Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [Hardocp] Tomb Raider benchmarked
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Hardocp] Tomb Raider benchmarked - Page 3

post #21 of 161
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/AMD-Radeon-Hardware-255597/Tests/Tomb-Raider-PC-Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1058878/

Yeah thats why i dont trust any review site anymore rolleyes.gif
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
post #22 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhell View Post

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/AMD-Radeon-Hardware-255597/Tests/Tomb-Raider-PC-Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1058878/

Yeah thats why i dont trust any review site anymore rolleyes.gif

That review was made before any driver updates, how it is relevant to the situation here?
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhell View Post

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/AMD-Radeon-Hardware-255597/Tests/Tomb-Raider-PC-Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1058878/

Yeah thats why i dont trust any review site anymore rolleyes.gif

i can't read that, but it's outdated
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

That review was made before any driver updates, how it is relevant to the situation here?

Lol i dont care about the nvidia results. I care why 7970 cf is so low. I use the same settings as them and i average 65-70 fps. Thats why i care
Edited by sugarhell - 3/20/13 at 2:15pm
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhell View Post

Lol i dont care about the nvidia results. I care why 7970 cf is so low. I use the same settings us them and i average 65-70 fps. Thats why i care

Shadows are set to normal in that review. Can't tell if they are actually using SSAA or FXAA as one thing says 4x SSAA (same as in HOCP's) but in their charts it says FXAA. I don't see any Crossfire or SLI in there either. Not sure why that review is relevant for either side.



Also this is gameplay, not the benchmark. The benchmark really does not adequately test the settings at all.
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 161
why do nvidia owners ignore this
Quote:
AMD informed us it had a driver in the works, but it would be a while, and had no ETA. The best driver at game launch to use was Catalyst 13.2 Beta 7, which was the latest driver out at the time
post #27 of 161
I don't have faith in [H]ardOCP since their reviews are clearly biased and really I just can imagine a reviewer speaking and c%#p coming out of is mouth...

AnandTech/Tom's Hardware/[H]ardOCP = Intel biased - [H]ardOCP/AnandTech(?) = prefer Nvidia

I wish Nvidia died and not 3DFX or atleast S3 Graphics, they were really innovative compared to Nvidia. S3 Graphics were bought by HTC in 2011(thumb.gif)...

We now have only Intel and Nvidia, too bad that Cyrix died and that Rise din't had a success with their first processor that was very innovative but it was a sort of a flop because of architectural design flaws so it went down. Its now so slow...
post #28 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by mltms View Post

why do nvidia owners ignore this

Because they tested with 13.3 Beta 2?
Quote:
For the AMD video cards we are using Catalyst 13.3 BETA 2, dated March 15th, 2013. This driver version includes its own Catalyst Application Profile or CAP, so we will not be installing one separately.

AMD doesn't really seem to be getting much performance value for their Gaming Evolved money - isn't this the third or fourth in a row that Nvidia was better once driver fixes were implemented (or even at launch)?
Edited by Forceman - 3/20/13 at 2:30pm
post #29 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by mltms View Post

why do nvidia owners ignore this

Failing to see your point. Check the first benchmark thread for Tomb Raider, AMD owners completely ignored the fact that Nvidia wasn't even given the game code until a few days before so no driver was able to be released. Nvidia has only released one driver for TR, same as AMD, so they are on equal ground.

Not to mention people are always complaining about how "future drivers" shouldn't be taken into account. By this logic we can just assume the GTX Titan completely dominates everything in a year because it will have newer drivers released and the 680 and 7970 will be crap cards because the Titan got updated.

That's just stupid logic.
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
Lawl Mark II
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 @ 5ghz (air) Z77 Extreme6 SLI GTX 660 Ti SC 3GB (1228/1734) Patriot Viper 3 16GB 2133mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 3 128GB XIGMATEK Dark Knight II Windows 7 Ultimate Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
CM Silent Pro 1000W Cyborg RAT 7 Razer Goliathus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
post #30 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by mltms View Post

why do nvidia owners ignore this

why did AMD owners ignore this?
Quote:
"Unfortunately, Nvidia didn't receive final game code until this past weekend which substantially decreased stability, image quality and performance over a build we were previously provided,"
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [Hardocp] Tomb Raider benchmarked