Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › [RESULTS] Is that 8800 GTX really as bottlenecked as we thought?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[RESULTS] Is that 8800 GTX really as bottlenecked as we thought? - Page 2

post #11 of 27
Nice benchmarks. I have only the free edition 3dmarks.

In my thread I meant to bring in a comparison with an older chip, as alot of people don't have c2d or equivalent chips, and I think a 3700+ would still have some trouble keeping up at the settings you posted.

It would be interesting to see how well certain A64 FX chips would do, as with socket 939 they represent the only real improvements in AMD performance.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E6600 @ 3.2ghz 458fsb Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 Vmod Evga 8800gtx @ 752 / 2028 2gb G.Skill PC6400 HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x wd80 Pioneer dvd-r+ xp 22" Mitsubishi crt 1920x1440 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech TT Toughpower 750W Floor.... Laser 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E6600 @ 3.2ghz 458fsb Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 Vmod Evga 8800gtx @ 752 / 2028 2gb G.Skill PC6400 HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x wd80 Pioneer dvd-r+ xp 22" Mitsubishi crt 1920x1440 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech TT Toughpower 750W Floor.... Laser 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Crowley View Post
In my thread I meant to bring in a comparison with an older chip, as alot of people don't have c2d or equivalent chips, and I think a 3700+ would still have some trouble keeping up at the settings you posted.
I dont doubt it, that being said, im heading to bed, ill probably wake up tomorrow and re-read my above posts to find a whole lot of flaws in my logic... thats what happens when im tired.

Anyways, enjoy the results folks, for what their worth.
post #13 of 27
I'm impressed, it's good to see some overclockers with brains.
Nice scores too.
~Kahuna
System
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4790K Gigabyte Z87M-D3H ATi 7870 Tahiti LE  Corsair Vengeance LP  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 Pro Seagate ST1000DM003 Win 7 Dell sp2309w 
PowerCaseAudio
Corsair AX760 Silverstone  Soundblaster Z 
  hide details  
Reply
System
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4790K Gigabyte Z87M-D3H ATi 7870 Tahiti LE  Corsair Vengeance LP  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 Pro Seagate ST1000DM003 Win 7 Dell sp2309w 
PowerCaseAudio
Corsair AX760 Silverstone  Soundblaster Z 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 27
Its kinda funny though, MC just posted that it is heavily bottlenecked then you come out with different results. But you are right tub, I haven't ran games at 1280 x 1024 is like forever. I run everything at 1680 x 1050 now (1600 x 1200 beforehand), which is quite a bit of pixels to push.

So did you just OC your cpu until you saw a marginal increase in 3d06 scores?

Anyways nice results, and thanks for taking the time to really check that all out

