Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [EETimes] AMD's Kabini Spotted Ahead of Schedule
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[EETimes] AMD's Kabini Spotted Ahead of Schedule - Page 3

post #21 of 23
@ 13" 768p is not that horrible, but I agree that 900p or better should be a must for anything bigger than 10-11".
And it is not about gaming or anything...high or low resolutions are easier to be disturbing when doing simple (for the GPU) tasks, than gaming, so asking yourself if that 768p is there because the GPU is "weak", is silly...even in 2004-5 with intel chipset 9xx graphics we did not have such "questions".
FooBox
(20 items)
 
 
Camera Gear
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon E5-1650 V3 3.5GHz Dell C610 Quadro K4200 4GB 32GB PC-2133 DDR4 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M550 256GB Dell Windows 7 Professional Dell U2412M 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2412M Dell KB-212-B Dell 850W 80+ Gold T5810 
Mouse
Logitech G700 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Canon EOS 6D  EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM  EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM 
GraphicsOptical DriveOptical DriveOptical Drive
EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Manfrotto 190XPROB Tripod Manfrotto 685B NeoTec Monopod Manfrotto 410 Junior Geared Head 
Optical DriveCase
Manfrotto 496 Ball Head Lowepro Mini Trekker AW 
  hide details  
Reply
FooBox
(20 items)
 
 
Camera Gear
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon E5-1650 V3 3.5GHz Dell C610 Quadro K4200 4GB 32GB PC-2133 DDR4 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M550 256GB Dell Windows 7 Professional Dell U2412M 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2412M Dell KB-212-B Dell 850W 80+ Gold T5810 
Mouse
Logitech G700 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Canon EOS 6D  EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM  EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM 
GraphicsOptical DriveOptical DriveOptical Drive
EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Manfrotto 190XPROB Tripod Manfrotto 685B NeoTec Monopod Manfrotto 410 Junior Geared Head 
Optical DriveCase
Manfrotto 496 Ball Head Lowepro Mini Trekker AW 
  hide details  
Reply
post #22 of 23
Just so you guys know...

With a GPU less power than the AMD Radeon 8400G, the Samsung ATIV w/ Intel has a 3200 x 1800 resolution.
AMD FX ~Seronx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-9800P Acer Wasp R7 M440 SK Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N Stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Microsoft Windows 10 Home Build 14393 Viewsonic XG2401 24 Hz-144 Hz Ducky Channel Shine 3 Stock 65W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Acer Exoskeleton Steelseries Rival 300 Razer Megasoma AMD-Realtek ALC255 
  hide details  
Reply
AMD FX ~Seronx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-9800P Acer Wasp R7 M440 SK Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N Stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Microsoft Windows 10 Home Build 14393 Viewsonic XG2401 24 Hz-144 Hz Ducky Channel Shine 3 Stock 65W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Acer Exoskeleton Steelseries Rival 300 Razer Megasoma AMD-Realtek ALC255 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by firagabird View Post

One reason why 1080p wasn't used might have to do with Windows's notorious problem with DPI. I'm sure a lot of people buying this laptop wouldn't appreciate having to squint to see most of the text and icons on the screen.

Plus, lack of demand + extra cost = no 1080p.

I don't know why you're defending this at all. Should we be sticking with 16bit colors? Get real. They dropped the ball, at least put a 1600x900 resolution screen in there
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcfoo View Post

@ 13" 768p is not that horrible, but I agree that 900p or better should be a must for anything bigger than 10-11".
And it is not about gaming or anything...high or low resolutions are easier to be disturbing when doing simple (for the GPU) tasks, than gaming, so asking yourself if that 768p is there because the GPU is "weak", is silly...even in 2004-5 with intel chipset 9xx graphics we did not have such "questions".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seronx View Post

Just so you guys know...

With a GPU less power than the AMD Radeon 8400G, the Samsung ATIV w/ Intel has a 3200 x 1800 resolution.

We're all aware that hardware from years ago can push large resolutions, but they're marketing this as "OMG good graphics" then puts in a ****ty screen is what is getting me
Edited by kaivorth - 7/19/13 at 5:24pm
My System
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4690k 3.5ghz Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac Sapphire 270X Vapor X Kingston HyperX 2x2gb 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb Samsung 850 Pro SATA LG DVD Burner Windows 8.1 Professional X64 23" Asus 144hz 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Ergonomic 4000 EVGA 500w Gold EVGA Hadron Air Logitech G400 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4690k 3.5ghz Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac Sapphire 270X Vapor X Kingston HyperX 2x2gb 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250gb Samsung 850 Pro SATA LG DVD Burner Windows 8.1 Professional X64 23" Asus 144hz 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Ergonomic 4000 EVGA 500w Gold EVGA Hadron Air Logitech G400 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [EETimes] AMD's Kabini Spotted Ahead of Schedule