Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -

Poll Results: 8120 or 6300

 
  • 57% (4)
    AMD FX-8120
  • 42% (3)
    AMD FX-6200
7 Total Votes  
post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
I'm conflicted on which processor I should get for VMs 8120 or 6300. I usually run about 4 VMs at a time - 3 Win7 1 Kali and I'm looking for Srv 2012 in addition.

I understand that Vishera runs 15% faster than Zambezi however I can't seem to convince myself that'd be enough to make it worth it. One uses older technology than the other so I guess that's where I'm stuck. Not to mention one uses a lot more power than the other which is something to consider.

Obviously 8 cores beats 6.. but I thought I'd get some input first.

The spin is the advancement in technology with piledrive.

This is for labs, not for gaming (already have a rig).



*Please explain your sources so others and myself are able to verify instead of something you think is right.. that only makes the decision process worse tongue.gif


Thanks!!! biggrin.gif
Edited by QueenLatiffa - 10/16/13 at 5:59am
post #2 of 3
+1 FX8120.
 
The Rift Machine
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 6100 GIGABYTE GA-H110M-A Gigabyte GTX 970 4GB G1 Gaming Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB 3200MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Muskin ECO3 480GB SSD  Windows 10 64bit Sony Bravia 52" Logitech K400r Wireless Keyboard Trackpad 
PowerCaseOther
EVGA 600 B1 80+ BRONZE 600W Deepcool Tesseract Oculus Rift CV1 + Oculus Touch Controller 
  hide details  
Reply
 
The Rift Machine
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 6100 GIGABYTE GA-H110M-A Gigabyte GTX 970 4GB G1 Gaming Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB 3200MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Muskin ECO3 480GB SSD  Windows 10 64bit Sony Bravia 52" Logitech K400r Wireless Keyboard Trackpad 
PowerCaseOther
EVGA 600 B1 80+ BRONZE 600W Deepcool Tesseract Oculus Rift CV1 + Oculus Touch Controller 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 3
The per thread performance isn't hugely in favor of the 6300, maybe a few%. Seing you use VMs you'd probably benefit more from the extra cores, so I'll vote for the 8120. If you want to bring them to similar power level it suffices to disable Turbo on the 8120 - you'd still have the benefit of the extra cores. Two cores per VM is a good arrangement, 1.5cores (8 virtual per 6 physical) is less ideal from a scheduling perspective even on slightly-faster cores.

Only one way I'd choose the 6300: the VMs are very light weight and wouldn't charge their CPUs too much. In that case the 8120 is overkill and maybe even a 4350 could work.
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -