Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [X-Bit Labs] Retail Versions of Intel Core i “Haswell” Are “Hotter and Slower” Than Expected – Report.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[X-Bit Labs] Retail Versions of Intel Core i “Haswell” Are “Hotter and Slower” Than Expected – Report. - Page 15

post #141 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levys View Post

what's the upgrade lachen.gif

seriously!

2600k would have little problem getting to 5GHz

4770k is barely 4.5? rolleyes.gif
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
FX-8320 Gigabyte 990FXA UD3 Powercolor AX6850 Powercolor AX6850 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Vengeance LP CAS7 1600 (2 x 4GB) Samsung 840 Series Lite-On DVD-RW Corsair H80 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
Arctic Twin Turbo ll x2 Corsair AF140 x3 Corsair SP120 x2 Windows 7 Premium 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 32LH40 1080p 120Hz Interpolated 32" LCD Razer Arctosa Seasonic X650 Corsair 300R Windowed 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder 2013 Razer Vespula Klipsch Promedia 2.1 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
FX-8320 Gigabyte 990FXA UD3 Powercolor AX6850 Powercolor AX6850 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Vengeance LP CAS7 1600 (2 x 4GB) Samsung 840 Series Lite-On DVD-RW Corsair H80 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
Arctic Twin Turbo ll x2 Corsair AF140 x3 Corsair SP120 x2 Windows 7 Premium 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 32LH40 1080p 120Hz Interpolated 32" LCD Razer Arctosa Seasonic X650 Corsair 300R Windowed 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder 2013 Razer Vespula Klipsch Promedia 2.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #142 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by anothergeek View Post

seriously!

2600k would have little problem getting to 5GHz

4770k is barely 4.5? rolleyes.gif

especially after Ivy bridge showed the temps heating up....you'd think they would've learned their lesson.

However, just out of curiosity, doesn't a 4.5ghz haswell i7 equal to about a 5ghz 2600k?
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #143 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by anothergeek View Post

seriously!

2600k would have little problem getting to 5GHz

4770k is barely 4.5? rolleyes.gif
Well, with a couple of GTX 480s, my room gets to hot to bring the chip to 5 GHz, unfortunately. It's above 30 degrees in here most of the time during the summer.
post #144 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimaggio1103 View Post

True, but that's the only benchmark that it applys to. Everywhere else it is close to ivy performance and even loses in some. Considering your OC headroom goes way down, totally a side grade at best. Unless of course you built your rig specifically to run cinebench.

I would assume Cinebench results are actually somewhat indicative of rendering performance in real software....right?

But yeah if somebody already has a 5ghz 2600k....then they'd be stupid to jump from such a great chip. If only Intel put more into their thermal pastes. a 4.8-5ghz i7-4770k would be a VERY solid CPU.
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(13 items)
 
Secondary Rig
(15 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k MSI Z77A-GD65 Gigabyte 780 OC Gigabyte 780 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Ripjaw  Samsung F3  Samsung 830  Asus CD-Rom 
CoolingMonitorMonitorPower
Cooler master hyper 212+  Asus  27in 1440p Auria EQ276W 760 Watt Silencer 
Case
Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3770k ASRock Z77 Pro4-M 290 XFX DD R9 280X Gigabyte 
GraphicsGraphicsRAMHard Drive
R9 280X MSI Gaming R9 280X Power Cooler Crucial Ballistix  Samsung 830 series 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Black Asus 24x Windows 7 Asus 24in  
MonitorPowerCase
27in 1440p Auria CM 750 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #145 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

I would assume Cinebench results are actually somewhat indicative of rendering performance in real software....right?

But yeah if somebody already has a 5ghz 2600k....then they'd be stupid to jump from such a great chip. If only Intel put more into their thermal pastes. a 4.8-5ghz i7-4770k would be a VERY solid CPU.

That all depends. How the software was optimized, instructions sets, ect. So no, not really. It's best to take the averages of all benchmarks to see the actual real world performance. In this case it's on par with ivy.

Until the new instruction sets come out, but by then haswell will be long gone.
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
post #146 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by aweir View Post

Should you go with the "newer" Ivy Bridge CPUs instead? I have this Q6600 and I am starting to notice it having to use more and more of the CPU to do simple things like watch HD flash videos and online video. I think it's finally starting to show its age.

