Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Kaveri Vs. Vishera
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Kaveri Vs. Vishera

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Hello Gents,

I know very little has been released on the performance of the new Kaveri APUs, but is there a chance that the top end model will be quicker than the Vishera FX8350? I have been having non stop issues with my 8350 build since last year and I am wondering if I should just junk it and move onto the new Kaveri when they come out and just use a dedicated videocard (going to buy R290).

Sorry if there is already a thread out there that covers the subject.
post #2 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaethon666 View Post

Hello Gents,

I know very little has been released on the performance of the new Kaveri APUs, but is there a chance that the top end model will be quicker than the Vishera FX8350? I have been having non stop issues with my 8350 build since last year and I am wondering if I should just junk it and move onto the new Kaveri when they come out and just use a dedicated videocard (going to buy R290).

Sorry if there is already a thread out there that covers the subject.

No one knows yet as there hasnt been any info released as of yet.
Most people are saying it will be about 25% less performance then the FX8350 so who knows..
You just have to wait and see like the rest of us!!
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the info mate!
post #4 of 8
Single-threaded? Probably. It should be a bigger performance improvement than Bulldozer to Piledriver and the energy usage is lower too, allowing higher overclocks.
Multi-threaded? If they implement 6GHz stock clockspeeds and a hyper-threading-like system, then sure! In other words, no. As APUs, they're only going to have four cores to start with but there is some speculations that three modules/six cores is possible.
Genesis M1
(21 items)
 
Ashurbanipal M2
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Celeron G1610 ASUS P8H77-M LE 1x4GB ADATA XPG - 1600MHz ADATA Premier Pro SP900 64GB (cache drive) 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
WD SE16 640GB (wow, such storage!) FreeNAS Corsair CX500 Gateway OEM Thing 
Other
Evercool HD-AR-RBK Drive bay/cooler 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II x3 N830 AMD 765GX "Guam" ATI Radeon Mobility HD 4250 Nanya Technology 2x4GB - 1333MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOS
Samsung 840 250GB (OS) Samsung 840 120GB (hot-swap) Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 
  hide details  
Reply
Genesis M1
(21 items)
 
Ashurbanipal M2
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Celeron G1610 ASUS P8H77-M LE 1x4GB ADATA XPG - 1600MHz ADATA Premier Pro SP900 64GB (cache drive) 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
WD SE16 640GB (wow, such storage!) FreeNAS Corsair CX500 Gateway OEM Thing 
Other
Evercool HD-AR-RBK Drive bay/cooler 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II x3 N830 AMD 765GX "Guam" ATI Radeon Mobility HD 4250 Nanya Technology 2x4GB - 1333MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOS
Samsung 840 250GB (OS) Samsung 840 120GB (hot-swap) Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 8
Considering Gigabyte made a sniper board for it and the CPU is 2 years younger then Kaveria then It should by a good bit
Micro
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570K 4.3ghz MSI Z77IA-E53 MSI R9 270X Corsair Vengeance LP 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ-VERTEX 60gb  Seagate 4 Terebyte SAMSUNG 128 Msata OCZ 240 agility  
Optical DriveCoolingMonitorMonitor
Blu Dvd rom NH-L12  3 P206HL Monitors 4800x900 Element 46inch 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
K360 Silverstone 600 wat bronze SG08 Performance MX 
  hide details  
Reply
Micro
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570K 4.3ghz MSI Z77IA-E53 MSI R9 270X Corsair Vengeance LP 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ-VERTEX 60gb  Seagate 4 Terebyte SAMSUNG 128 Msata OCZ 240 agility  
Optical DriveCoolingMonitorMonitor
Blu Dvd rom NH-L12  3 P206HL Monitors 4800x900 Element 46inch 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
K360 Silverstone 600 wat bronze SG08 Performance MX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 8
check the Steamroller? thread thats the Arch behind Kevari sift through all the posts and you will have a better idea
post #7 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by CynicalUnicorn View Post

Single-threaded? Probably. It should be a bigger performance improvement than Bulldozer to Piledriver and the energy usage is lower too, allowing higher overclocks.
Multi-threaded? If they implement 6GHz stock clockspeeds and a hyper-threading-like system, then sure! In other words, no. As APUs, they're only going to have four cores to start with but there is some speculations that three modules/six cores is possible.


If they are using what we think they are, then I wouldn't expect it. Bulk isn't going to deliver major clock speeds.
post #8 of 8
Kaveri, which will use AMD's new Steamroller x86 cores, will surpass Vishera in any single-threaded task and possibly even most lightly-threaded tasks (as we already see Intel quad cores beating the Vishera octocore parts in these workloads). In any situation where all 8 threads would be used however, it's unrealistic to expect the quad-core Kaveri to beat it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Kaveri Vs. Vishera