Originally Posted by jayfkay
skylit nice to see you are still here. rationally speaking, all your information is nice but what does it mean?is a 9000fps mouse aka the mlt04 that much better than a 6k one? and in which way? more accurate? faster? more responsive? less forgiving?
Higher frame rate could contribute to higher IPS provided data allocation is setup properly. Though, in terms of this specific sensor, it only really aids potential smoothness of cursor path. The same way higher polling rate feels much smoother than a lower value... at least when pegged at full speed.
So no, it's not really better in terms of real world usage.. Well unless you can perceive such change. Not factoring jumps from completely different architectures and or CPI values. Hence why I mentioned not limited to~
If you're asking from a general perpective, then higher frame rate sensors are usually smoother when compared to other designs, but that value isn't static like I mentioned. For all you know, both 6000 and 9000 FPS versions can operate @ a similar framerate on a specific pad. lol
From a technical specification aspect, G400 has a stronger sensor. Larger array contributes to more accurate imaging.
6000 FPS intelli = 2.9mp/s
9000 FPS intelli = 4.4mp/s
6469 FPS G400 = 5.8mp/s.
I don't agree with a combined calculation as you have both Low fps, large array, and larger array lower FPS designs that feel completely different from each other.
Originally Posted by r0ach
It's just like monitor refresh rate, anything over around 85hz gets severe diminishing returns. I doubt anyone knows the point at which this happens for mouse framerate.
Funny enough, I have a similar resolve. But its more like 91-100 hz/fps for me Edited by Skylit - 5/27/13 at 8:27pm