I'm looking for benchmarks for Sandy vs. Ivy vs. Haswell using reasonable overclocks that a normal user would obtain.

http://vr-zone.com/articles/haswell-4770k-vs-ivy-bridge-4770k-4-6ghz/32838.html

The results seems to indicate that Haswell is indeed slightly faster than Ivy at the same clock speed of 4.6 Ghz. Now can either one be overclocked higher?
http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/06/06/might-haswell-upgrade-your-cpu-not-for-your-desktop-rig/

Disappointing news.


I don't think it works like that. Probably just need an os reinstall.

2nd Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[Intel] 2500k [4.5ghz] [1.3 volts] [AsRock] P67 Extreme 6 [Sapphire] 6950 Toxic [Unlocked to 6970 spec] Powercolor reference 6950 [Unlocked to 6970 spec] 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
[Samsung] Low voltage memory [@1866 mHz 9-10-9-28] [GSkill] Sniper 1866 9-10-9-28 1.5V [Corsair] 120gb Force GT WD 500GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x Seagate Crapstellation ES 2TB [Raid 1] [Coolermaster] V8 Windows 7 [Gateway] FDH2402 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
[CM Storm] QuickFire TK [XFX] Core Edition PRO850W [In Win] Dragon Rider Logitech G502 w/ stupid LEDs 
  hide details  
Reply
2nd Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[Intel] 2500k [4.5ghz] [1.3 volts] [AsRock] P67 Extreme 6 [Sapphire] 6950 Toxic [Unlocked to 6970 spec] Powercolor reference 6950 [Unlocked to 6970 spec] 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
[Samsung] Low voltage memory [@1866 mHz 9-10-9-28] [GSkill] Sniper 1866 9-10-9-28 1.5V [Corsair] 120gb Force GT WD 500GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x Seagate Crapstellation ES 2TB [Raid 1] [Coolermaster] V8 Windows 7 [Gateway] FDH2402 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
[CM Storm] QuickFire TK [XFX] Core Edition PRO850W [In Win] Dragon Rider Logitech G502 w/ stupid LEDs 
  hide details  
Reply
post #147 of 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacrossewacker View Post

I would assume Cinebench results are actually somewhat indicative of rendering performance in real software....right?

But yeah if somebody already has a 5ghz 2600k....then they'd be stupid to jump from such a great chip. If only Intel put more into their thermal pastes. a 4.8-5ghz i7-4770k would be a VERY solid CPU.

Minus the RAM factor, Cinebench is pretty much a good bench. As long as you have enough RAM to fit your project in it, usually only the CPU(number of cores-threads & speed) matters. At stock. A fast SSD can help, too.

Overclock that RAM and it's a different matter. thumb.gif
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 6700K MAXIMUS VIII HERO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti G. 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
G. Samsung 830 SSD Western Digital Caviar Blue Seagate ST3 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Noctua DH-15 Windows 10 Pro Dell U2311H  Genius 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair RM750X Cooler Master Haf 932 Newskill Renshi Guang PixArt 3360 Newskill Nami 
AudioAudioOther
Philips 100w speakers@Via2021 HD onboard Sennheiser HD598 Blackjack & Hookers 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 6700K MAXIMUS VIII HERO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti G. 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
G. Samsung 830 SSD Western Digital Caviar Blue Seagate ST3 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Noctua DH-15 Windows 10 Pro Dell U2311H  Genius 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair RM750X Cooler Master Haf 932 Newskill Renshi Guang PixArt 3360 Newskill Nami 
AudioAudioOther
Philips 100w speakers@Via2021 HD onboard Sennheiser HD598 Blackjack & Hookers 
  hide details  
Reply
post #148 of 232
I think I will stay with my current rig biggrin.gif
post #149 of 232
you think so... tongue.gif
post #150 of 232
Even if people wanted to upgrade, they'd have to change the motherboard as well (socket 1155 -> 1150). Not worth it at all if you're on a 3570k or better.

Pity, but since AMD can't compete for gaming I guess we'll have to wait for the next generation of CPUs from both manufacturers.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [X-Bit Labs] Retail Versions of Intel Core i “Haswell” Are “Hotter and Slower” Than Expected – Report.