Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [diy.pconline.com.cn] Intel Core i5 4670k first test
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[diy.pconline.com.cn] Intel Core i5 4670k first test - Page 4

post #31 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKHunt View Post

I wanna run quad IGP.

This. Intel needs to run a pair of HD 6000 IGP's in SLI or Xfire or whatever the heck intel would use on die.
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
post #32 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

This. Intel needs to run a pair of HD 6000 IGP's in SLI or Xfire or whatever the heck intel would use on die.

Last time I checked, SLIing GT 640s or CFing 7750s usually results in much more micro-stuttering than dual 670s or 7950s. I'd imagine Intel's multiple IGP setup would fare much worse, given the fact they have much less performance than the 640 or 7750, must share the system RAM, and have less mature drivers than Nividia or AMD.

It took several years for Nividia and AMD to resolve the micro-stuttering, and still haven't came close to stomping it out. Intel has absolutely no experience with multiple GPU setups, and would have to start from scratch.
post #33 of 202
How likely is it that it turns out to be a decent upgrade? And the leaks are just wrong?

I'd be a fool to get a 2600k before the reviews are out
rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2700k @ 4.5GHz ASRock z75 Pro3 MSI 980 Ti Gaming and Gigabyte R9 290 OC windforce 8GB 2133 CL9 Gskill Snipper 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
2x 128GB M4 sata3 3TB Seagate + 640GB WD black M550 512GB sata3 2x140mm SilverArrow 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 64bit QNIX 27" 1440p @96Hz 850W EVGA SuperNova +80Gold HAF 932 
MouseAudioAudio
Razor Abyssus SoundBlaster Z  Logitech X-540 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2700k @ 4.5GHz ASRock z75 Pro3 MSI 980 Ti Gaming and Gigabyte R9 290 OC windforce 8GB 2133 CL9 Gskill Snipper 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
2x 128GB M4 sata3 3TB Seagate + 640GB WD black M550 512GB sata3 2x140mm SilverArrow 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win7 64bit QNIX 27" 1440p @96Hz 850W EVGA SuperNova +80Gold HAF 932 
MouseAudioAudio
Razor Abyssus SoundBlaster Z  Logitech X-540 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #34 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaltenbrunner View Post

How likely is it that it turns out to be a decent upgrade? And the leaks are just wrong?

I'd be a fool to get a 2600k before the reviews are out

2 reviews of retail silicone doesnt lie
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
post #35 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post

2 reviews of retail silicone doesnt lie

Except one failed at 1.2V @ 3.9 and one was running at 1.14V @ 4.5. So which one is lying?
post #36 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forceman View Post

Except one failed at 1.2V @ 3.9 and one was running at 1.14V @ 4.5. So which one is lying?

Maybe they're not lying and just suck as overclockers wink.gif
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
post #37 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forceman View Post

Except one failed at 1.2V @ 3.9 and one was running at 1.14V @ 4.5. So which one is lying?

A while ago, friend of mine had to pump in 1.45V into his 2500K or 2600K to get 4 GHz. He even had a custom waterloop, and it wasn't running that hot.
post #38 of 202
Haswell will not flop. The improvements are just not (that we've seen) in our area of interest. I'm more interested in the Q3 benchmarks of Haswell powered laptops and hopefully tablets.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 2600k Asus ROG Maximus V Gene Reference EVGA GTX 680 (1306 / 7204) Reference EVGA GTX 680 SC (1280 / 7160) 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
16GB Samsung 'Green' 1600 DDR3 (MV-3V4G3D/US) Samsung 830 256GB Noctua U12P SE2 w/ AP14s P-P Windows 7 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Hannspree 23" SL231 LED Logitech G710+ Seasonic SS-860XP2 Platinum Cardboard box & motherboard tray 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Dying Razer Death Adder Desktop Schiit Magni + Optical Modi Swan M50W 
AudioAudio
Sennheiser HD 600 Samson Meteor Mic w/ pop filter 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 2600k Asus ROG Maximus V Gene Reference EVGA GTX 680 (1306 / 7204) Reference EVGA GTX 680 SC (1280 / 7160) 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
16GB Samsung 'Green' 1600 DDR3 (MV-3V4G3D/US) Samsung 830 256GB Noctua U12P SE2 w/ AP14s P-P Windows 7 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Hannspree 23" SL231 LED Logitech G710+ Seasonic SS-860XP2 Platinum Cardboard box & motherboard tray 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Dying Razer Death Adder Desktop Schiit Magni + Optical Modi Swan M50W 
AudioAudio
Sennheiser HD 600 Samson Meteor Mic w/ pop filter 
  hide details  
Reply
post #39 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Puft View Post


Maybe they're not lying and just suck as overclockers wink.gif


I know - my point was that it's too early to make a judgement on whether Haswell is a flop or not.  Two pre-release Chinese language psuedo-reviews do not provide enough data.

post #40 of 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forceman View Post


I know - my point was that it's too early to make a judgement on whether Haswell is a flop or not.  Two pre-release Chinese language psuedo-reviews do not provide enough data.

Everyone said ivy was a flop and it provided around the same gains. To me its just a new toy to play with.
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
Core I7 5960X
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core I7 5960X ASRock X99 OC Formula MSI GTX 970 Gaming MSI GTX 970 Gaming 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
G. Skill 16GB DDR4 2600 Sandisk Extreme II 240GB SSD Custom 480 Water Setup Windows 10 
PowerCase
AX1500I Corsair 900D 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [diy.pconline.com.cn] Intel Core i5 4670k first test