post #71 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post



Looks good, half the performance hit with R9 290, and even better with R9 280X.
thats great because tressfx 1.0 was a huge pertformance hit,people here saying that nvidia fur technology is a mess with huge performance hit but how about the performance hit in tressfx?also i was actually impressed by the fur technology

in tombrider the performance loss with tressfx was as if i enabled 8x aa its really not good,i hope that it will be better with tressfx 2.0
my rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k @4.6ghz  asus maximus vi hero MSI Radeon R9 390X 8GB 4gb kingston xhyper 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
carvier vengeance 4gb cavier green 2tb samsung evo 850 250gb st3250 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Noctua NF-P14 noctua nh-d14 win8 64bit lg ld550 32' 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
SeaSonic x-750 sharkoon rebel 9 microsoft 6000 optical comfort asus xonar dx 
  hide details  
Reply
my rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k @4.6ghz  asus maximus vi hero MSI Radeon R9 390X 8GB 4gb kingston xhyper 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
carvier vengeance 4gb cavier green 2tb samsung evo 850 250gb st3250 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Noctua NF-P14 noctua nh-d14 win8 64bit lg ld550 32' 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
SeaSonic x-750 sharkoon rebel 9 microsoft 6000 optical comfort asus xonar dx 
  hide details  
Reply