PS
But like I keep saying, run your dam games, don't worry about if your bottlenecking or what. If you can play at a reasonable FPS then your fine, can't run how you like, then look into solutions and upgrade. But at least use what we all pay so much money for our components. Game.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel C2D E6600 Week 28A Asus P5B Deluxe eVGA 8800GTX 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2 1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 250gb Seagate 7200.10 (RAID 0) + 250gb backup DVD-RW Window XP Acer AL2216W 22" WS LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Multimedia PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Lian Li PC-V1200B Plus II Modded Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
FUNC 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel C2D E6600 Week 28A Asus P5B Deluxe eVGA 8800GTX 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2 1000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 250gb Seagate 7200.10 (RAID 0) + 250gb backup DVD-RW Window XP Acer AL2216W 22" WS LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Multimedia PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Lian Li PC-V1200B Plus II Modded Logitech MX518 
Mouse Pad
FUNC 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by atomicfission92 View Post
So did you just OC your cpu until you saw a marginal increase in 3d06 scores?
Yeah, that was the basic idea. I was going to go higher but I could only attach 5 screenies per post, so 5 speeds seemed sufficient. Not to mention it took me 2+ hours just to amass the amount of data you see above.
post #16 of 27
gj tub...repped
SandyBrin
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600k ASUS P8P67 Deluxe EVGA GTX570 16gb Corsair XMS3 1600mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD - OS Drive WD Black - Storage Drive LG Blu Ray RW 10x Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Westinghouse LVM-37W3SE 37" Monitor Logitech G15 PC Power & Cooling 650W Silencer MK2 CoolerMaster Stacker 810 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G7 RatPadz XT Logitech Z-5500 Audio Technica ATH-700 
  hide details  
Reply
SandyBrin
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600k ASUS P8P67 Deluxe EVGA GTX570 16gb Corsair XMS3 1600mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD - OS Drive WD Black - Storage Drive LG Blu Ray RW 10x Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Westinghouse LVM-37W3SE 37" Monitor Logitech G15 PC Power & Cooling 650W Silencer MK2 CoolerMaster Stacker 810 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G7 RatPadz XT Logitech Z-5500 Audio Technica ATH-700 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 27
Quote:
But like I keep saying, run your dam games, don't worry about if your bottlenecking or what. If you can play at a reasonable FPS then your fine, can't run how you like, then look into solutions and upgrade. But at least use what we all pay so much money for our components. Game.
For your average user maybe. But some of us like to run spreadsheets, do test after test, compare results and conjure hypothesis not because we want good FPS in games but because we want the answer! Knowing how all of your components inside that case of yours interact, how their different speeds and sizes come together to affect that final image that gets displayed on your screen can be just as (if not more!) satisfying as the image itself.
Core i7
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz Asus P6T Deluxe GeForce GTX 480 G.Skill 6x2GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
4x WD 500 AAKS RAID 0 Windows 7 x64 Dell 2407WFP Antec TPQ 850 
Case
Lian Li A70B 
  hide details  
Reply
Core i7
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz Asus P6T Deluxe GeForce GTX 480 G.Skill 6x2GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
4x WD 500 AAKS RAID 0 Windows 7 x64 Dell 2407WFP Antec TPQ 850 
Case
Lian Li A70B 
  hide details  
Reply
post #18 of 27
nice job ! <=-}
Reclus3
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 965 EE @ 3.8 eVGA X58 eVGA GTX 295FTW Edition 6GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
300GB Velociraptor @ 10000RPM Plextor Blu-Ray Windows 7 Professional Syncmaster 2233RZ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Steelseries 6GV2 Corsair 750W Lian Li Razer Deathadder 
Mouse Pad
Steelseries QCK Heavy 
  hide details  
Reply
Reclus3
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 965 EE @ 3.8 eVGA X58 eVGA GTX 295FTW Edition 6GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
300GB Velociraptor @ 10000RPM Plextor Blu-Ray Windows 7 Professional Syncmaster 2233RZ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Steelseries 6GV2 Corsair 750W Lian Li Razer Deathadder 
Mouse Pad
Steelseries QCK Heavy 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 27
Good show good show =D +1
Frag Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
e6300 L629A@3.00GHz Gigabyte 965P-S3 BFG 8800GTS 640MB 2xOCZ DDR2 800 Plat Rev 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 Lite On DVD-RW XP Home &amp; Vista Ultimate Sony 24in CRT 19inw LCD 1920x1200 + 1440x900 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse II Antec Trio 650W Antec P180 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Steel Pad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
Frag Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
e6300 L629A@3.00GHz Gigabyte 965P-S3 BFG 8800GTS 640MB 2xOCZ DDR2 800 Plat Rev 2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x250 Lite On DVD-RW XP Home &amp; Vista Ultimate Sony 24in CRT 19inw LCD 1920x1200 + 1440x900 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Eclipse II Antec Trio 650W Antec P180 Logitech G5 
Mouse Pad
Steel Pad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 27
I dont get it. My cards are bottle necked bad at 3.595ghz.Look at the below 3dmark06 runs one at 3.8 one at 3.6 there is a huge diffrence in score and fps.This is with my gpu at stock clocks.Ive got almost a 1,000 point increase in score from 3.6-3.8.Very small increase is from cpu test.look at the sm2.0 and 3.0 scores huge diffrence.

15,695 score

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=839472


16,597 score

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=777843

Like I said I dont get.My results are way diffrent .Maybe the bottle neck is so big you just wont see an improvement till you get way up there.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 G0 Evga 680i sli evga 8800ultra KO Corsair xms 9136 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
4 maxtor 6V300F0 liteon 20x dvd sata vista ultimate 32bit ; xp pro dell 30" 3007wfp 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
s510 PPc 1KW-SR stacker 830 g7 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 G0 Evga 680i sli evga 8800ultra KO Corsair xms 9136 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
4 maxtor 6V300F0 liteon 20x dvd sata vista ultimate 32bit ; xp pro dell 30" 3007wfp 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
s510 PPc 1KW-SR stacker 830 g7 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › [RESULTS] Is that 8800 GTX really as bottlenecked as we thought?