Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › [Official] Battlefield 4 Information & Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Official] Battlefield 4 Information & Discussion Thread - Page 21

post #201 of 29735
Yay, so Singleplayer will have prettier graphics, nicer effects etc and MP will just be tacked on with some poor effects and laggy gamepway like bf3.
post #202 of 29735
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamzta09 View Post

Yay, so Singleplayer will have prettier graphics, nicer effects etc and MP will just be tacked on with some poor effects and laggy gamepway like bf3.

So you think Battlefield 3 Multiplayer has poor graphics/effects?

Please find me another first person shooter multiplayer with 32 players or above that offers the graphic quality from BF3. You have to be kidding, Battlefield 3 looks awesome.

Sure destruction is a bit capped in Multiplayer compared to BFBC2, but that was expected so it could run decently on most PC's.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 7700k ASUS Maximus IX Formula EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666MHz CL16 Samsung 950 PRO M.2 512GB WD Red 4TB WD Green 1TB 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 PRO ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q Corsair K70 RGB MX Brown 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA Supernova T2 850W Phanteks Enthoo Luxe Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum Razer Destructor 2 
AudioAudioAudio
Beyerdynamic DT-770 PRO 80ohm JDS O2+ODAC Zalman MIC-M1 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 7700k ASUS Maximus IX Formula EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666MHz CL16 Samsung 950 PRO M.2 512GB WD Red 4TB WD Green 1TB 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 PRO ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q Corsair K70 RGB MX Brown 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA Supernova T2 850W Phanteks Enthoo Luxe Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum Razer Destructor 2 
AudioAudioAudio
Beyerdynamic DT-770 PRO 80ohm JDS O2+ODAC Zalman MIC-M1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #203 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcuestag View Post

So you think Battlefield 3 Multiplayer has poor graphics/effects?

Please find me another first person shooter multiplayer with 32 players or above that offers the graphic quality from BF3. You have to be kidding, Battlefield 3 looks awesome.

Sure destruction is a bit capped in Multiplayer compared to BFBC2, but that was expected so it could run decently on most PC's.

Compared to Singleplayer BF3 most of the time looks like a 2006 game.

Do I REALLY need to re-post my screenshots of how godawful the game looks in multiplayer?

And using the really really pathetic excuse of "Please find me another game" is just... well pathetic as hell, because there is no other company that produces 32+ player multiplayer games for the PC or Consoles. Planetside 2 looks pretty damn good and it has, what was it, 2000 players per map?

Having good visuals in SP and not having those same visuals in MP is just poor and lazy. Nothing else. But wouldnt surprise me if youre one of those who think the BF3 destruction puts strain on your hardware just because its multiplayer... no it doesnt, theyre triggered events with particle effects and not dynamic like red faction.
Edited by hamzta09 - 4/2/13 at 12:02pm
post #204 of 29735
Thread Starter 
Planetside 2 has decent graphics, but have you seen how poor it runs under heavy battles, even on the best cards and cpu's of the market?

The reason they don't add all the visuals in Multiplayer is to prevent that from happening, and honestly, you're telling me to compare it to a 2006 game, fine, look at Battlefield 2, now tell me it looks like BF3. lachen.gif
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 7700k ASUS Maximus IX Formula EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666MHz CL16 Samsung 950 PRO M.2 512GB WD Red 4TB WD Green 1TB 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 PRO ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q Corsair K70 RGB MX Brown 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA Supernova T2 850W Phanteks Enthoo Luxe Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum Razer Destructor 2 
AudioAudioAudio
Beyerdynamic DT-770 PRO 80ohm JDS O2+ODAC Zalman MIC-M1 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 7700k ASUS Maximus IX Formula EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* EVGA GTX1080 Ti *soon* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2666MHz CL16 Samsung 950 PRO M.2 512GB WD Red 4TB WD Green 1TB 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 PRO ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q Corsair K70 RGB MX Brown 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA Supernova T2 850W Phanteks Enthoo Luxe Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum Razer Destructor 2 
AudioAudioAudio
Beyerdynamic DT-770 PRO 80ohm JDS O2+ODAC Zalman MIC-M1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #205 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcuestag View Post

Planetside 2 has decent graphics, but have you seen how poor it runs under heavy battles, even on the best cards and cpu's of the market?

The reason they don't add all the visuals in Multiplayer is to prevent that from happening, and honestly, you're telling me to compare it to a 2006 game, fine, look at Battlefield 2, now tell me it looks like BF3. lachen.gif

Stop being so silly.

Heavy Battle = hundreds of people.
Heavy battle in bf3 = 10 people.

Big difference, Planetside 2 runs smooth and loooks good under "heavy" battles whereas BF3 runs and looks pretty bad no matter, TDM runs good, the rest not as much, esp not the newer maps which are unoptimized pieces of ..


