Originally Posted by Yungbenny911
, Okay, this is Avg OC FPS on OCN, not some webby... Look at the average... Just go do some browsing on your own, i don't need to argue with you or prove the obvious, when you have a 7950 that will beat my 770 @ 1200Mhz like that guy up there said, I'll be glad to run any game benches you want me to
. I'm done
Well you have a 7950, throw in your benches and shut me up. That guy said a 7950 @ 1200Mhz will beat a 770 @ 1300Mhz hahaha... And you guys agree?
I wouldn't put much weight into that valley chart when it comes to comparing the GTX700 series to the HD7900 series. When the 780 launched due to all the controversy of it being so close to titan performance many people started using tweaks. Tweaks which netted 3-6 fps without any additional overclocking. I expect the vast majority of the GTX700 series entries in that chart are with tweaked drivers while most of the 7950s are with stock drivers so it's not a fair comparison at all.
Your 770 is probably in the very low 50s range without driver tweaking,
Originally Posted by Snuckie7
So it's unfair that the 7970 has more shaders and bandwidth, but it's perfectly fine to ignore that Kepler cores are stronger per core than GCN cores? lol okay, seems like a fair bit of hypocrisy there.
The 760 honestly can't touch the 7950. Out of the box "stock" comparisons are useless.
Also the fact that due to it's crippled compute performance GK104 overclocks exceptionally well as you can see with alot of GTX770s hitting 1300Mhz stable on air which is very rare with Tahiti and has yet to be seen on GK110.Edited by th3illusiveman - 6/25/13 at 11:30pm