Originally Posted by _GTech Source
I've personally had enough of the underhanded things they are going on, now the servers for BFBC2 are down, BF2 is completely dead, and I'm sure BF3 will also be next up to bat....
hmm i knew that they could eventually do it. are no public servers not run by EA for bf2 and bf3 allowed? if no then EA should really burn.
Originally Posted by opi
Yea wth, I thought that EA decided to "retire" (kill) BFBC2 suddenly, but not because of server issues. Although I still get the complaint but this is overblown. They should of waited until they did kill the game and then bring this lawsuit up. It would gather much more steam and be much more effective.
yep we need to force EA and other companies to run public servers for ever
if they insist on not allowing people run their own servers.
Originally Posted by Papas
This is a stupid lawsuit. They are not requiredto keep online play forever. Jeez people use your heads. TThat's like asking ford to service your 1986 f150 with 250kmiles for free. Anyone who joins this lawsuit is bbrain dead and needs to get there crap together.
maybe they should depose that new ceo of theirs (head of fifa nad origin) how does he plan to screw customers i mean increase shareholder value by bait and switch. i guess it works like this they force only official servers and then after few years they shut them down, so the sheeple has to buy new game. so much for digital goods dont degrade and why they need protection ...
PS: if this is true, nobody should buy their multiplayer games, or in worst case just the basic BF game without premium, why bother spending 100usd/100eur on something that will no longer function 5 years from now
revroEdited by revro - 9/22/13 at 4:56am