Bf2 vs Bf3.
Well Bf3 isnt so far ahead:

http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/4519/bf320130323065021791.jpg
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/1948/bf320130310005713088.jpg
http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/8489/bf320130126053925297.jpg
http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/1953/bf320130323065158842.jpg
post #206 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcuestag View Post

So you think Battlefield 3 Multiplayer has poor graphics/effects?

Please find me another first person shooter multiplayer with 32 players or above that offers the graphic quality from BF3. You have to be kidding, Battlefield 3 looks awesome.

Sure destruction is a bit capped in Multiplayer compared to BFBC2, but that was expected so it could run decently on most PC's.

People like him won't be content unless there's a option available that he can't run. Only then will it truly be next gen. TIL a 64 player battle is really only 10 players.
Form from chaos
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4770K @ 4.6 ASUS ROG HERO 670 SLI 8GB TEAM DDR3 2600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung Pro 128GB LG Blu Ray Win 8.1 64 245BW 
PowerCase
Corsair1000W Lian Li tech bench 
  hide details  
Reply
Form from chaos
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4770K @ 4.6 ASUS ROG HERO 670 SLI 8GB TEAM DDR3 2600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung Pro 128GB LG Blu Ray Win 8.1 64 245BW 
PowerCase
Corsair1000W Lian Li tech bench 
  hide details  
Reply
post #207 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slightly skewed View Post

People like him won't be content unless there's a option available that he can't run. Only then will it truly be next gen. TIL a 64 player battle is really only 10 players.

Uhm.
How about actually not bringing up filth and more lies in your posts?

64 players arent ever battling together in BF3, youre all spread out, so a big battle in BF3 consists usually of 10 players. You never see 60 player sin the same battle (area) like you do in Planetside.
post #208 of 29735
your screenshots like good, they look way better than BF2!
Easy V3
(17 items)
 
12 Pack
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4820k Asus Rampage IV BE evga 1080ti FE w/ hybrid kit 16 GB G.Skill Trident X 2400mhz  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 EVO 120gb Samsung 840 EVO 1TB Samsung Blu-ray Corsair H110 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
windows 10 Asus PG278Q Ducky Shine 3 - blue led - cherry mx browns Seasonic Platinum-1000 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Dimastech Easy V3 Mionix NAOS 8200 Mionix Ensis 320 titanium HD  
Other
audio technica ATH-A900X 
  hide details  
Reply
Easy V3
(17 items)
 
12 Pack
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4820k Asus Rampage IV BE evga 1080ti FE w/ hybrid kit 16 GB G.Skill Trident X 2400mhz  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 EVO 120gb Samsung 840 EVO 1TB Samsung Blu-ray Corsair H110 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
windows 10 Asus PG278Q Ducky Shine 3 - blue led - cherry mx browns Seasonic Platinum-1000 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Dimastech Easy V3 Mionix NAOS 8200 Mionix Ensis 320 titanium HD  
Other
audio technica ATH-A900X 
  hide details  
Reply
post #209 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamzta09 View Post

64 players arent ever battling together in BF3, youre all spread out, so a big battle in BF3 consists usually of 10 players. You never see 60 player sin the same battle (area) like you do in Planetside.

Wut? Pretty sure you see that in rush and possibly capture the flag.
Peon
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
IvyBridge 3770K 3.5GHz - 4.2GHz Gigabyte UD5H-WB Wi-Fi AMD Sapphire Radeon 7970 1125/1575 w/Accelero X... AMD Sapphire Radeon 7970 Vapor-X 1125/1575 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance LP 2TB Seagate Barracuda 600GB Western Digital Black 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (OS/Apps/Origin) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Steam dedicated) Cooler Master Hyper 212+ Windows 8 x64 Pro Razer Black Widow 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
SeaSonic 1050W X Series Gold + HAF-X Razer Naga SteelSeries 4HD 
  hide details  
Reply
Peon
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
IvyBridge 3770K 3.5GHz - 4.2GHz Gigabyte UD5H-WB Wi-Fi AMD Sapphire Radeon 7970 1125/1575 w/Accelero X... AMD Sapphire Radeon 7970 Vapor-X 1125/1575 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
16GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance LP 2TB Seagate Barracuda 600GB Western Digital Black 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (OS/Apps/Origin) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Steam dedicated) Cooler Master Hyper 212+ Windows 8 x64 Pro Razer Black Widow 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
SeaSonic 1050W X Series Gold + HAF-X Razer Naga SteelSeries 4HD 
  hide details  
Reply
post #210 of 29735
Quote:
Originally Posted by rageofthepeon View Post

Wut? Pretty sure you see that in rush and possibly capture the flag.

I only play rush since conquest is just a bunch of headless chickens running towards objectives without any sort of thought, so atleast rush has some kind of simulated teamwork.

But really now, Rush? Really? The Rush maps are rather small, so obviously theres more people tight together, but the maps are thus much smaller, most of the time TDM sized.
Meaning Planetside 2 still wins in terms of scale <-> visuals ratio.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PC Gaming
Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › [Official] Battlefield 4 Information & Discussion Thread