Originally Posted by Darklyric
actually 2 were mislabeled but my point was the chipset (790 on the "techspot" benches which are linked to hmm
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
) on the motherboard not that a review site should get the amount of ram on a card wrong, when the bench has been up this long anyway.
My point being we are arguing about a benches for a game that hasn't been out yet (honestly idc until i see some beta/release one) when I just was saying that said benching site has posted invalid benches before.
you didn't even look bro! the techspot benches are their OWN; not a re-post of gamegpu.
so the sources are not the same.
for both of your proofs that gamegpu is biased:
1)using 790 chipset for the FX-8350; when their test bench shows a 990FX,
2) their cpu performance for crysis 3 and metroLL are are wrong; when another site shows similar results independently
funny those BF4 alpha benches have been around a few places:
and NOT ONE person every claimed the site was biased. plenty of complaints about the resolution, it being an alpha but nothing about the site's credibility as you question.
who have use extremely biased benches in the past ie 880 mobo with a custom bios flashed to accept 8 core cpus.... Just saying their rep proceeds them
yeah their reputation proceeds them
so you don't like the site because its russian and so sorry you are google translate challenged but your faults to understand what or how they review is not their fault. you claim the site posted biased benches, ok where are they?
again you have nothing.
edit: btw, i just unsubbed, but go ahead and continue w/o me . .if it makes you feel good/validated.
cheers.Edited by looniam - 8/22/13 at 7:12pm