Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › [Official] The Qnix/X-Star 1440p Monitor Club
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Official] The Qnix/X-Star 1440p Monitor Club - Page 1179

post #11781 of 25911
Iam getting ready to order today is it worth the extra for the pixel perfect model. And are there any difference between the x-star and the qnix. The x-star seem to be 299 and the qnix seem to be anywhere from 330 to 400.
Worse than crack.
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3570k Asrock z77 extreme4 Saphire R9 290 Samsung green 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 ssd Samsung f3 spinpoint Win8 pro X-star 2560x1440 27in 
KeyboardCaseMouseMouse Pad
Microsoft x4 Sidewinder Haf 922 Razor Naga Fragmat 
  hide details  
Reply
Worse than crack.
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3570k Asrock z77 extreme4 Saphire R9 290 Samsung green 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 ssd Samsung f3 spinpoint Win8 pro X-star 2560x1440 27in 
KeyboardCaseMouseMouse Pad
Microsoft x4 Sidewinder Haf 922 Razor Naga Fragmat 
  hide details  
Reply
post #11782 of 25911
Quote:
Originally Posted by conzilla View Post

Iam getting ready to order today is it worth the extra for the pixel perfect model. And are there any difference between the x-star and the qnix. The x-star seem to be 299 and the qnix seem to be anywhere from 330 to 400.

1) No. You can still have a few dead pixels with PP and they won't replace. The non-PP tend to be alright, anyway.

2) No. The Qnix and XStar are identical. Go for the cheapest.
post #11783 of 25911
So I ordered a X-Star from dream-seller and so far everything is really great. No BLB, No dead pixels...goes to 96hz but starts showing green lines at 120hz.

HOWEVER, even though it seems like there is no BLB...there is this WIERD glow like effect when i start viewing the monitor at different angles...i can't pin point what it is but it starts to glow especially on blacks. Almost like an off balance white type of glow. Any idea what this might be? I was under the impression these monitors are PLS similar to IPS which have great viewing angles.
post #11784 of 25911
I see the x-star is $299 right now and the qnix is a little more. Do prices on these monitors ever drop lower than this, or is the about the lowest I could expect? I'd also only be interested in the matte version.
The War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5 MSI 980 ti 6G 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Intel SSD 480GB Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 64 bit 39" 1920x1080 
PowerCase
EVGA SuperNOVA G2 650 Fractal Design Define R5 
  hide details  
Reply
The War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5 MSI 980 ti 6G 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Intel SSD 480GB Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 64 bit 39" 1920x1080 
PowerCase
EVGA SuperNOVA G2 650 Fractal Design Define R5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #11785 of 25911
Definitely get the X-star, they really have minimal bleeding compared to the QNIX's. I had both and they are the same exact monitor. The X-star from dream-seller actually seems better built.
post #11786 of 25911
Quote:
Originally Posted by razaice View Post

I see the x-star is $299 right now and the qnix is a little more. Do prices on these monitors ever drop lower than this, or is the about the lowest I could expect? I'd also only be interested in the matte version.
Matte was recently $279. But there seems to be no rhyme or reason to it. I would just buy now instead of waiting a month to hopefully save $20. But thats me.
550D
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2700K Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H EVGA GTX 970 ACX 2.0+ SSC 4 x 4GB Samsung Green 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial 240gb Samsung EVO 250gb Corsair H80 Win7 Ultimate 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Qnix 2560x1440p Quickfire TK MX Brown XFX 750w Black Edition Corsair 550D 
MouseMouse Pad
Lefty Deathadder X Trac Ripper XXL 
  hide details  
Reply
550D
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2700K Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H EVGA GTX 970 ACX 2.0+ SSC 4 x 4GB Samsung Green 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial 240gb Samsung EVO 250gb Corsair H80 Win7 Ultimate 64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Qnix 2560x1440p Quickfire TK MX Brown XFX 750w Black Edition Corsair 550D 
MouseMouse Pad
Lefty Deathadder X Trac Ripper XXL 
  hide details  
Reply
post #11787 of 25911
Greetings everyone.

