Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › 1 PCIe SSD or 2 SSD in RAID 0
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1 PCIe SSD or 2 SSD in RAID 0

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
I was wondering if what's the benefit of a PCIe-based SSD like the OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 480GB over 2 Samsung 840 PRO 256GB in RAID 0. Will the boot up time be faster than the 2 SATA-based SSD? Will loading times in games be faster? Thank you.
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 10
Well, if you don't care about price.. go for the RevoDrive.

The RevoDrive has twice the amount of IOPS and upto three times the throughput.
And it also doesn't need to communicate with a SATA controller, which lowers latency.

Using RAID'ed SSDs will significantly increase the boot-time since the RAID-Software requires a few seconds to start when booting the computer.
The throughput will reach around 900-1000MB/s, but I don't think the IOPS will receive any kind of boost.

Loading times in games should improve dramaticly in both situations, IF you have fast enough RAM.
(DDR3 1600MHz should be plenty.)
Edited by Bloodcore - 5/4/13 at 8:06am
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k 4.5Ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme4 GEN3 Vapor-X HD7970 GHz Ripjaws 8GB 2200Mhz CL9 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair ForceGT 120GB, C300 256GB + 64GB, 1TB ext External Windows 8.1 x64 Pro Dell P2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Illuminated Keyboard Seasonic X-760 LianLi PC-9F Rev.USB3 Logitech G500 
Mouse PadAudioOther
XXL Steelseries Asus Xonar Essence ST Intel i350-T2 Server Adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k 4.5Ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme4 GEN3 Vapor-X HD7970 GHz Ripjaws 8GB 2200Mhz CL9 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair ForceGT 120GB, C300 256GB + 64GB, 1TB ext External Windows 8.1 x64 Pro Dell P2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Illuminated Keyboard Seasonic X-760 LianLi PC-9F Rev.USB3 Logitech G500 
Mouse PadAudioOther
XXL Steelseries Asus Xonar Essence ST Intel i350-T2 Server Adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 10
PCI_E SSD solutions are way faster than any modern SSD via SATA 3. It goes beyond the bottleneck of SATA 2/3 and produces through puts well in excess of 1.5Gb/s read/write. It's essentially like having 4x ssd's in raid-0 in a single solution without the limitation of SATA 3 or having to buy an expensive dedicated controller.

Although these days 2 modern SSD's in raid-o on sata 3 is more than enough for anyone really. If you crave the absolute fastest SSD performance around then an OCZ Revodrive X2 would suffice. Bere in mind they are not cheap when you want capacity as well as speed.
Expensive Heater
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) MSI 3GB 7970 Lightning [Boosted Edition] 4x GTX680's in 4-Way SLI *SOLD* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H100 Win7 Professional 64Bit Lots Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables 
Case
Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i7 720QM @ 2.80GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 4GB 640GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitor
BluRay Reader Win7 Home Premium 64Bit 18.4" 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Quad core, 2300 MHz, Krait 400 Adreno 330 3GB RAM 32GB storage 
OSMonitorPower
Android OS v4.4.2 (KitKat) 5.7" Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 1920x... 3200 mAh 
  hide details  
Reply
Expensive Heater
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7-3930K (C2) @ (4.6Ghz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme X79 (Bios 3204) MSI 3GB 7970 Lightning [Boosted Edition] 4x GTX680's in 4-Way SLI *SOLD* 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
32GB (4x8GB) G-Skill TridentX 2400Mhz 2x 256GB OCZ Vertex 4's (RAID-0) 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 64MB Cache Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H100 Win7 Professional 64Bit Lots Corsair AX1200 + Corsair RED sleeved cables 
Case
Coolermaster Cosmos II Ultra 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i7 720QM @ 2.80GHz ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 4GB 640GB 
Optical DriveOSMonitor
BluRay Reader Win7 Home Premium 64Bit 18.4" 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Quad core, 2300 MHz, Krait 400 Adreno 330 3GB RAM 32GB storage 
OSMonitorPower
Android OS v4.4.2 (KitKat) 5.7" Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 1920x... 3200 mAh 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaidome View Post

I was wondering if what's the benefit of a PCIe-based SSD like the OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 480GB over 2 Samsung 840 PRO 256GB in RAID 0. Will the boot up time be faster than the 2 SATA-based SSD?
no, actually longer
Quote:
Will loading times in games be faster? Thank you.
similar, however should be faster... slightly
ROG Bench
(15 items)
 
Terrorbyte V2
(17 items)
 
