Overclock.net banner

Newest batch of 3570K's OCing like crazy

58K views 614 replies 132 participants last post by  materijalmen 
#1 ·
See less See more
3
#2 ·
Why won't those idiots post the batch number
redface.gif
I want to see if it's similar to mine, which is also quite new.
 
#3 ·
kind of pointless without batch #'s, guess it's a secret...or fake
 
#4 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott1541 View Post

Why won't those idiots post the batch number
redface.gif
I want to see if it's similar to mine, which is also quite new.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbiker033 View Post

kind of pointless without batch #'s, guess it's a secret...or fake
Was thinking the same thing while reading the thread. Im going to MC tomorrow and would love to look for this magical batch
 
#5 ·
I'm pretty sure my 3770k could do the same with HT turned off. So I guess 3570k hasn't had a proper golden batch unti now.
 
#8 ·
I'm kind of tempted to make an account and see if the guy will PM me the number, although I'm probably not the first person to think of this and he'll probably have 10,000 messages asking for it
rolleyes.gif
 
#9 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Look at the temps tho. Your 3770K would only hit 76C in prime at 5Ghz?
It would go below ambient with sufficient cooling. It is kind of hard to say without knowing what cooling he used.
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Says in his first post. Those are air runs
I guess I missed it the first time I looked. I blame lack of sleep.
biggrin.gif

Those temps are pretty good but I'm still not sure as HT raises the temps with around 10°C.

Edit: And actually the max core temp in that screenshot is 85°C unless I'm hallucinating now. Under IBT it would be +5°C and imagining that it was a 3770k with HT on it would hit 100°C. So nothing special it seems.
 
#14 ·
You guys should take into account two things:
1) Those were only short prime runs. It may need a lot more voltage to be stable
2) The temps are pretty much normal considering that it is a 3570k
 
#15 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukkooh View Post

You guys should take into account two things:
1) Those were only short prime runs. It may need a lot more voltage to be stable
2) The temps are pretty much normal considering that it is a 3570k
Are those temps normal for a 3570K 5ghz on... air?
If it's stable in p95 for an hour it might need more voltage but not "a lot more", if it was so far from stable it would have BSOD'd or failed before 1 hour, at least it was like that with my experiences.
 
#16 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMHernandez View Post

Are those temps normal for a 3570K 5ghz on... air?
If it's stable in p95 for an hour it might need more voltage but not "a lot more", if it was so far from stable it would have BSOD'd or failed before 1 hour, at least it was like that with my experiences.
With that voltage, yes. And FYI a chip can crash even after 16 hours of prime.
 
#17 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukkooh View Post

With that voltage, yes. And FYI a chip can crash even after 16 hours of prime.
Yes, it can, and an OC that fails after 16 hours of prime is pretty much stable, you can add more voltage but it will be a very small increment needed. Even in the Sandy stable club they only require 12 hour runs.
Quote:
1. 12 HOURS+* STANDARD BLEND or CUSTOM BLEND with UPTO 80/90% of YOUR AVAILABLE RAM*
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukkooh View Post

You guys should take into account two things:
1) Those were only short prime runs. It may need a lot more voltage to be stable
2) The temps are pretty much normal considering that it is a 3570k
I've NEVER seen temps that low with a stock tim 3570K at 5Ghz on prime. He even did a 5.6Ghz run on air

 
#19 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

I've NEVER seen temps that low with a stock tim 3570K at 5Ghz on prime.
While there are many who run around 4.8@1.35-1.40 with temps around that. I agree with the voltage being awesome but not with the temps. And even the voltage doesn't imply that Intel has finally figured out the manufacturing process. This is only one chip. We'll have to see more chips overclocking like this before rushing into conclusions.
 
#22 ·
I simply do not believe this at all!

No way that An IVY chip on air could produce "ACCURATE" temps below 70C at 1.55Vcore on air. The motherboard does not matter.

This is probably a snapshot of the IVY of what I call the IVY valley. Right before the surge to 100c!

I have never even been able to achieve this at -70c on Dice with the 20 or so chips I have owned!
 
#23 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electroneng View Post

I simply do not believe this at all!

No way that An IVY chip on air could produce "ACCURATE" temps below 70C at 1.55Vcore on air. The motherboard does not matter.

This is probably a snapshot of the IVY of what I call the IVY valley. Right before the surge to 100c!

I have never even been able to achieve this at -70c on Dice with the 20 or so chips I have owned!
Would that be true if he only booted as well? All other SS shows the cpu under load but the 5.6 ghz doesn't...
Actually curious, I don't trust those screenshots by themselves either, would be nice to get CPU-Z validation and such.
 
#24 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMHernandez View Post

Would that be true if he only booted as well? All other SS shows the cpu under load but the 5.6 ghz doesn't...
Actually curious, I don't trust those screenshots by themselves either, would be nice to get CPU-Z validation and such.
5.6ghz probably just a suicide run. 1.5v with air isnt good
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top