Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Coolaler] 4.6Ghz 4770K Vs 5Ghz 3970X with GTX 680's in Quad SLI
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Coolaler] 4.6Ghz 4770K Vs 5Ghz 3970X with GTX 680's in Quad SLI - Page 5

post #41 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattNo5ss View Post

It pretty much boils down to this:

4770K > 3970X in situations when the application utilizes 4c/8t or less (everyday tasks and moderately multi-threaded).
4770K < 3970X in situations when the application utilizes 5c/10t or 6c/12t (highly multi-threaded).
4770K ~= 3970K in situations when the application cares most about GPU power (games and GPU-dependent 3D benchmarks).

 

are you including a price your "<" and ">" decisions?  If not, the 3970x wins in everything. 

Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #42 of 114
No price, just performance. If I included price, then the 4770K would win in everything since it will probably be ~$700 cheaper biggrin.gif
Daily Driver
(13 items)
 
FreeNAS
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4770K ASRock Z87M OC Formula EVGA GTX 780 SC Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 4 Windows 7 Pro x64 Acer XB270HU 27" IPS WQHD 144Hz G-Sync KBT 75% RACE 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
SeaSonic X750 Silverstone TJ08-E Logitech G9x ASUS Xonar Essence STX 
Other
AudioTechnica ATH-M50X 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Intel Pentium G3258 ASUS Z87I-Deluxe 2x8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 16GB Corsair Voyager Vega USB3.0 FLash Drive 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
5x2TB HGST 7200RPM 32MB Cache Thermalright AXP-100 FreeNAS Corsair CX430 
Case
BitFenix Phenom 
  hide details  
Reply
Daily Driver
(13 items)
 
FreeNAS
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4770K ASRock Z87M OC Formula EVGA GTX 780 SC Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
OCZ Vertex 4 Windows 7 Pro x64 Acer XB270HU 27" IPS WQHD 144Hz G-Sync KBT 75% RACE 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
SeaSonic X750 Silverstone TJ08-E Logitech G9x ASUS Xonar Essence STX 
Other
AudioTechnica ATH-M50X 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Intel Pentium G3258 ASUS Z87I-Deluxe 2x8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 16GB Corsair Voyager Vega USB3.0 FLash Drive 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
5x2TB HGST 7200RPM 32MB Cache Thermalright AXP-100 FreeNAS Corsair CX430 
Case
BitFenix Phenom 
  hide details  
Reply
post #43 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattNo5ss View Post

No price, just performance. If I included price, then the 4770K would win in everything since it will probably be ~$700 cheaper biggrin.gif

It'll probably only be 100-150 cheaper than a 3930K though.
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
post #44 of 114
Graphic performance in gaming across is really just a niche differences.

Talks about computing rendering and process video. X79 wins.
 
≡ Snowbaru ≡
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 3930K 4.9Ghz Asus Sabertooth X79 EVGA GTX TITAN 1250Mhz KPE/Hybrid BIOS (SOLD) NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Founder Edition 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
32GB Samsung 30nm 2400Mhz OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 850 EVO 13000GB HDDs 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Custom Watercooling, XSPC, Bitpower, Primo... Windows 10 Pro x64 (1607) ASUS PG278Q G-SYNC (2560x1440) Logitech G910 Onion Spark 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA SuperNOVA 850G2 Gold Fractal Design Define S Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
AudioOtherOtherOther
Logitech G933 Xbox One Controller Asus RT-AC68U Hitron CDA3 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
Other
5HP 
  hide details  
Reply
 
≡ Snowbaru ≡
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 3930K 4.9Ghz Asus Sabertooth X79 EVGA GTX TITAN 1250Mhz KPE/Hybrid BIOS (SOLD) NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Founder Edition 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
32GB Samsung 30nm 2400Mhz OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 850 EVO 13000GB HDDs 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Custom Watercooling, XSPC, Bitpower, Primo... Windows 10 Pro x64 (1607) ASUS PG278Q G-SYNC (2560x1440) Logitech G910 Onion Spark 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA SuperNOVA 850G2 Gold Fractal Design Define S Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
AudioOtherOtherOther
Logitech G933 Xbox One Controller Asus RT-AC68U Hitron CDA3 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
Other
5HP 
  hide details  
Reply
post #45 of 114
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin SSJ Eric View Post

Lol, I don't see how a 12k CPU score is only a "small amount" less than a 15k CPU score? My 3960X get nearly 16k CPU score at 5GHz and the 4770k will be no where near that. I'm guessing it'll still be a full 3 points or so behind in Cinebench as well...

