Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Why 10,000 RPM drives not SATA 3.0Gb/s?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why 10,000 RPM drives not SATA 3.0Gb/s?

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
According to StorageReview.com...

"Raptor continues to deliver excellent performance and maintains its position as the fastest SATA drive around."

That being the case, why is it that Raptors, which are 10,000 RPM, use 1.5 Gb/s SATA while you see 7200 RPM drives using 3.0Gb/s SATA? Please help me fill in the gaps in my understanding. If the fastest SATA drives are SATA 1.5Gb/s then what is the point of manufacturing slower drives with more bandwidth than is being used by even the fastest drive? It seems to me that if any drive would use the extra bandwidth it would be the 10,000 Raptors.

Any shared insight would be appreciated.
Current build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 - G0 evga 680i A1 evga 8800 GTX 768MB 2 GB Patriot 6400 
Hard DriveOSKeyboardPower
2 X 74 GB Raptors RAID 0 XP MS Natural 4000 Antec TPQ 850 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec P182 Gunmetal Trackball Explorer super pad extreme 9000 
  hide details  
Reply
Current build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 - G0 evga 680i A1 evga 8800 GTX 768MB 2 GB Patriot 6400 
Hard DriveOSKeyboardPower
2 X 74 GB Raptors RAID 0 XP MS Natural 4000 Antec TPQ 850 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec P182 Gunmetal Trackball Explorer super pad extreme 9000 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 7
The band width in the SATA3G are no where close to being used regardless of how fast the HDD spin.
Most barely use the SATAI max.
Further more, there are so many varables in data transfer it's mind boggeling.
There are some 7200RPM SATA3 drives that handle high volume file transfers better than the current Raptors with the likes of masive media files. But on the other hand the Raptor is better overall for the performance of a PC's OS and more realistic file managment.
Give and take, give and take, one attribute don't make for the sum of the whole.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 7
The 300mbps isnt fully utilized yet. Most sata 2 drive DO get above sata 1 speeds of 150mbps. But currently sata drives get around 170-180mbps which IS faster than sata1. So if they did make a SATA 2 10000rpm raptor it'd be faster than the sata 1 by a miniscule amount.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AM2 5200+x2 EPoX MF570SLI ATI X1900XT 512mb 2x1gb G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD2500KS Windows XP pro 21'' Dell Trinitron P1130 Generic Micro innovations brand 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Sunbeam Nuuo 550W Cooler Master CM690 MX-518 Fellowes Microban Blackness 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AM2 5200+x2 EPoX MF570SLI ATI X1900XT 512mb 2x1gb G.Skill DDR2-800 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD2500KS Windows XP pro 21'' Dell Trinitron P1130 Generic Micro innovations brand 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Sunbeam Nuuo 550W Cooler Master CM690 MX-518 Fellowes Microban Blackness 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 7
Indeed SATA 150 is barely fully Utilized by anything...SATA 2 would actually be pretty pointless in the long run.

Please fill in your system specs in the User CP at the top of this page so we may help you better in the future.
post #5 of 7
You have to remember that these are all peak values. NOTHING out there uses all of the bw available of even SATAI when comparing continuous read. That's why the 10k Raptor is faster... It can seek more quickly and therefore has a higher average transfer rate than the rest.

Edit: Even Gigabyte's I-RAM doesn't saturate SATA's bandwidth.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3800x2 Manchester, 2.5Ghz ASUS A8N SLI-Deluxe 7600GS --> Smoked 1GB Corsair XMS Platinum 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows XP Pro IBM G74 Aspire 520W Purely Custom 
Mouse
IntelliMouse Explorer 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3800x2 Manchester, 2.5Ghz ASUS A8N SLI-Deluxe 7600GS --> Smoked 1GB Corsair XMS Platinum 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows XP Pro IBM G74 Aspire 520W Purely Custom 
Mouse
IntelliMouse Explorer 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 7
I think the reason is advertisement...
ThinkPad R61
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T7500 ThinkPad Intel GMA X3100 2x1GB DDR2 Value Select Corsair 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
120 Hitachi Windows XP Professional 14.1' UltraNav 
  hide details  
Reply
ThinkPad R61
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
T7500 ThinkPad Intel GMA X3100 2x1GB DDR2 Value Select Corsair 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
120 Hitachi Windows XP Professional 14.1' UltraNav 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 7
Kind of like the alleged IDE133 which is never met and may do in the high 100 teens at best! That in it's self is why WD refuses to rate there HDDs as IDE133 and the unknowing think WD IDEs suck because there not "IDE133" where as the hit the same peaks as the rest around 118.
So in the same light, standards are far beyond what reality is and benchmarks are synthetic and only create a reasonable tool to compare devices... unless it's a memory bench which mostly suck.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X4 965 ASUS M4A79 Deluxe 9800GTx2 2x2G OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500G WD Black LiteOn CD/DVD R/W Win7 64 22'' ws Acer AL2223W 
KeyboardPowerMouse
MS KU462 Natural SS DA750 MS 5 button 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hard Drives & Storage
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › Why 10,000 RPM drives not SATA 3.0Gb/s?