Originally Posted by Shrak
And if we look at the more accurate 660m ( as the MBPr is overclocked to 660m speeds ) http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-660M.71859.0.html
Company of Heroes 2 on low 31.7
Crysis 3 on low 74.7
ASC3 on low 61.6
Guild Wars 2 on low 70.5
Skyrim on med 60
BF3 on med 50
Overall? Not bad for the same list of games you provided.
Aww how cute, you said Apple elitists but failed to realise that elitists work the other way around too.
Ok, please read up on my other posts.
If you could provide sufficient evidence, from credible websites that have tests done in any normal GPU categories, such as 3D Mark 11 or anything of that ilk please do. Then i could properly compare the two graphics cards and tell you precisely how much better or worse the 650m is. Here is the funny thing as well, even if it is slightly better than the 660m, if you compare that to the 765m it is still a whopping 41% worse...
Just have a look at Skyrim, on High you get an average of 63 vs 48 fps, a difference of 15 fps which you may say is nothing but compare it to other games.
For example Guild wars 2, on High you get an average of 59 FPS vs 33 FPS.... And guess what, I can tell you for a fact that if you were to go into certain parts of that game your frames would probably go down to 15 Max.
The funny thing is, my original point pretty much stands, which is good luck playing on medium settings at 60fps, only Skyrim barely meets that requirement and by all means if you think that Skyrim is a demanding game... Also the thing about Skyrim is, that you can mod it so incredibly heavily that i dare not think how a 650m would perform...
Skyrim modded out example, also i don't know how many the person installed but it may give a you comparison of what the game can achieve. http://skyrim.nexusmods.com/images/268932/