Why is everyone so focused on the CPU score? It's irrelevant in 11. It's all about the total score and people are losing sight of that. In this benchmark the 4770K is within 1 percent. In others it will get destroyed but that's not what this thread is about.
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
post #46 of 114
Honestly even though I have nothing against the people buying the extreme editions, they're still completely pointless over the cheaper 3930K and the upcoming IB-E version




...

It's just the silicon lottery as usual. Might as well buy the cheaper ticket with an equal chance of winning.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #47 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Why is everyone so focused on the CPU score? It's irrelevant in 11. It's all about the total score and people are losing sight of that. In this benchmark the 4770K is within 1 percent. In others it will get destroyed but that's not what this thread is about.

Because X79 is being bottledowned by the graphic score.
 
≡ Snowbaru ≡
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 3930K 4.9Ghz Asus Sabertooth X79 EVGA GTX TITAN 1250Mhz KPE/Hybrid BIOS (SOLD) NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Founder Edition 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
32GB Samsung 30nm 2400Mhz OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 850 EVO 13000GB HDDs 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Custom Watercooling, XSPC, Bitpower, Primo... Windows 10 Pro x64 (1607) ASUS PG278Q G-SYNC (2560x1440) Logitech G910 Onion Spark 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA SuperNOVA 850G2 Gold Fractal Design Define S Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
AudioOtherOtherOther
Logitech G933 Xbox One Controller Asus RT-AC68U Hitron CDA3 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
Other
5HP 
  hide details  
Reply
 
≡ Snowbaru ≡
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 3930K 4.9Ghz Asus Sabertooth X79 EVGA GTX TITAN 1250Mhz KPE/Hybrid BIOS (SOLD) NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Founder Edition 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
32GB Samsung 30nm 2400Mhz OCZ Vertex 4 Samsung 850 EVO 13000GB HDDs 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Custom Watercooling, XSPC, Bitpower, Primo... Windows 10 Pro x64 (1607) ASUS PG278Q G-SYNC (2560x1440) Logitech G910 Onion Spark 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
EVGA SuperNOVA 850G2 Gold Fractal Design Define S Logitech G502 Logitech G440 
AudioOtherOtherOther
Logitech G933 Xbox One Controller Asus RT-AC68U Hitron CDA3 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
5HP 5HP 5HP 5HP 
Other
5HP 
  hide details  
Reply
post #48 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin SSJ Eric View Post

Lol, I don't see how a 12k CPU score is only a "small amount" less than a 15k CPU score? My 3960X get nearly 16k CPU score at 5GHz and the 4770k will be no where near that. I'm guessing it'll still be a full 3 points or so behind in Cinebench as well...

Why is everyone so focused on the CPU score? It's irrelevant in 11. It's all about the total score and people are losing sight of that. In this benchmark the 4770K is within 1 percent. In others it will get destroyed but that's not what this thread is about.


CPU score in this situation is probably the only thing that matters because it is less variable to differences in system and the benchers environment.
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
post #49 of 114
4770K doing work for a 1/3 of the price biggrin.gif
post #50 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

Why is everyone so focused on the CPU score? It's irrelevant in 11. It's all about the total score and people are losing sight of that. In this benchmark the 4770K is within 1 percent. In others it will get destroyed but that's not what this thread is about.

Are you serious??? Your OP said "6 Core SBE's about to be dethroned" so naturally everybody is looking at the CPU score which is the one score that directly compares a 6 core SBE with a 4770k. Why would we look at the total score which factors in GPU's, PCIE lanes,IMC's, and loads of other stuff that have little or nothing to do with the CPU's? rolleyes.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Coolaler] 4.6Ghz 4770K Vs 5Ghz 3970X with GTX 680's in Quad SLI