video_card_performance_iq_review/1

I posted this in another thread...but I feel some people need the clarity
OR
OR
OR

OR
Then look at TressFX performance hit. 22.2% hit on 7970, 10.4% on Nvidia. After seeing those threads about NVIDIA's 600 series is now weak because Compute performance...lol complete garbag

Do you own the game?
If so please post your benchmark maxed out settings.

Thanx.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 7700K  Asus Rog Maximus IX Hero  Gigabyte GTX1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance LED CMU16GX4M2C3200C16, 16GB ... 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB Crucial MX200 LG Dual Layer DVD Writer Corsair H110i GTX 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro 64Bit LG LG 34UC79G 144Hz Logitech G910 Orion Spark Cooler Master Vanguard 1200w Platinum 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Air 540 Mionix Naos 7000 Mionix Alioth Large Logitech G933 Artemis Spectrum 
Audio
Creative MegaWorks 550 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 7700K  Asus Rog Maximus IX Hero  Gigabyte GTX1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance LED CMU16GX4M2C3200C16, 16GB ... 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB Crucial MX200 LG Dual Layer DVD Writer Corsair H110i GTX 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro 64Bit LG LG 34UC79G 144Hz Logitech G910 Orion Spark Cooler Master Vanguard 1200w Platinum 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Air 540 Mionix Naos 7000 Mionix Alioth Large Logitech G933 Artemis Spectrum 
Audio
Creative MegaWorks 550 
  hide details  
Reply
post #305 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clockster View Post

Do you own the game?
If so please post your benchmark maxed out settings.

Thanx.

I do. I'll have to when I get home.

then again, i could use this same rebuttal to every other "Praise AMD" thread
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #306 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

I do. I'll have to when I get home.

Awesome. Thank you
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 7700K  Asus Rog Maximus IX Hero  Gigabyte GTX1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance LED CMU16GX4M2C3200C16, 16GB ... 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB Crucial MX200 LG Dual Layer DVD Writer Corsair H110i GTX 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro 64Bit LG LG 34UC79G 144Hz Logitech G910 Orion Spark Cooler Master Vanguard 1200w Platinum 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Air 540 Mionix Naos 7000 Mionix Alioth Large Logitech G933 Artemis Spectrum 
Audio
Creative MegaWorks 550 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 7700K  Asus Rog Maximus IX Hero  Gigabyte GTX1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance LED CMU16GX4M2C3200C16, 16GB ... 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB Crucial MX200 LG Dual Layer DVD Writer Corsair H110i GTX 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro 64Bit LG LG 34UC79G 144Hz Logitech G910 Orion Spark Cooler Master Vanguard 1200w Platinum 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Air 540 Mionix Naos 7000 Mionix Alioth Large Logitech G933 Artemis Spectrum 
Audio
Creative MegaWorks 550 
  hide details  
Reply
post #307 of 332
There is a big difference in performance

post #308 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8mm View Post

There is a big difference in performance
1000
1000

just out of curiosity, where did you get that bar graph from?
Edited by lacrossewacker - 3/20/13 at 3:48pm
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #309 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8mm View Post

There is a big difference in performance

So yeah, you forgot one very important note that goes with that graph.
Quote:
The AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition was playable at 1920x1080 with FXAA enabled. All other graphics options were enabled at the highest setting, including TressFX. The Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition averaged 50.4 FPS at these settings. With 2X SSAA enabled the framerate dropped in to the mid 30's, and was a little too slow for us to call it playable. We had to settle for only using FXAA on this video card. We simply were unable to turn on either 2X or 4X SSAA while running TressFX. The added lag made the game too slow, and created environments where we could not successfully kill enemies or navigate through puzzles. Still, we felt that FXAA provided us an alternative to using no AA. We will compare how each video card does with each level of aliasing on shortly, and the image quality that it will provide.]

Please try to be a little more objective in the future. That is not an apples to apples comparison you're trying to pass off as being a win for AMD.
Upstairs Rig
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4770k Asus Maximus VI Hero evga 1080 Ti with Hybrid mod Corsair Vengeance Pro 2133 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO 500gb WD Caviar Black Corsair h100i GTX Windows 8.1 64bit 
MonitorPowerCase
xb280hk EVGA Supernova 1000 G2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Upstairs Rig
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4770k Asus Maximus VI Hero evga 1080 Ti with Hybrid mod Corsair Vengeance Pro 2133 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO 500gb WD Caviar Black Corsair h100i GTX Windows 8.1 64bit 
MonitorPowerCase
xb280hk EVGA Supernova 1000 G2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #310 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

just out of curiosity, where did you get that bar graph from?

Here

http://www.techspot.com/review/645-tomb-raider-performance/page4.html
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [EG] Nvidia Apologizes To Tomb Raider PC Players.