Originally Posted by kcuestag
So you think Battlefield 3 Multiplayer has poor graphics/effects?
Please find me another first person shooter multiplayer with 32 players or above that offers the graphic quality from BF3. You have to be kidding, Battlefield 3 looks awesome.
Sure destruction is a bit capped in Multiplayer compared to BFBC2, but that was expected so it could run decently on most PC's.
Compared to Singleplayer BF3 most of the time looks like a 2006 game.
Do I REALLY need to re-post my screenshots of how godawful the game looks in multiplayer?
And using the really really pathetic excuse of "Please find me another game" is just... well pathetic as hell, because there is no other company that produces 32+ player multiplayer games for the PC or Consoles. Planetside 2 looks pretty damn good and it has, what was it, 2000 players per map?
Having good visuals in SP and not having those same visuals in MP is just poor and lazy. Nothing else. But wouldnt surprise me if youre one of those who think the BF3 destruction puts strain on your hardware just because its multiplayer... no it doesnt, theyre triggered events with particle effects and not dynamic like red faction.Edited by hamzta09 - 4/2/13 at 12:02pm