I'm gonna be honest here. I keep googling about it and I keep returning to the same page: "The Truthful Mouse Guide" in this forum. In all honesty and trying my hardest to not be biased, I find it quite low quality.
The main proof is citations from a 2006 review, that was done with a process I'm not convinced is viable. In any case it doesn't seem to be much peer reviewed.
The thread guide keeps using aphorisms of the type "do not get wireless" without proving why. Where is the evidence it matters in the real world for real human responses?
In general there is very little reviewing of actual mice. Have you tried the newer sensors, new circuits and models after 2006? Have you tried them repeatedly and read about it from different reviewers?
Did you try newer receivers that claim to have higher polling rates? Have you done tests on non-cloth-mats?
I'll say it for the last time and I'm gone: More tools, methods, reviewing and peer-reviewing is needed.
Otherwise some claims are simply not convincing.