Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [xbitlabs] Unknown AMD SoC Features 8 Bulldozer Modules, 1024 Stream Processors, 512-Bit Memory Bus.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[xbitlabs] Unknown AMD SoC Features 8 Bulldozer Modules, 1024 Stream Processors, 512-Bit Memory Bus. - Page 7

post #61 of 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010rig View Post

Why are AMD users so touchy? You guys really need to get your insecurities in check.

I posted it because that was what I upgraded from, and clearly I have no problem buying from either AMD or Intel, that was really the point I was driving across, but you guys look way too much into things.

AMD users are touchy because they're constantly prodded. If your preferences were attacked every time you said anything positive about one of them, you'd get kind of sore too.
post #62 of 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyadCK View Post

.... You don't have an 8300 chip, so I guess it's kind of acceptable that you don't understand this, but...

FACEPALM

Do you have any idea the voltage requirements to even hit 5Ghz? It's upwards of 1.525, as high as 1.575 at times. You need an H100 at bare minimum (that's with push/pull) to hold 5, and that likely won't get you into the safe zone temp wise if you actually use the entire chip, like video encoding.

Even if they mean an NH-D14, "Easy" 5Ghz on air, truly stable, is a huge deal, and world record setters (See: Likely target audience) might look seriously at these.

On topic:

That would make an epic HSA-capable server chip.

I can get my 8320 to 5.2Ghz on 1.4v with a CM 412s. smile.gif
Quote:
Why are AMD users so touchy? You guys really need to get your insecurities in check.

I posted it because that was what I upgraded from, and clearly I have no problem buying from either AMD or Intel, that was really the point I was driving across, but you guys look way too much into things.

Could've fooled me wink.gif. To me you were saying "My pentuim II 233 is soo much slower then my FX-8350 on liquid helium at 1337e+9001GHZ (not really but you get the point).
Icky Thump
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8320 Asus M5A97 EVO R.2 Asus 5850 Kingston T1 2x4 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
Kingston HyperX 2x2 WD Caviar Black  Corsair H80i Ubuntu 13.04 
KeyboardPowerMouseAudio
Ducky G2 Pro Seasonic S2SII 620W Logitech G400 Asus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
Icky Thump
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8320 Asus M5A97 EVO R.2 Asus 5850 Kingston T1 2x4 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
Kingston HyperX 2x2 WD Caviar Black  Corsair H80i Ubuntu 13.04 
KeyboardPowerMouseAudio
Ducky G2 Pro Seasonic S2SII 620W Logitech G400 Asus Xonar DG 
  hide details  
Reply
post #63 of 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Hondo View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by KyadCK View Post

.... You don't have an 8300 chip, so I guess it's kind of acceptable that you don't understand this, but...

FACEPALM

Do you have any idea the voltage requirements to even hit 5Ghz? It's upwards of 1.525, as high as 1.575 at times. You need an H100 at bare minimum (that's with push/pull) to hold 5, and that likely won't get you into the safe zone temp wise if you actually use the entire chip, like video encoding.

Even if they mean an NH-D14, "Easy" 5Ghz on air, truly stable, is a huge deal, and world record setters (See: Likely target audience) might look seriously at these.

On topic:

That would make an epic HSA-capable server chip.

I can get my 8320 to 5.2Ghz on 1.4v with a CM 412s. smile.gif
Quote:
Why are AMD users so touchy? You guys really need to get your insecurities in check.

I posted it because that was what I upgraded from, and clearly I have no problem buying from either AMD or Intel, that was really the point I was driving across, but you guys look way too much into things.

Could've fooled me wink.gif. To me you were saying "My pentuim II 233 is soo much slower then my FX-8350 on liquid helium at 1337e+9001GHZ (not really but you get the point).

Do more than CPU-z with it.
Forge
(16 items)
 
Forge-LT
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4720HQ UX501JW-UB71T GTX 960m 16GB 1600 9-9-9-27 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
512GB PCI-e SSD Windows 10 Pro 4k IPS 
  hide details  
Reply
Forge
(16 items)
 
Forge-LT
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4720HQ UX501JW-UB71T GTX 960m 16GB 1600 9-9-9-27 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
512GB PCI-e SSD Windows 10 Pro 4k IPS 
  hide details  
Reply
post #64 of 67
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2734781 and this is on an h80 , i can't wait to get my hands on steamroller. i don't run at this speed for daily stuff, i usually run at 4.6 for everything 24/7, sometimes when i feel the need for speed i run at 5 ghz , my fx-8350 rocks ,
post #65 of 67
Comes 5ghz stock. overclockable higher.
post #66 of 67
4.7ghz stock, Turbos to 5.0ghz , probably won't overclock very much further without real good watercooling. See THREAD
post #67 of 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by N2K12 View Post

Comes 5ghz stock. overclockable higher.
Why exactly did you revive this? tongue.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [xbitlabs] Unknown AMD SoC Features 8 Bulldozer Modules, 1024 Stream Processors, 512-Bit Memory Bus.