Originally Posted by EastCoast
There is no proof that lowering the frame rate of CF is the actual frames per second one is seeing. Right now we are only seeing them removed for the sake of it. Runt, is nothing more then a screen tear in between frames with a frame. There is no actual causation to imply or suggest that frame rates are reduced.
Here is the actual video.
At 11:00 to 11:48 it is explained that the so called runt (nv term) is just a frame found in a screen tear (which isn't a full frame). I also notice it was said that 'maybe' it has an effect performance. Nothing shown that it does.At 12:50 to 13:44 so called runts (nv term) are taken out of the Fraps result because it was decided they adversely effect performance. Not that it was proven that the frame rate counter results and averages are wrong.Edited by EastCoast - 4/11/13 at 6:24am