Le Papa's
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k Asus Maximus VI Extreme  MSI GTX 660 Ti PE OC 32GB G.Skill Ares 1866MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro Samsung 840 EVO  Samsung 830 Crucial MX100 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 WD Blue WD10EZEX Toshiba DT01ACA300 Thermalright Silver Arrow 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit bequiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W Corsair 650D 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Intel Xeon L5520 Intel Xeon L5520 Dell  ASPEED 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Nanya 72GB 1066MHz ECC Registered Kingston V300 SanDisk Extreme II WD Red 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samung Spinpoint F4 Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 Samsung Spinpoint F3  Seagate 7200.12 
OSPowerCaseOther
Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Dell C1100 PSU and Corsair 650TX  Dell C1100 Chassis and Norco RPC 4224 LSI 9261-8i 
Other
Intel RES2CV240 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
A8 5600K BIOSTAR Hi-Fi A85W G.Skill Ripjaws X  Crucial M4 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMonitor
Asus DVD Burner Microsoft Windows 7 Professional  ASUS VE276Q HPw1907 
PowerCase
Antec Neo Eco 520 HAF 912 
  hide details  
Reply
ROG Bench
(15 items)
 
Terrorbyte V2
(17 items)
 
Le Papa's
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k Asus Maximus VI Extreme  MSI GTX 660 Ti PE OC 32GB G.Skill Ares 1866MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro Samsung 840 EVO  Samsung 830 Crucial MX100 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 WD Blue WD10EZEX Toshiba DT01ACA300 Thermalright Silver Arrow 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit bequiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W Corsair 650D 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Intel Xeon L5520 Intel Xeon L5520 Dell  ASPEED 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Nanya 72GB 1066MHz ECC Registered Kingston V300 SanDisk Extreme II WD Red 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samung Spinpoint F4 Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 Samsung Spinpoint F3  Seagate 7200.12 
OSPowerCaseOther
Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Dell C1100 PSU and Corsair 650TX  Dell C1100 Chassis and Norco RPC 4224 LSI 9261-8i 
Other
Intel RES2CV240 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
A8 5600K BIOSTAR Hi-Fi A85W G.Skill Ripjaws X  Crucial M4 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMonitor
Asus DVD Burner Microsoft Windows 7 Professional  ASUS VE276Q HPw1907 
PowerCase
Antec Neo Eco 520 HAF 912 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Webster View Post

no, actually longer
PCIe-SSD's actually require longer boot-times?
Odd, always thought they would shave off another second or two since the SATA-controller would be out of the equation.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k 4.5Ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme4 GEN3 Vapor-X HD7970 GHz Ripjaws 8GB 2200Mhz CL9 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair ForceGT 120GB, C300 256GB + 64GB, 1TB ext External Windows 8.1 x64 Pro Dell P2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Illuminated Keyboard Seasonic X-760 LianLi PC-9F Rev.USB3 Logitech G500 
Mouse PadAudioOther
XXL Steelseries Asus Xonar Essence ST Intel i350-T2 Server Adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k 4.5Ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme4 GEN3 Vapor-X HD7970 GHz Ripjaws 8GB 2200Mhz CL9 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair ForceGT 120GB, C300 256GB + 64GB, 1TB ext External Windows 8.1 x64 Pro Dell P2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Illuminated Keyboard Seasonic X-760 LianLi PC-9F Rev.USB3 Logitech G500 
Mouse PadAudioOther
XXL Steelseries Asus Xonar Essence ST Intel i350-T2 Server Adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 10
Revodrive is one bad,lousy,unreliable,incompatible raid field with asynchronous NAND that is way too slow for the price it has.
OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 480 GB $696.63

Samsung 840 Pro 2 x 256GB Amazon.com $502.40



Revodrive have its own bios that have very long boot time.
post #7 of 10
I agree with Igor, the Revo drives are an on board RAID setup, which most likely does not support TRIM.

The main problem when using them is, not all mother boards allow you to boot from a PCIe device. My old socket 775 Intel made board let me boot from a PCIe card, but none of my ASUS boards or ASRock boards could boot from those devices. You must determine if your board allows booting from a PCIe device before considering a drive like that, because it is not a given.

Finally, next year the SATA Express standard is being released, a SATA standard over a PCIe connection. There will be a new generation of SSDs using this interface, and the current Revo drives are not compatible, and will be history.
post #8 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unit Igor View Post

Revodrive is one bad,lousy,unreliable,incompatible raid field with asynchronous NAND that is way too slow for the price it has.
OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 480 GB $696.63

Samsung 840 Pro 2 x 256GB Amazon.com $502.40



Revodrive have its own bios that have very long boot time.

I remember some guy from NewEgg saying that the reason they only get that kind of speeds is because the link of the PCIe slot the SSD is in is in only x1 and not x4. Is this true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhill2029 View Post

PCI_E SSD solutions are way faster than any modern SSD via SATA 3. It goes beyond the bottleneck of SATA 2/3 and produces through puts well in excess of 1.5Gb/s read/write. It's essentially like having 4x ssd's in raid-0 in a single solution without the limitation of SATA 3 or having to buy an expensive dedicated controller.

