Originally Posted by Slightly skewed
We've asked and I'm pretty sure he's been thread banned a few times already. Best to ignore really.
Said the guy who has done nothing in this thread but argue or insult people.
Originally Posted by daguardian
I posted no COD videos just read all your incorrect
BC is a spin-off of BF - commander would not have worked well
Name the BF games you have played and the hours in each please...
Were you ever on EAUK Battlefield forums?
I'm no EA fan because of the way they have taken studios like DICE and destroyed the devs visions, and things like closing 10 year old forums to quell popular opinion(and replace it with Battlelog.....no words describe that cesspit) They screwed the community in BC2 and BF2 Alpha's and Beta's - so many broken promises and lies - but this was most likely due to EA as well.. but I digress, its history and all I want is to look forward to hopefully seeing a better BF4.
I was hoping, as this is OCN, that posters such as yourself would be kindly told to go away, so this thread would not turn into a "whichisthebestFPSthread" like every other forum....
P L E A S E
Why would I hang on a .uk site when Im swedish? DICE is swedish too. Besides, why would I hang on a battlefield forum in the first place?
Why wouldnt Commander work in Bad Company? Spinoff is not an excuse for "could not work". Give me solid facts as to why.
List our game hours? Why? Measure our weens?
1942 and its expansions ~100h
BF2 and expansions ~400, 90% of which were PR
Bad Company ~50h on PS3
BF 1943 ~30h on PS3
BC2 Vietnam ~50h