"Crysis 3 looks better with amd on low than nvidia on high!"
This is virtually impossible even if you threw in 10 year old GPUs from any brand."Much sharper images and the colors are more vibrant with contrast."
So the dozens of reputable reviews showing side by side images of image quality and stating they are basically the same are all lying? The only difference is some slight color variance, AMD's colors are slightly more "vibrant" while NVIDIA colors are more "realistic". If you want more color pop, turn your monitor's color up a couple notches but note vibrant is not always accurate and any certified calibrator calibrates for realism."DX11 with nvdia looks like dx9 and cartooney"
This statement is just pure funny because image quality is not going to magically add features DX11 would provide.
Image quality isn't going to all a sudden give you better smoke, shadows, physics, 5x higher resolution textures, etc. You are trolling or genuinely an AMD fanboy that is afraid to admit it and suffering from the placebo affect. Either way, multiple statements you made in your short post are absolutely impossible. You shouldn't even need to tweak RGB on either solution, if your monitor is calibrated.
Originally Posted by onthemour
It looks bland to me. No placebo. I think the fact that C3 is amd evolved may have something to do with it. Skyrim looks the same. Metro LL looks sharper
Post some high quality images then, without touching RGB values in the drivers. You can't come on OCN claiming these absurd things, things people have proven wrong time and time again, without proof.Edited by Murlocke - 7/6/13 at 11:52pm