Originally Posted by DoomDash
While I never played BC2 I really don't see any advantages to BF3 over BF4. It sounds like some of your major complaints all have to do with maps, which could change. The netcode might get fixed we'll see.
Personally I don't like ANY maps in BF3 over BF4. The only really good one was Caspian Border. Certainly locker is better than Metro even if it is trash.
I don't think the game is perfect but it certainly has an extreme amount of small advantages over BF3.
BC2 is the best Battlefield in my experience,or atleast the one that suits me the most.More infantry based,guns take around 10 bullets to kill hence you get enough reaction time if somebody unaccurate is shooting you from behind while in BF4 you get killed in under half a second.I prefer BF3 in terms of maps and gameplay aswell.Maps like Grand Bazaar,Operation Firestorm,Sharqi Peninsula,Metro,Noshahrn Canals,Gulf of Oman,Kharg Island are amazing.There are only vanilla and first expansion pack,I love Alborz Mountains from Armored kill and the Aftermath maps are amazing,Talah Market
, End Game maps are all-around good.While in BF4,I only enjoy Zavod 311 because it caters infantry combat while vehicles are definetely not balanced on other maps.If i'll be tanking,I love other maps because I simply destroy everybody,always going on some crazy 20-0 streaks. I enjoy rush aswell and Damavand Peak was awesome map for that.No map like it in BF4,maybe Goldmud Railway but still - not my Damavand Peak.
The gunplay is better because it just requires so much more skill.Everybody can be accurate in BF4,guns are laser accurate,how is it possible for an AEK-971 to be so easy to control?I'm not super accurate and god-like with my recoil management but I can easily demolish people at longer distances with the AEK hence why it's my most played gun.You could run across the map and no one would have hit you simply because they aren't enough skilled to hit you with that recoil and suppression if they were being shot at.