Although these days 2 modern SSD's in raid-o on sata 3 is more than enough for anyone really. If you crave the absolute fastest SSD performance around then an OCZ Revodrive X2 would suffice. Bere in mind they are not cheap when you want capacity as well as speed.

Got it. So 2 840 Pros will be enough for me then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Webster View Post

no, actually longer
similar, however should be faster... slightly

So the load time for games will only be slightly faster? If so, am I good to go with 2 840 Pros?
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by parsec View Post

I agree with Igor, the Revo drives are an on board RAID setup, which most likely does not support TRIM.
it does
Quote:
Finally, next year the SATA Express standard is being released, a SATA standard over a PCIe connection. There will be a new generation of SSDs using this interface, and the current Revo drives are not compatible, and will be history.
I cant wait for it! biggrin.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaidome View Post

I remember some guy from NewEgg saying that the reason they only get that kind of speeds is because the link of the PCIe slot the SSD is in is in only x1 and not x4. Is this true?
No, the speeds igor posted are from PCIe 2.0 x4. PCIe 2.0 x1 would only allow around 400MB/s, not the 700.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Webster View Post

no, actually longer
similar, however should be faster... slightly

So the load time for games will only be slightly faster? If so, am I good to go with 2 840 Pros?[/quote]Pros in RAID 0 is what I'd do if I wanted to waste some cash. biggrin.gif

However, have you used an SSD before...SSD -> HDD is night and day already, running a RAID 0 array of SSDs is only marginally faster.
ROG Bench
(15 items)
 
Terrorbyte V2
(17 items)
 
Le Papa's
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k Asus Maximus VI Extreme  MSI GTX 660 Ti PE OC 32GB G.Skill Ares 1866MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro Samsung 840 EVO  Samsung 830 Crucial MX100 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 WD Blue WD10EZEX Toshiba DT01ACA300 Thermalright Silver Arrow 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit bequiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W Corsair 650D 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Intel Xeon L5520 Intel Xeon L5520 Dell  ASPEED 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Nanya 72GB 1066MHz ECC Registered Kingston V300 SanDisk Extreme II WD Red 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samung Spinpoint F4 Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 Samsung Spinpoint F3  Seagate 7200.12 
OSPowerCaseOther
Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Dell C1100 PSU and Corsair 650TX  Dell C1100 Chassis and Norco RPC 4224 LSI 9261-8i 
Other
Intel RES2CV240 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
A8 5600K BIOSTAR Hi-Fi A85W G.Skill Ripjaws X  Crucial M4 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMonitor
Asus DVD Burner Microsoft Windows 7 Professional  ASUS VE276Q HPw1907 
PowerCase
Antec Neo Eco 520 HAF 912 
  hide details  
Reply
ROG Bench
(15 items)
 
Terrorbyte V2
(17 items)
 
Le Papa's
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k Asus Maximus VI Extreme  MSI GTX 660 Ti PE OC 32GB G.Skill Ares 1866MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro Samsung 840 EVO  Samsung 830 Crucial MX100 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 WD Blue WD10EZEX Toshiba DT01ACA300 Thermalright Silver Arrow 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit bequiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W Corsair 650D 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Intel Xeon L5520 Intel Xeon L5520 Dell  ASPEED 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Nanya 72GB 1066MHz ECC Registered Kingston V300 SanDisk Extreme II WD Red 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samung Spinpoint F4 Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 Samsung Spinpoint F3  Seagate 7200.12 
OSPowerCaseOther
Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Dell C1100 PSU and Corsair 650TX  Dell C1100 Chassis and Norco RPC 4224 LSI 9261-8i 
Other
Intel RES2CV240 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
A8 5600K BIOSTAR Hi-Fi A85W G.Skill Ripjaws X  Crucial M4 
Optical DriveOSMonitorMonitor
Asus DVD Burner Microsoft Windows 7 Professional  ASUS VE276Q HPw1907 
PowerCase
Antec Neo Eco 520 HAF 912 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Webster View Post

it does
I cant wait for it! biggrin.gif
No, the speeds igor posted are from PCIe 2.0 x4. PCIe 2.0 x1 would only allow around 400MB/s, not the 700.
So the load time for games will only be slightly faster? If so, am I good to go with 2 840 Pros?
Pros in RAID 0 is what I'd do if I wanted to waste some cash. biggrin.gif

However, have you used an SSD before...SSD -> HDD is night and day already, running a RAID 0 array of SSDs is only marginally faster.[/quote]

Oh. Going for 2 840 Pros then. Thanks all! biggrin.gif
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
Dell Laptop
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Pentium T2390 0U990C Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family DDR2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOptical DriveCooling
ST9320325AS ATA Device MVQLWZG MR0L27SD2N0 SCSI Cdrom Device TSSTCorp DVD+-RW TS-L632H ATA Device Heatsink 
OSMonitorKeyboard
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Integrated 15.6" Integrated 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: SSD
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › 1 PCIe SSD or 2 SSD in RAID 0