Originally Posted by Ino.
Updated with 500 Hz results from Enotus. This time MouseTester reported even higher speeds while Enotus seemed to be more conservative. But this time I've also always used both at the same time and so could see what results Enotus deliveres for the same swipe that MouseTester delivered the graph. Somehow Enotus seems to be more conservative than MouseTester. I guess that's a good thing.
Would you be kind enough to upload them too?
I've seen that your use of Enotus has been kinda liberal on the 1150 step (on 1kHz it's being read as 1200CPI, whereas on your latest screenshots it's being "detected" at 1000CPI), which could cause some disparity on the results given the rounding the program gives to readings.
Logically it gives much higher PCS when Enotus detects it a lower CPI.
As a side request and a bit off topic :
How would you judge this mouse compared to the FK?
I've read around that the new batches of FK have the same IR Led and "tape trick".
Any comment on how well implemented they seem compared to previous versions?
Specifically about the plastic lens cover designed to do the tape trick, did it attract dust in your case?