Just got my QNIX and I LOVE it. Bright and beautiful. poor stand, but the stand isn't why we buy them.

I am wondering how 3 of these in surround mode on two EVGA GTX 780ti SC would fare. Anyone have any benchmarks on this? I bought this monitor along with those 2 cards and I kinda wanna try the three way surround.
post #11788 of 25911
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightsout View Post

I don't have these issues with my 780. As far as the 290 artifacting any gpu will do that with too high an OC. 290 just has small amount of OC room on air because of heat.

it's not because of heat, or being oc'ed too high, well it is because of being oc'ed too high but not because the card is oc'ed past what it is stable @ 60hz. I know what you are saying but it's not correct in this case.

I'm on water and my core hits 50c max. it isn't normal gpu artifacting I know what that looks like. It is full display corruption.

The way to explain it is most of us with this problem can do 1200mhz @ 60hz or 1100 mhz @ 120hz.

but not 1200mhz @ 120hz. Which doesn't completely make sense since the max monitor oc should have nothing to do with the max gpu oc

It seems to be a problem with the qnix since I think people can do 1200mhz @ 120hz on different monitors besides the qnix
Edited by HardwareDecoder - 12/28/13 at 9:27am
Gaming Machine
(19 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770k Asus z77 P8Z77-LK V Sapphire 290x Sapphire 290x 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Gskill 4x4gb @ 1600mhz Samsung Evo 120gb Samsung Evo 120gb 2TB Seagate Game storage drive  
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
XSPC Raystorm CPU BLOCK EK Nickle/Acetal 290x Block  2x XSPC 240MM Radiator Windows 8.1  
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Qnix Evolution II  Cooler Master Quickfire Rapid  Cooler Master V1000 Fractal Arc Midi R2 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G400 steel series qck Logitech G430 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming Machine
(19 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770k Asus z77 P8Z77-LK V Sapphire 290x Sapphire 290x 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Gskill 4x4gb @ 1600mhz Samsung Evo 120gb Samsung Evo 120gb 2TB Seagate Game storage drive  
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
XSPC Raystorm CPU BLOCK EK Nickle/Acetal 290x Block  2x XSPC 240MM Radiator Windows 8.1  
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Qnix Evolution II  Cooler Master Quickfire Rapid  Cooler Master V1000 Fractal Arc Midi R2 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G400 steel series qck Logitech G430 
  hide details  
Reply
post #11789 of 25911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoot178 View Post

Greetings everyone.

Just got my QNIX and I LOVE it. Bright and beautiful. **** stand, but the stand isn't why we buy them.

I am wondering how 3 of these in surround mode on two EVGA GTX 780ti SC would fare. Anyone have any benchmarks on this? I bought this monitor along with those 2 cards and I kinda wanna try the three way surround.

The GTX780ti is the fastest GPU period right now but the problem isn't speed it is VRAM. With one 1440p monitor it is recommended to have 2GB+ of VRAM, having three you will need 6GB+ to support the pixel space and not get bottlenecked. Now that doesn't mean it won't work and work well in some situations, it just means certain games with huge texture sizes will get bottlenecked. One good example is Skyrim, i have a GTX780ti and when playing skyrim on my Qnix i have seen the VRAM get to about 2.4GB. Now that is with one screen so if you triple that you are going to be getting cut short with on;ly having 3GB total usable VRAM.

Now for testing purposes i have setup my crossover, Qnix and Dell(1440p) in surround to benchmark(and borrowed a second and third GTX780ti). Needless to say using one card got destroyed in many modern games, however older games like shadowrun, Dead space 1, tomb raider anv. all were within playable FPS(around and just over 30-45) with some mainly texture or VRAM intensive settings off(AA, object detail, texture detail).

