Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -

Poll Results: 8120 or 6300

 
  • 57% (4)
    AMD FX-8120
  • 42% (3)
    AMD FX-6200
7 Total Votes  
post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
I'm conflicted on which processor I should get for VMs 8120 or 6300. I usually run about 4 VMs at a time - 3 Win7 1 Kali and I'm looking for Srv 2012 in addition.

I understand that Vishera runs 15% faster than Zambezi however I can't seem to convince myself that'd be enough to make it worth it. One uses older technology than the other so I guess that's where I'm stuck. Not to mention one uses a lot more power than the other which is something to consider.

Obviously 8 cores beats 6.. but I thought I'd get some input first.

The spin is the advancement in technology with piledrive.

This is for labs, not for gaming (already have a rig).



*Please explain your sources so others and myself are able to verify instead of something you think is right.. that only makes the decision process worse tongue.gif


Thanks!!! biggrin.gif
Edited by QueenLatiffa - 10/16/13 at 5:59am
post #2 of 3
+1 FX8120.
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 6100 GIGABYTE GA-H110M-A Gigabyte GTX 970 4GB G1 Gaming (1580MHz/8000MHz) 2x8GB Crucial 2400MHz DDR4 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240GB Solid State Drive Lepa NEOllusion RGB Heatsink Cooler Windows 10 64bit 27" ASUS MX279H-X 1920x1080 IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech K360 EVGA 600 B1 PSU Deepcool Tesseract Steelseries Rival 
Audio
Logitech Z333 2.1 Speaker System 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i3 6100 GIGABYTE GA-H110M-A Gigabyte GTX 970 4GB G1 Gaming (1580MHz/8000MHz) 2x8GB Crucial 2400MHz DDR4 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240GB Solid State Drive Lepa NEOllusion RGB Heatsink Cooler Windows 10 64bit 27" ASUS MX279H-X 1920x1080 IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech K360 EVGA 600 B1 PSU Deepcool Tesseract Steelseries Rival 
Audio
Logitech Z333 2.1 Speaker System 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 3
The per thread performance isn't hugely in favor of the 6300, maybe a few%. Seing you use VMs you'd probably benefit more from the extra cores, so I'll vote for the 8120. If you want to bring them to similar power level it suffices to disable Turbo on the 8120 - you'd still have the benefit of the extra cores. Two cores per VM is a good arrangement, 1.5cores (8 virtual per 6 physical) is less ideal from a scheduling perspective even on slightly-faster cores.

Only one way I'd choose the 6300: the VMs are very light weight and wouldn't charge their CPUs too much. In that case the 8120 is overkill and maybe even a 4350 could work.
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
Centurion
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 940 @3.3GHz 1.25V Gigabyte 790X-DS4 XFX 5850 8GB OCZ DDR2-800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair Force 3 TRUE Win 7 Pro x64 ACER 23" TN  
PowerCase
400W Silverstone Strider Antec P182 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8120 or 6300? - Poll -