Originally Posted by tsm106
How do results get changed?
680/770 Kepler is a lot slower. It will be slower in almost every situation due to the fact that it does less work per cycle. Fanboys will deny this obviously but the facts speak for themselves. I'm just saying, we "should" all know this already.
Its not only 3d mark benchmarks but gaming benchmarks most likely, to you it might not be any use but for other with low budget gaming PC will.
How will it come to use? Yes we might know the 780 is better then the 770 but wouldnt you like to see the results? Wouldnt you like to see how much of a bottle neck we see?
Originally Posted by edalbkrad
I voted for the 7970 vs 770 cards.
Im curious how a phenom 955 and FX6300 will hold up. If you could borrow an i3 from someone it would also be a good addition.
Thanks for voting
Wouldnt mind trying to get an i3 after completing the benchmarks, which i3 do you recommend?