With two cards many games like BF4, Skyrim, and crysis did get a good deal better in FPS but there was a catch. At all points in the game there was always parts were i would get a BIG drop in FPS, like turning a corner and getting view of a very large area with a lot of textures visible. I know this happens to a certain extent anyway but this was different and the change was excessive. Like in Skyrim when in a cave i could get as high as 80FPS but when leaving the cave and going into open space(or "skyrim") i would drop to 20-30FPS. Battlefields results and crysis(3) were very similar. Older games ran perfectly fine on two cards, i think the somewhat raided setup of the VRAM gave it just enough to handle older textures fast enough.

With three cards the FPS increased in older games again but it was a lot less predominant. Only gaining about 25-30% in overall frames. There was also several spots that the frame were less than with 2 cards. Newer games were even worse. The increase was apparent in certain parts of the games that were very confined(skyrim cave) but any open view areas were just about the same as having two cards. Areas that i dropped to 25FPS with two cards dropped to 28-30FPS with 3.

Now one thing that made a big difference in these bottleneck points was dropping any setting that was heavily reliant on VRAM. Like in Skyrim turning texture size all the way down and turning view distance all the way down made a huge difference being outdoors. Battlefield didn't get much better in most areas but there was a difference(i think BF4 is just buggy anyway). The most convincing evidence that this is a VRAM bottleneck is that these settings changes only effected the lowest FPS and not so much the average.

So bottom line triple monitoring these with two GTX780ti's would be potentially viable if your expecting to turn a few settings down(related to VRAM use) and get no better than 60FPS(which would make overclocking a little mute). Really in this situation it may be more viable for a Titan or if a 6GB variant of the GTX780ti(higher than 6GB would be best but options are limited). VRAM overclocks also seemed to help more than what i would usually expect(10FPS from a mere 100mhz). Lastly if you do run portrait surround with 1440p monitors i highly recommend debezeling due to the thick bezel size.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HardwareDecoder View Post

it's not because of heat, or being oc'ed too high, well it is because of being oc'ed too high but not because the card is oc'ed past what it is stable @ 60hz. I know what you are saying but it's not correct in this case.

I'm on water and my core hits 50c max. it isn't normal gpu artifacting I know what that looks like. It is full display corruption.

The way to explain it is most of us with this problem can do 1200mhz @ 60hz or 1100 mhz @ 120hz.

but not 1200mhz @ 120hz. Which doesn't completely make sense since the max monitor oc should have nothing to do with the max gpu oc

It seems to be a problem with the qnix since I think people can do 1200mhz @ 120hz on different monitors besides the qnix

This may be unrelated but i run my GTX780ti at 1241mhz and run my Qnix at 144hz while gaming in first person shooters(120hz in everything else). So if the issue was with the Qnix shouldn't it be constant between cards? Or could this be an issue with the Qnix combined with AMD cards. I also ran the Qnix at at least 120hz with a GTX 460, 570(SLI), 760, 770(SLI), 780ti. I did notice a higher potential refresh overclock with single card solutions and noticed there was a slight trade off in overclock between the monitor and VRAM(meaning with certain VRAM overclocks would limit monitor overclocks but nothing related to the GPU clocks).
Edited by Spartan F8 - 12/28/13 at 9:53am
post #11790 of 25911
This may be a very stupid question, but is it possible to run these monitors in 1080 and still have the picture fill the screen even though they don't have a scaler? I may just be misunderstanding what a scaler does.
The War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5 MSI 980 ti 6G 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Intel SSD 480GB Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 64 bit 39" 1920x1080 
PowerCase
EVGA SuperNOVA G2 650 Fractal Design Define R5 
  hide details  
Reply
The War Machine
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4790k Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5 MSI 980 ti 6G 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Intel SSD 480GB Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 64 bit 39" 1920x1080 
PowerCase
EVGA SuperNOVA G2 650 Fractal Design Define R5 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Monitors and Displays
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › [Official] The Qnix/X-Star 1440p Monitor Club