Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › Why are the access-times this bad?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why are the access-times this bad?

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Been comparing some benchmarks since I am thinking about getting a Samsung 840 Pro 256gb drive instead of the two Corsair disc I currently use.
Can't understand why the access time is this bad?

3930k
(17 items)
 
Xeon H2O
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3930K RAMPAGE IV EXTREME AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
Team Xtreme Vulcan 2400 Samsung 840 EVO EK CSQ Nickel Plexi water block Alphacool Monsta 480 radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSKeyboard
Alphacool XT45 420 radiator 2x EK CSQ Nickel Plexi Fullcover GPU Windows 7 64-bit Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master V1000 Phanteks Enthoo Primo Logitech G500 Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus 
Audio
Yamaha HS50m 
  hide details  
Reply
3930k
(17 items)
 
Xeon H2O
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3930K RAMPAGE IV EXTREME AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
Team Xtreme Vulcan 2400 Samsung 840 EVO EK CSQ Nickel Plexi water block Alphacool Monsta 480 radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSKeyboard
Alphacool XT45 420 radiator 2x EK CSQ Nickel Plexi Fullcover GPU Windows 7 64-bit Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master V1000 Phanteks Enthoo Primo Logitech G500 Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus 
Audio
Yamaha HS50m 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 8
Everything apart from the sequential read speeds seem bad to be honest.



Found that for the 128GB online. I can't really offer any help though, is it plugged in to a Sata 3 port?




EDIT: I just misread your post completely. Have you got the two Corsair drives raided?
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
Yes. Running them in a Raid 0 config on a x58 sata2 controller. That is not the best, I know, but should the access-time be that bad still?
3930k
(17 items)
 
Xeon H2O
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3930K RAMPAGE IV EXTREME AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
Team Xtreme Vulcan 2400 Samsung 840 EVO EK CSQ Nickel Plexi water block Alphacool Monsta 480 radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSKeyboard
Alphacool XT45 420 radiator 2x EK CSQ Nickel Plexi Fullcover GPU Windows 7 64-bit Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master V1000 Phanteks Enthoo Primo Logitech G500 Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus 
Audio
Yamaha HS50m 
  hide details  
Reply
3930k
(17 items)
 
Xeon H2O
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3930K RAMPAGE IV EXTREME AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series AMD Radeon HD 7970 Series 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
Team Xtreme Vulcan 2400 Samsung 840 EVO EK CSQ Nickel Plexi water block Alphacool Monsta 480 radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSKeyboard
Alphacool XT45 420 radiator 2x EK CSQ Nickel Plexi Fullcover GPU Windows 7 64-bit Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master V1000 Phanteks Enthoo Primo Logitech G500 Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus 
Audio
Yamaha HS50m 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 8
whats bad? i see nothing bad....
Le Main Rig
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1 Gigabyte GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC G.SKILL Ripjaws V  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1050GB Crucial MX300 1050GB Crucial MX300 960GB OCZ RD400 1TB Micron M600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1TB WD Blue Noctua NH-U12S Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit BenQ GW2765HT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ GW2765HT FUNC KB-460 Corsair RM650 Fractal Design R5 
Mouse
Logitec G500 
  hide details  
Reply
Le Main Rig
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1 Gigabyte GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC G.SKILL Ripjaws V  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1050GB Crucial MX300 1050GB Crucial MX300 960GB OCZ RD400 1TB Micron M600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1TB WD Blue Noctua NH-U12S Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit BenQ GW2765HT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ GW2765HT FUNC KB-460 Corsair RM650 Fractal Design R5 
Mouse
Logitec G500 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 8
I think it's probably because they're plugged in a Sata II port. They can have an affect on other things along with the read/write speeds.

They're decent access times Sean, but in comparison to that Sata III I posted above, it's three times slower in the respect and four times slow in the write access times.
post #6 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawswing View Post

I think it's probably because they're plugged in a Sata II port. They can have an affect on other things along with the read/write speeds.

They're decent access times Sean, but in comparison to that Sata III I posted above, it's three times slower in the respect and four times slow in the write access times.
But you are comparing completely different drives. You can not compare yours to theirs.

The OPs access times are normal for their drives.
Le Main Rig
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1 Gigabyte GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC G.SKILL Ripjaws V  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1050GB Crucial MX300 1050GB Crucial MX300 960GB OCZ RD400 1TB Micron M600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1TB WD Blue Noctua NH-U12S Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit BenQ GW2765HT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ GW2765HT FUNC KB-460 Corsair RM650 Fractal Design R5 
Mouse
Logitec G500 
  hide details  
Reply
Le Main Rig
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1 Gigabyte GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC G.SKILL Ripjaws V  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1050GB Crucial MX300 1050GB Crucial MX300 960GB OCZ RD400 1TB Micron M600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1TB WD Blue Noctua NH-U12S Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit BenQ GW2765HT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ GW2765HT FUNC KB-460 Corsair RM650 Fractal Design R5 
Mouse
Logitec G500 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 8
Yeah, that's fair enough. He didn't actually state whether he thought is was bad in comparison to others of his same drive or not.
It probably is fine for his particular drive, but he obviously isn't happy with it, so I was just trying to give him some advice.
post #8 of 8
For me the acces times go up when filled with data , with abouth 50 procent free space it is under 0.0xx ms with abouth 75 procent filled it is 0.1xx ms, with no trim the acces time only goes up:)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: SSD
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › Why are the access-times this bad?